Moosenomics. Make any suggestions/comments here.

PM has been the most disappointing platform I have used. That's not the same as saying that it is the worst, there are several that I rate as worse, but I had such high hopes for the platform which have been dashed. 
Properties supposedly bought at a discount to MV which were sold at a loss after 2 years.
Excessive void periods and non-paying tenants.
Excessive PM costs
Lack of transparency
etc

And will The FCA take note and learn?

Do not hold your breath.

Same here

Some valid concerns there, some of which I agree with.  My main concern with PM is the 'sell to crowd' option at the end of the term; it means the value of the property is never truly tested in the market against the claimed significant discounts at initial listing and it's what I believe is responsible for some of the poor capital returns experienced so far.  If the initial valuation is very optimistic to sell the property the crowd and the valuation at term is less optimistic the chances are that any capital gain is going to be small or even negative (which seems to be the way so far).  Is it the same person providing the valuation upon initial listing and at term?  Personally I'd only like to sell out if the property is sold on the open market.  The sell to crowd option is a tricky one for PM to manage, they have to try and please the people selling and the people buying in (and take a slice for themselves?), so far it looks like the people buying in are being favoured at the expense of the sellers.  Hopefully it will become a non-issue as the properties run on for more than 3 years, we shall see!  It will be interesting to see how PP's 5 year sell out pricing will compare, only then can we fairly compare the two platforms.

I continue to invest in PM (even split with PP); so far I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and plan to hold properties longer than 3 years.  Though I will only truly be happy with PM when SPV 47 is rented out or an act of God wipes it from this earth  (assuming it's insured for said 'disaster').

Would also be interested to hear what you base that statement on cooldad - everything appears to be up and running to me.

Can anyone, including anyone at propertymoose, explain the moosenomics of SPV 54?

Until recently it had a (very high) share 'value' of around £14.50, with secondary market prices to match (nearly), whilst now the 'value' has crashed to £10.41. Ths secondary market prices have likewise plummeted. This seems more realistic now, and perhaps propertymoose have 'recalculated' the values, but all this leaves me feeling rather nervous.