quidco
Member of DD Central
Posts: 294
Likes: 361
|
Post by quidco on Mar 27, 2019 17:57:56 GMT
In this regard Lendy have done well as they forced the borrower to put money at stake in order to continue.
|
|
Mucho P2P
Member of DD Central
Posts: 946
Likes: 1,635
|
Post by Mucho P2P on Mar 27, 2019 18:35:05 GMT
To the best of my knowledge, there is little of significance that has changed in the last few weeks. If the claimant leaves it late, and there is a hiccup of any sorts and not all the claim forms are emailed by the deadline, that will effectively dig her deeper into her hole as she will additionally have to explain why not everyone is being served, and why she left it so late. The Judge is already not satisfied with the continual delays, I can not fathom how the claimant would explain this additional delay to the Judge, having already been given 8+ weeks further to organise the claims form via email. You raise an interesting question: would the claimant be allowed to request additional time to serve the forms? Or is the 1st April a hard final deadline? its a hard final deadline for this case. The Judge did, however, grant her the right to start again if she so pleases. <---- there are "complications" in that move should she go down that route, so that is very unlikely to become reality.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,595
Likes: 5,017
|
Post by adrianc on Mar 27, 2019 19:14:46 GMT
You raise an interesting question: would the claimant be allowed to request additional time to serve the forms? Or is the 1st April a hard final deadline? Whatever they may or may not try, they're going to have to do a LOT of very convincing explanations as to why they couldn't possibly have met the original deadline. And the chances of that are roughly zero. (about the same as the chance of the case having any merit in the first place...)
|
|
lilo955
New Member
Posts: 3
Likes: 2
|
Post by lilo955 on Mar 28, 2019 8:45:50 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds.
|
|
Mucho P2P
Member of DD Central
Posts: 946
Likes: 1,635
|
Post by Mucho P2P on Mar 28, 2019 8:53:59 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds. Excellent news, if the borrower can not come up with the circa £300k for the first round, she is unlikely to come up with the full amount of circa £1.1m on time as will be required by the Court process.
|
|
|
Post by bl3nder on Mar 28, 2019 9:00:35 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds. Thanks for the information. Just to confirm, this is the funds for the case against Lendy? So this isn't directly related to the 1st April deadline for serving to the individual lenders?
|
|
oddis
Posts: 29
Likes: 14
|
Post by oddis on Mar 28, 2019 9:13:09 GMT
Yet another delaying tactic from the borrower. She had 2 months and one week to put this money to the Court!
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 6,674
|
Post by Mousey on Mar 28, 2019 9:22:37 GMT
Whilst I have no reason to doubt the latest update I can see no record of an order being generated from an appeal on the case logs nor any evidence of a hearing being held since January 2019 under the case name. I would be most grateful if the poster could provide a source.
|
|
|
Post by bl3nder on Mar 28, 2019 9:41:44 GMT
Yet another delaying tactic from the borrower. She had 2 months and one week to put this money to the Court! To be fair, it's not a trivial amount of money to put together. But saying that, they should have thought about that earlier. Good news for us though!
|
|
Mucho P2P
Member of DD Central
Posts: 946
Likes: 1,635
|
Post by Mucho P2P on Mar 28, 2019 9:45:46 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds. If true ( lilo995 please provide a source of info, even if by PM – thx), it is nothing more than a delay tactic. The claimant/UBO has a demonstratable history (as shown by multiple internet searches) of histrionics, this is in line with her policy of “attrition” in each case the UBO has been involved in. We all know she has in excess of £6m of OUR funds hidden away behind several nominee companies. If she dips into the £6m for the SoC, then her lawyers will also want their share NOW. So she cannot touch it. She touches it, and the hidden location of funds is identified, so that when Lendy wins, there is a trace back to the funds for damages, which she does not wish for. Conclusion, she is still between a rock and a hard place (facts of the case have not changed), even if she stumps up the SoC.
|
|
lilo955
New Member
Posts: 3
Likes: 2
|
Post by lilo955 on Mar 28, 2019 10:04:40 GMT
There is a website called Justice UK that tracks Civil Appeals - all public info.
|
|
|
Post by bl3nder on Mar 28, 2019 10:04:50 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds. If true ( Ilio995 please provide a source of info, even if by PM – thx), it is nothing more than a delay tactic. The claimant/UBO has a demonstratable history (as shown by multiple internet searches) of histrionics, this is in line with her policy of “attrition” in each case the UBO has been involved in. We all know she has in excess of £6m of OUR funds hidden away behind several nominee companies. If she dips into the £6m for the SoC, then her lawyers will also want their share NOW. So she cannot touch it. She touches it, and the hidden location of funds is identified, so that when Lendy wins, there is a trace back to the funds for damages, which she does not wish for. Conclusion, she is still between a rock and a hard place (facts of the case have not changed), even if she stumps up the SoC. Very interesting and positive info for us, thanks! Just a minor point: I'm assuming you mean lilo955 rather than me for the info source?
|
|
Mucho P2P
Member of DD Central
Posts: 946
Likes: 1,635
|
Post by Mucho P2P on Mar 28, 2019 10:08:55 GMT
If true ( Ilio995 please provide a source of info, even if by PM – thx), it is nothing more than a delay tactic. The claimant/UBO has a demonstratable history (as shown by multiple internet searches) of histrionics, this is in line with her policy of “attrition” in each case the UBO has been involved in. We all know she has in excess of £6m of OUR funds hidden away behind several nominee companies. If she dips into the £6m for the SoC, then her lawyers will also want their share NOW. So she cannot touch it. She touches it, and the hidden location of funds is identified, so that when Lendy wins, there is a trace back to the funds for damages, which she does not wish for. Conclusion, she is still between a rock and a hard place (facts of the case have not changed), even if she stumps up the SoC. Very interesting and positive info for us, thanks! Just a minor point: I'm assuming you mean lilo955 rather than me for the info source? Yes, my initial oversight, I meant lilo955 and not you - my apologies.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,595
Likes: 5,017
|
Post by adrianc on Mar 28, 2019 10:08:56 GMT
Just so everyone knows - the borrower submitted an application to appeal the latest order granted by the Judge stipulating the time period for lodging the relevant monies at court. It is clear from publically available sources that that appeal has been heard although I am unaware of the outcome although given the content of that order I suspect the rationale for that appeal must be that the borrower is unable to come up with the funds. Thanks for the information. Just to confirm, this is the funds for the case against Lendy? So this isn't directly related to the 1st April deadline for serving to the individual lenders? AIUI - and I'm more than happy to be corrected - the 1st April deadline is for both serving and lodging the funds. To serve, she must lodge the funds.
|
|
Mucho P2P
Member of DD Central
Posts: 946
Likes: 1,635
|
Post by Mucho P2P on Mar 28, 2019 10:10:18 GMT
There is a website called Justice UK that tracks Civil Appeals - all public info. Appreciate that, might we have a date please, many thanks
|
|