sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Aug 28, 2018 13:31:27 GMT
Underwriters are just one of various funding methods AC employ. In fact I believe underwriters to be one of the smallest funding sources they use. Dev loans are carefully planned out with appropriate funding lined up to meet future tranches. To date traditional underwriting has never been used for later tranches on a dev loan so it is unlikely the discount situation on the loan in question will deteriorate dramatically or that future tranches can not be funded. For those that are interested, the loans with current discounts and amounts discounted are as follows:- Last I heard, it was believed that traditional underwriters are pretty far down the pecking order of funding methods AC employ (preferring to use "in-house" funding methods such as the cash reserve of the QAA/30DAA when possible). You claim that "To date traditional underwriting has never been used for later tranches on a dev loan"... so who is now offering an amount equivalent to more than the first additional tranche of #758 at a 1% discount if it was not a traditional underwriter? I too consider it unlikely that AC would so badly mismanage it that future tranches cannot be funded, but with so much of the marketplace seeming to be showing signs of stress, I definitely think it's a risk that should be borne in mind... especially given that some of the triggering factors are likely to be outside AC's control. It wasn't so long ago that a list of loans with current discounts would be nearly empty nearly all of the time, and it had seemed to me that AC had purposely designed it that way (a big leap between not discounted at all and the minimum allowable discount). I'm still buying up various discounted loan units, but now starting to become increasingly aware of the risk that liquidity may not return.
|
|
bg
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 1,929
|
Post by bg on Aug 28, 2018 13:39:40 GMT
You claim that "To date traditional underwriting has never been used for later tranches on a dev loan"... so who is now offering an amount equivalent to more than the first additional tranche of #758 at a 1% discount if it was not a traditional underwriter? The £275k offered at a discount in this loan is offered by traditional underwriters of the first drawdown. It is not related to the further drawdown on 21 Aug which was funded away from traditional underwriters.
|
|