|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 6, 2018 7:54:06 GMT
Don’t see this one ever being funded, even if CB is added. Point proven tonight. Just shy of £1million in tonight and this has barely moved. I don’t like to see MT wasting money in interest. Why hasn’t is been pulled? At current rates it would take 33 days to fill, not too excessive imo and thats without phone calls to BH's . I don't think this is actually too bad an offering, planing was rejected on an issue (flood plain) that has now been addressed and sentimental demand for this type of development is huge right now. So i can't see it being rejected outright, plus the land seems ideal for development and i think planing would want a development rather than oppose any kind of development. I'm in for a little bit, we shall see.
|
|
|
Post by Badly Drawn Stickman on Sept 6, 2018 9:06:49 GMT
Point proven tonight. Just shy of £1million in tonight and this has barely moved. I don’t like to see MT wasting money in interest. Why hasn’t is been pulled? At current rates it would take 33 days to fill, not too excessive imo and thats without phone calls to BH's . I don't think this is actually too bad an offering, planing was rejected on an issue (flood plain) that has now been addressed and sentimental demand for this type of development is huge right now. So i can't see it being rejected outright, plus the land seems ideal for development and i think planing would want a development rather than oppose any kind of development. I'm in for a little bit, we shall see. I always forget the bit where people just keep adding to their investments daily, 33 days it is then.
|
|
|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 6, 2018 14:22:17 GMT
£20,000 dropped, biggest i've seen yet
Edit : plus £4500, two deposits so £24500 over all
|
|
elliotn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 2,681
|
Post by elliotn on Sept 6, 2018 14:34:18 GMT
Point proven tonight. Just shy of £1million in tonight and this has barely moved. I don’t like to see MT wasting money in interest. Why hasn’t is been pulled? At current rates it would take 33 days to fill, not too excessive imo and thats without phone calls to BH's . I don't think this is actually too bad an offering, planing was rejected on an issue (flood plain) that has now been addressed and sentimental demand for this type of development is huge right now. So i can't see it being rejected outright, plus the land seems ideal for development and i think planing would want a development rather than oppose any kind of development. I'm in for a little bit, we shall see. Have a look at some of the councillor objections (as opposed to planning), can’t beat a bit of nimbyism.
|
|
|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 6, 2018 14:47:15 GMT
At current rates it would take 33 days to fill, not too excessive imo and thats without phone calls to BH's . I don't think this is actually too bad an offering, planing was rejected on an issue (flood plain) that has now been addressed and sentimental demand for this type of development is huge right now. So i can't see it being rejected outright, plus the land seems ideal for development and i think planing would want a development rather than oppose any kind of development. I'm in for a little bit, we shall see. Have a look at some of the councillor objections (as opposed to planning), can’t beat a bit of nimbyism. What document are you referring to ?
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on Sept 6, 2018 15:39:54 GMT
At current rates it would take 33 days to fill, not too excessive imo and thats without phone calls to BH's . I don't think this is actually too bad an offering, planing was rejected on an issue (flood plain) that has now been addressed and sentimental demand for this type of development is huge right now. So i can't see it being rejected outright, plus the land seems ideal for development and i think planing would want a development rather than oppose any kind of development. I'm in for a little bit, we shall see. Have a look at some of the councillor objections (as opposed to planning), can’t beat a bit of nimbyism. Those bloody disableds!! not in my back yard!! Appalling behaviour... In all seriousness nimbyism is ruining this country. tories gave into nimbyism regarding wind turbines and solar back in the Cameron years - renewables in this country would be far more advanced were it not for this kind of nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 6, 2018 18:34:14 GMT
Have a look at some of the councillor objections (as opposed to planning), can’t beat a bit of nimbyism. Those bloody disableds!! not in my back yard!! Appalling behaviour... In all seriousness nimbyism is ruining this country. tories gave into nimbyism regarding wind turbines and solar back in the Cameron years - renewables in this country would be far more advanced were it not for this kind of nonsense. Had a bit nimbyism near me. Protests against a 6,000 unit housing development, they were very well organised, marches, placards even trestle tables. They lost ......
|
|
johni
Member of DD Central
Posts: 365
Likes: 327
|
Post by johni on Sept 8, 2018 11:16:29 GMT
No this was the expected drawdown day. The last column still says no. The End date will change when the loan is drawndown.
|
|
m2btj
Member of DD Central
Posts: 626
Likes: 749
|
Post by m2btj on Sept 8, 2018 11:37:56 GMT
Have a look at some of the councillor objections (as opposed to planning), can’t beat a bit of nimbyism. Those bloody disableds!! not in my back yard!! Appalling behaviour... In all seriousness nimbyism is ruining this country. tories gave into nimbyism regarding wind turbines and solar back in the Cameron years - renewables in this country would be far more advanced were it not for this kind of nonsense. I completely disagree! Developers would concrete the whole country for profit if people didn't stand up to them. Quite often developers are working closely (I mean very closely ££) with councils & objectors don't stand a chance. Homes are being built that are completely unaffordable....there's no profit in cheap social housing! As for green energy that's a sector completely reliant on subsidy. Remove the subsidy & the sector collapses. Look at the now defunct AC green energy account! Investors are going to end up losing their capital! It wasn't long ago that solar panels were all the rage until the government subsidy (profit) was removed & the market went down the pan!
|
|
|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 8, 2018 15:22:30 GMT
Those bloody disableds!! not in my back yard!! Appalling behaviour... In all seriousness nimbyism is ruining this country. tories gave into nimbyism regarding wind turbines and solar back in the Cameron years - renewables in this country would be far more advanced were it not for this kind of nonsense. I completely disagree! Developers would concrete the whole country for profit if people didn't stand up to them. Quite often developers are working closely (I mean very closely ££) with councils & objectors don't stand a chance. Homes are being built that are completely unaffordable....there's no profit in cheap social housing! As for green energy that's a sector completely reliant on subsidy. Remove the subsidy & the sector collapses. Look at the now defunct AC green energy account! Investors are going to end up losing their capital! It wasn't long ago that solar panels were all the rage until the government subsidy (profit) was removed & the market went down the pan! Everything in moderation, if developers always folded to nimbyism nothing would ever be built. As a younger person it drives me mad with predominately an older generation 'protecting our views' while younger people end up on the street with no where to live. 99.9% of the country is/has been developed there is almost no where that is truly natural. I find it incredibly arrogant that one person would move in to an area and then try and dictate the development of that area over everybody else. Yes there should be limits on developments, of course, but the argument of 'preserving for the next generation' is often nonsense. Schools, hospitals, water treatment, power plants, housing, infrastructure and so would all serve the next generation to a greater immediate extent.
|
|
toast
Member of DD Central
Posts: 158
Likes: 90
|
Post by toast on Sept 8, 2018 17:04:12 GMT
99.9% of the country is/has been developed there is almost no where that is truly natural. Citation needed. This story estimated 5.9% of UK is developed upon: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41901294
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 1,835
|
Post by littleoldlady on Sept 8, 2018 17:31:23 GMT
99.9% of the country is/has been developed there is almost no where that is truly natural. Citation needed. This story estimated 5.9% of UK is developed upon: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41901294Well if you stretch the terms "developed" and "has been" then he is correct. Only ancient woodlands are still as they were before humans started changing the land. I suggest changing the law that says that land compulsorily purchased must be paid for as if PP were given, giving a windfall profit for the landowner. If councils could compulsorily purchase land at agricultural values plus a reasonable premium then grant PP for houses everyone would be a winner, the landowner (though not by as much), local council tax payers, people in need of housing. If challenged in Court the council would need to show that it had acted reasonably and that the homes were needed.
|
|
|
Post by Proptechfish on Sept 8, 2018 17:41:06 GMT
Well if you stretch the terms "developed" and "has been" then he is correct. Only ancient woodlands are still as they were before humans started changing the land. I suggest changing the law that says that land compulsorily purchased must be paid for as if PP were given, giving a windfall profit for the landowner. If councils could compulsorily purchase land at agricultural values plus a reasonable premium then grant PP for houses everyone would be a winner, the landowner (though not by as much), local council tax payers, people in need of housing. If challenged in Court the council would need to show that it had acted reasonably and that the homes were needed. Yes thats exactly what i'm referring to, we are just one generation of thousands living in an ever evolving landscape. The article is missing the point, 'developed' not 'built on'.
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on Sept 10, 2018 15:11:57 GMT
Those bloody disableds!! not in my back yard!! Appalling behaviour... In all seriousness nimbyism is ruining this country. tories gave into nimbyism regarding wind turbines and solar back in the Cameron years - renewables in this country would be far more advanced were it not for this kind of nonsense. I completely disagree! Developers would concrete the whole country for profit if people didn't stand up to them. Quite often developers are working closely (I mean very closely ££) with councils & objectors don't stand a chance. Homes are being built that are completely unaffordable....there's no profit in cheap social housing! As for green energy that's a sector completely reliant on subsidy. Remove the subsidy & the sector collapses. Look at the now defunct AC green energy account! Investors are going to end up losing their capital! It wasn't long ago that solar panels were all the rage until the government subsidy (profit) was removed & the market went down the pan! Several large scale solar farms have been built subsidy-free now. Cost efficiency will improve considerably with solar+storage developments too. Also wind power provided more leccy than any other source yesterday. It's the future. Edit: These two subjects also intersect - Subsidy on onshore wind and solar stopping was as much to do with appeasing middle england nimbyists as it was budgeting. Roof top solar will pick up again as prices come down and people discover the power of purchasing schemes. Govt green policy really is a mess - they basically don't have one past next April! As it stands those with solar installs on their roof won't even be paid for the power they export back to the grid...
|
|
7d7
Member of DD Central
Posts: 134
Likes: 205
|
Post by 7d7 on Sept 25, 2018 18:01:43 GMT
MoneyThing To generate further interest in this loan, would you consider: - halving the loan value? The 180 day Market Value is only £1.35M. - retaining interest for more than a year to cover possible extensions? As over-valuations are rife in the P2P industry, this seems a good opportunity to start vital adjustments to loan presentation in order to revitalise lending henceforth.
|
|