guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 19, 2018 18:12:15 GMT
True, but you are aware that there are people on here that are "Considerably richer than yow!" (No offence, was taking the mickey out of someone else!) So thy haven't vastly overstretched themselves. Or have thy.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 19, 2018 15:34:17 GMT
The archaeologists are digging another hole this morning. Another dig - 'k*** hell!
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 19, 2018 12:58:42 GMT
… like needles in haystacks … After doing a bit of head analysis… I have no idea where these Worzel Gummidge mental images are coming from.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 19, 2018 11:14:49 GMT
We now have two separate categories: "Non-Performing" and "Claims Underway" I'd guess if jonah is still attempting to fix the script for gathering Lendy stats for the tracker, that'll be yet more changes to incorporate. In the meantime, at time of writing, the "partially repaid" category has disappeared, and loans which have actually partially repaid are tarnished with a "Claims Underway" label on the live loans page, even when they're within the agreed repayment schedule! This is great news. Lendy are pursuing all borrowers and not treating the money as lost. Well done Lendy. Plus the added protection of the PF. ILL It's an ill wind…
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 21:21:08 GMT
Don't forget to wear your Henri Lloyd designed J***** V***** team jackets. Failing that, name badges with A-7 on them.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 21:12:05 GMT
I came across that some time ago, but CUK are not Regal and IMHO the FCA should not have updated their website without first checking the company numbers. Does it not suggest that a registered representative of Regal could have changed the register without the FCA even knowing about it? I agree such a thing should not be possible as it would be a massive security hole, but the text suggests it could be possible for a firm to edit its own entry on the register without FCA review. If someone connected to Regal made the change, then someone connected to COL started dealing with the FCA quoting the IP reference number (which at that time would show the firm name as Collateral (UK) Limited), then it's easy to see how there could have been confusion over the status of COL at the FCA for an extended period of time. It's even entirely within the realms of possibility that the person connected to Regal and the person connected to COL are one and the same. Basic checks would, of course, prevent such errors. Either CUK could make unaudited changes to the FCA database [wholly unsatisfactory FCA process and system not fit for purpose] or changes were made by the FCA [unsatisfactory FCA checks borne out by them (presumably) adding the last (incorrect) name of a non-existent company to the approval]. www.fca.org.uk/about/complain-about-regulators/form
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 19:05:53 GMT
There's a very interesting revelation that has been raised on DDC that hasn't been mentioned here yet: www.fca.org.uk/firms/interim-permission-consumer-creditThe above link deals with what to do when there are changes to a firms details. It describes an online system where firms register one or more contacts who can then "amend basic details such as a firm name, address or telephone number". Other changes require the FCA to be notified using a relevant form. The implication would seem to be that firm name, for example, can be amended without notifying the FCA. I came across that some time ago, but CUK are not Regal and IMHO the FCA should not have updated their website without first checking the company numbers.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 14:58:33 GMT
guff Maybe I misunderstood and you were using the "graffiti" spelling. Is that my banana in your mouth, or are you just pleased to see me?
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 14:29:50 GMT
It's pronounced B*****S
Errr .... B*****S Bananas? Criticised by a great ape about asterisks: How galling.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 18, 2018 14:00:22 GMT
...... pronounced ....... SPIN!
It's pronounced B*****S
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 17, 2018 20:38:29 GMT
I wonder if anyone here will attend the hearing on 27 April (assuming that is possible?!). dualinvestor ? you are probably too busy and i think you said you are not personally invested but would be great if someone that lives nearby could try I don't think dualinvestor lives particularly close. And what's the betting the hearing gets postponed. Still, there is excellent cheap accommodation to be had in Wigan and Huddersfield (allegedly).
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 17, 2018 20:34:12 GMT
"Some excited diggers!!" - and one nervous developer, perhaps? A significant find would cause delays and add to costs? Hopefully just a few Richard the Thirds.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 15, 2018 15:50:45 GMT
What I object to is people saying, 'this fish/chicken/duck skin is not crispy and I can't eat it.' The word is crisp! Try telling that to my rice.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 14, 2018 15:34:58 GMT
I can't tell you here Jonno or I will be moderated out again by somebody. I'll PM you. Never mind tiger, you'll be able to climb those alpine slopes with nothing other than your trusty rapier to protect you from the tall bots.
|
|
guff
Posts: 730
Likes: 707
|
Post by guff on Apr 14, 2018 10:26:22 GMT
My pictures show the part of the development still well behind schedule, just so that false forecasts of "imminent" completion cannot be made. Much of the development is smart and at a much more advanced state. People already live here… Indeed, and ¾ of the 4000 new windows appear to have been installed. Sir M****** C******* would be impressed:
|
|