mikeb
Posts: 1,053 
Likes: 463
|
Post by mikeb on Mar 31, 2014 11:00:56 GMT
Is getting a new kitchen sink on that famous list too? As long as there's a declared API for it ... that's gotta be important!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Mar 31, 2014 11:02:47 GMT
The AM is completely free of E-T*****Y, the whole lots gone, poof into some lucky so and so's Account (about 3k)(Or has it been suspended?)
|
|
TFTO
Member of DD Central
Posts: 143
Likes: 71
|
Post by TFTO on Mar 31, 2014 11:19:42 GMT
It's on our to do list but is of lower priority compared to some of the other jobs on that list. There must be some good stuff on the list then?
|
|
|
|
Post by chris on Mar 31, 2014 11:24:09 GMT
It's on our to do list but is of lower priority compared to some of the other jobs on that list. There must be some good stuff on the list then? Like you wouldn't believe!
|
|
|
|
Post by mead187 on Mar 31, 2014 11:31:30 GMT
Ive been meaning to lower my exposure to this loan for sometime but this thread jolted me into action last night, hope it doesnt go sour for the person(s) that bought it. I doubt it will but its better to be safe than sorry
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Mar 31, 2014 12:35:14 GMT
The two questions have both been answered in the Q&A section of E-T*****Y I was tempted to copy them here but thought better of it. Worth reading.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,452
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Mar 31, 2014 16:56:14 GMT
The two questions have both been answered in the Q&A section of E-T*****Y, I was tempted to copy them here but thought better of it. Worth reading. There's also a note on the LoanInfo tab, and a comment referring to that has been added to the loan description. That should make it harder for any lender buying parts of this loan -- should any more be offered on the AM -- to remain oblivious of the situation. IMHO these are all positive moves by AC.
|
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Mar 31, 2014 22:05:08 GMT
Mod Hat on: Someone has rightly asked the question on another thread as to why the name of the borrower was allowed to stand in this thread. Call it oversight/blindness/stupidity, whatever.
The reality is that the name of this borrower is listed on the public area of ACs website, hence an excuse for the oversight. However, as has been noted before, the aim is to avoid over complication of the naming rules for both posters and moderators, and therefore to in general not name. The fact that AC have happily posted in the thread and not asked for removal of the name is pertinent but not overriding: after all they can only speak for themselves not the borrower, nor for the mods of the board. And a subsequent post into the thread which might be more controversial than what has been posted to date would then be problematic if the the borrower is named. Anyway, its late. Nuts of it is that I have done a relatively wholesale mod of this thread to obfuscate the name of the borrower and some other information: I'm aware I probably have not manged a perfect job in doing that given the length of the thread and the number of re-quotes. It would be appreciated if you don't undo that work with other posts on this thread. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Mar 31, 2014 22:15:59 GMT
That's clear, thanks for going thru' the thread and **ing.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 1,487
|
Post by pikestaff on Mar 31, 2014 22:17:17 GMT
I was wondering why it had not been obfuscated and came to the conclusion that there is no reason why it should be, given the facts under discussion are in the public domain (Companies House).
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Mar 31, 2014 22:21:00 GMT
Do you mean the London Gazzette, it is public but not widely known. Indeed it took us a month to find out, and we need to know this sort of info.
IN EDIT. But in the heat of passion we all lost our heads, now we're calm we can behave calmly and with dignity. Also we don't want to go right up to the danger line we should play safe and be a little way back from it, there is a good metaphor but I can't think of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Mar 31, 2014 22:27:25 GMT
I was wondering why it had not been obfuscated and came to the conclusion that there is no reason why it should be, given the facts under discussion are in the public domain (Companies House). Hi Pikestaff, you are correct that the information being discussed is in the public domain, and no new information is created by linking the two bits together. And this is probably the unconscious reason why it wasn't picked up earlier. However the aim is to keep the application of the rule simple unless there is a real overriding reason not to. Hence the rather late in the day mod'ing.
|
|
andy2001
Member of DD Central
Posts: 361
Likes: 34
|
Post by andy2001 on Mar 31, 2014 22:32:42 GMT
I was wondering why it had not been obfuscated and came to the conclusion that there is no reason why it should be, given the facts under discussion are in the public domain (Companies House).
This old thread talks a bit about this.
p2pindependentforum.com/thread/169/dolphin
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 3,138
|
Post by jonno on Apr 1, 2014 10:31:40 GMT
Am I completely out of kilter with reality,or is the apparent ease with which these units are selling on the AM mindbendingly inexplicable? Please help me.Someone  |
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Apr 1, 2014 10:48:29 GMT
In a sense there should be no problem. The issue that started this off is clearly a tactic by HMRC to get their bill paid. If you look at their loan proposal there's a CCJ in there that was meant to be sorted before we lent, either it wasn't properly dealt with or yet another problem has arisen. Either way ET (the company) has assets that we can call upon if needed but I'll be very surprised if it goes that far. Mind you I think we should be getting about 18% for the risk rather than 12%. I did hold £100 this is now at £20. This is my opinion and I've beed wrong many times before, so come to your own opinion.
I'm still in as I want to see where this leads and all the processes that AC do, the emails they send out how long it takes etc, etc.
|
|
