|
Post by patricko on Aug 28, 2014 15:11:27 GMT
I started with FC about 6 months ago and gradually built up my holding so now I have about 400 loan parts with about 280 businesses.
I have not yet had any bad debt. I have 4 loans which have been downgraded and one with payment 17 days late.
Is this fairly typical or have I been lucky? Just wondering if I should be expecting the bad debts to start piling up.
|
|
ianb
Posts: 161
Likes: 54
|
Post by ianb on Aug 28, 2014 16:43:10 GMT
The latter, maybe. I started last October, first bad 'un in April, now have 4. And of these four, amount recovered - zero, zip, bu**er all.
|
|
merlin
Minor shareholder in Assetz and many other companies.
Posts: 902
Likes: 302
|
Post by merlin on Aug 28, 2014 17:29:28 GMT
I think that on balance and past performance you have been lucky so far but for how much longer? In the past I have been one of the loudest moaners on this site about the apparent high rate of defaults and bad debts that FC were running last year. Earlier this year FC took it upon themselves to manage bad payers and debts and from my perspective things have improved. Realistically defaults and bad debts are a fact of life in the P2P business and high rates of interest/return bring with them a certainty of some degree of failure. Thus ultimately it is all about how much risk you are prepared to take with your investment strategy and who you are trusting with your money.
|
|
baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 549
Likes: 407
|
Post by baldpate on Aug 28, 2014 17:51:16 GMT
The FC Statistics page shows several "Bad debt performance" graphs. All have one feature in common : a notable absence of bad debts in the first 5/6 months of a loans life. If patricko and ianb were acquiring loans at auction or buying only fresh loans on the secondary market, this could be relevant to their experience.
|
|
|
Post by captainconfident on Aug 28, 2014 18:45:28 GMT
True but historically there have been some major 1st, 2nd payment defaults, Breath of Foul Air, S#%t House and the 300k loan which fell straight over, to name a few. When these occur, you lose all your capital invested, not just a depreciated part left a year or so later.
OK there was a 50% recovery of the 300k loan. Only lost half the investment there. What ever happened to the rest of that story? Must check..
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Aug 28, 2014 19:22:18 GMT
I tend to be of the pessimistic/fairly gloomy genre of biped when FC is mentioned, then disappointments hurt less and grumpiness is more short-lived.
In since Dec2012 (just in time for Breath of foul air).
754 businesses. Interest £4783 Interest less 20% tax £3826 Losses £461 = 12% of my net interest lost. (9.6% of gross interest)
Is that about "average"?
They tell me my annualised return since I started is now 7.3%; take off tax = 5.84%, but I'm never sure quite what to make of their figures (i.e how much more to subtract to allow for "dead" time on auctions especially when loans are declined. My gross rate is 10.6% so fees/losses/tax take off about 4.8% from the rate which I have bid on.
Not worth the effort I used to put into selecting businesses. I get 6+% now for doing very little on RS, and more on Wellesley (old rates), and probably much more on AC (I have shadow account) and SS - I haven't worked it out.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Aug 28, 2014 21:40:14 GMT
It is exactly two years since I put my first £10k into Autobid at 5% diversity and received a clutch of £400 loan parts from the secondary market. The start of a learning process. I think the most convenient way of judging the effect of losses is to express losses as a percentage of Gross interest, just using the two figures in the summary. It strips out the trading and promotions - and our individual tax positions. My losses as a percentage of gross interest received (£13k) are 5.3%. I have had four defaults but the effect has been mitigated by 45% recoveries. I am happy with this, except that the defaults I have dodged must have fallen on other lenders. Some of this is down to luck, but some down to management.
As others have said before, some losses can be avoided by selling those loans which go late, after the first payment, and which come back to life. I also agree with Grumpy that due diligence has its limitations. Because there is no business plan, no cash flow forecast, no ongoing supervision, we are soon flying blind. And I agree that the first six months is generally safer and try to refresh my portfolio and maintain liquidity, churning the riskier banded loans sooner than the less risky. This year I have disposed of all C- (aka D), and am heavily into the better property loans for the cashback and the fact that they are completely safe up to the end of the term. I admit to being a diversity criminal, and to spending some time on my account - not having to work for a living helps.
Currently using the summary, gross yield is 10.1%, annualised return is 9.6% (all those cashbacks) and fully diversified 7.3%, on a substantial account over two years. So if you work at it and are lucky it can be good. But if your time is valuable I would think there may be better places.
|
|
fasty
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 388
|
Post by fasty on Aug 28, 2014 22:36:34 GMT
I've been using FC for around 18 months but it seems that I'm either not as lucky (or no doubt as clever) as blender. My percentage of unrecovered loss to gross interest (excluding cashbacks etc) is around 12%, despite a highly diversified portfolio.
I too went through a learning process and one of the first lessons was that I didn't like what autobid bought for me. Despite the losses I've managed to build gross yield up to 11.5% and annualised return to 9.8%. My target is 10%. Having been through periods where it seemed difficult to sell lower rate loan parts on the secondary market, I'm now focussing on gradually churning my portfolio to eliminate the less desirable loan parts, especially older/lower rate C and C-, to achieve a position where I could sell the majority of the portfolio fast if I needed cash.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Aug 29, 2014 7:26:11 GMT
I must be even dumber yet, since my losses are about 15% of my interest. Not two years yet though, and my lessons are learned _ gross yield is now 12.6%, fully diversified estimate now up to 9.3%. Good idea for as metric though!! Mine were hit by autobid duds and crappy scrappy and the big engineering loan 50% loss. Some recoveries still trickling in.
My actual annualized net return is rather, better owing to cash backs and flips.
|
|
|
Post by ranjeb on Aug 29, 2014 7:39:16 GMT
I guess I'm lucky, got 1 default in about 300 businesses over 2 years. I just use the information provided and gut feeling on some of the questions asked, haven't got time to do my own research and try and keep loans for duration. I trust in FC's claim as long as I keep my exposure to 1% I should achieve at least 7%.
|
|
blender
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 4,272
|
Post by blender on Aug 29, 2014 8:21:16 GMT
I've been using FC for around 18 months but it seems that I'm either not as lucky (or no doubt as clever) as blender. My percentage of unrecovered loss to gross interest (excluding cashbacks etc) is around 12%, despite a highly diversified portfolio.
I do not claim to have any special knowledge or abilities and just benefit from spending too much time churning loans and learning the ways of FC. Primarily my losses are low due to luck in having 45% recoveries - no way you can predict or control that - and without those recoveries my losses as a percentage of gross interest would be around 10%. As a diversity criminal I could be zapped hard tomorrow by failure of one of those long-term riskbandremoved loans. 10-12% is ok for an FC account. Losing 10% of gross interest is like losing approx 1% of capital, if your gross yield is 10%.
|
|
|
Post by patricko on Aug 29, 2014 10:11:45 GMT
The FC Statistics page shows several "Bad debt performance" graphs. All have one feature in common : a notable absence of bad debts in the first 5/6 months of a loans life. If patricko and ianb were acquiring loans at auction or buying only fresh loans on the secondary market, this could be relevant to their experience. That's an interesting point. Suggests that it might be a good policy to sell loan part after 5-6 months and use the funds to buy new parts at auction. All a bit time consuming though.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Aug 29, 2014 15:09:46 GMT
Looks pretty normal to me ... Lots of folks buying them for the 2% cash back, and then trying to pass them on. There are a couple of new ones which turned into loans recently, so the 'stock' of what is for sale probably went up a bit, but only a bit. Prices, as ever, range from 1.5% discount to as small markup.
|
|
mikeb
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 472
|
Post by mikeb on Aug 29, 2014 18:14:58 GMT
That's an interesting point. Suggests that it might be a good policy to sell loan part after 5-6 months and use the funds to buy new parts at auction. All a bit time consuming though.It is, but it's worthwhile. I've been with FC since Nov 2010. I used autobid at first, then realised it was not my friend, and went to manual bidding/secondary market purchases. First lesson learnt. Second lesson was realising that if FC keep downgrading and defaulting loans at the rate they are, this is not going to be worthwhile. So I started churning my loan book, with extreme prejudice The only loan parts I hold that are > 5-6 months are either a) secured on something, or b) already defaulted/downgraded and therefore unsaleable. I attempt to sell them at premium to manual buyers, but if not, at par to autobidders is fine. A lot of people haven't learnt lesson one (see above) ... This has noticeably improved things regarding bad debt, as has the increased rates on loans -- remember that we didn't always have the rates on offer now!
|
|
|
Post by davee39 on Aug 29, 2014 22:04:20 GMT
As above. Only a modest investment, but returning 12% after fees, the fees are more than covered by the small premiums sometimes available. I only get involved in larger loans and have a high minimum rate threshold. I also follow the diversity rule and immediately unload excess loan parts - I tend to cover a 0.5% range with 5 £20 bids, and sometimes the loans get accepted early so I end up with all of them. I have been selling after 3 months, sometimes earlier if better rates available on new loans.
I will be dis investing from Funding Secure and Saving Stream and re-investing in FC, which I think will be more secure longer term. I avoid property - I think the risks of default are far higher than FC is predicting.
|
|