|
Post by Badly Drawn Stickman on Aug 7, 2018 8:03:25 GMT
I would be inclined to agree, the real test is if any of the apples or oranges are lemons in disguise. (Very fond of fruit based discussions) As long as we don't get 5 a day. If we cherry pick the plum ones I don't mind
|
|
|
Post by marcusponds on Aug 7, 2018 12:21:12 GMT
For me I believe MT are extremely conservative in their definition of "default" which is far tighter than other portals. Comparing numbers when the definitions vary is normally termed comparing apples with oranges. I suspect that is what we have here. @bobo I’d agree that MT is conservative in its definition of ‘non performing, ‘ but not relative to ‘default’ . I base this on MT updates which are understandably limited but rarely encouraging in terms of recovery amount. We all understand P2P is risky but the number of defaults is scary, and with no pipeline to speak of it’s virtually impossible to diversify across this platform. So I am moving funds to others, which until a few months ago never crossed my mind.
|
|