IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 3,008
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 6, 2019 14:37:15 GMT
Danish Prime Minister said yesterday that the British public had been taken in by “some rhetorically skilled politicians who turned out to be untrustworthy conmen who subsequently left the sinking ship”.Boris Johnson, whatever happened to him? Is he going to vote for Vassal State? Gotta love straight talking Scandis
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Mar 6, 2019 19:38:56 GMT
But Lord Stevens told the BBC: "I don't think she listens, quite frankly, to what she's being told."
No s**t Sherlock. And now for the news.....
|
|
cb25
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 2,668
|
Post by cb25 on Mar 7, 2019 8:18:22 GMT
"Theresa May’s Cabinet is resigned to her Brexit deal being defeated by up to 100 votes next week after talks in Brussels collapsed without progress on Wednesday. Downing Street is already making plans for a third “meaningful vote” on the deal on the assumption that Tuesday’s vote is lost, and Mrs May is considering making a major speech on Friday to plead for support from MPs."
|
|
travolta
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 1,191
|
Post by travolta on Mar 7, 2019 9:17:52 GMT
|
|
cb25
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 2,668
|
Post by cb25 on Mar 7, 2019 9:23:23 GMT
or how about:
or
"The Bank of England warned in November 2018 that a no-deal Brexit would cause a loss of economic growth of between 4.75% and 7.75% in the three years afterwards, compared to the deal offered by the Prime Minister.
However, Mr Carney has revised this. He told the committee that thanks to contingency planning he expected the damage to be reduced to just 2.75% lower economic growth in the three years after Brexit in the best-case scenario."
|
|
travolta
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 1,191
|
Post by travolta on Mar 7, 2019 9:26:51 GMT
or how about:
or
"The Bank of England warned in November 2018 that a no-deal Brexit would cause a loss of economic growth of between 4.75% and 7.75% in the three years afterwards, compared to the deal offered by the Prime Minister.
However, Mr Carney has revised this. He told the committee that thanks to contingency planning he expected the damage to be reduced to just 2.75% lower economic growth in the three years after Brexit in the best-case scenario."
The crossword is usually quite good too.
|
|
|
Post by captainconfident on Mar 7, 2019 9:54:34 GMT
You two are sort of humming to yourselves to keep your spirits up, but you know the game's up.
|
|
travolta
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 1,191
|
Post by travolta on Mar 7, 2019 10:15:33 GMT
No . its just that remainers are so easy to tease and brexiteers have the Kipling streak that seems to enrage them. We can have our cake AND eat it.
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 3,008
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 7, 2019 11:10:21 GMT
or how about:
or
"The Bank of England warned in November 2018 that a no-deal Brexit would cause a loss of economic growth of between 4.75% and 7.75% in the three years afterwards, compared to the deal offered by the Prime Minister.
However, Mr Carney has revised this. He told the committee that thanks to contingency planning he expected the damage to be reduced to just 2.75% lower economic growth in the three years after Brexit in the best-case scenario."
The crossword is usually quite good too. Oh, that's fine then. Employees of Sony, Ford, Honda, Panasonic, Unilever, Barclays, Diageo, HSBC, Bank of America, Nissan, Panasonic, Schaeffler, Airbus, Dyson, Philips, UBS, Hitachi, Jaguar Land Rover and BMW who will be losing their jobs might disagree though. And its not only a 3 year effect - didn't JRM say it could take 50 years to see the benefits?
|
|
cb25
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 2,668
|
Post by cb25 on Mar 7, 2019 11:44:16 GMT
The crossword is usually quite good too. Oh, that's fine then. Employees of Sony, Ford, Honda, Panasonic, Unilever, Barclays, Diageo, HSBC, Bank of America, Nissan, Panasonic, Schaeffler, Airbus, Dyson, Philips, UBS, Hitachi, Jaguar Land Rover and BMW who will be losing their jobs might disagree though. And its not only a 3 year effect - didn't JRM say it could take 50 years to see the benefits?
I guess Remainers don't focus on that as it's not something they can blame on Brexit.
---
"Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the Commons, has just confirmed that MPs will vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal on Tuesday next week.
She said that, if the government loses the vote, she will make a further business statement on Tuesday about how the government will allow a vote on a no-deal Brexit, followed by a vote on extending article 50 if no deal gets rejected.
But she did not say, as May originally proposed, that the no-deal vote would be on the Wednesday and the article 50 extension debate on Thursday. That could be a hint that both of those votes might take place on Wednesday, as Laura Kuenssberg suggested last night."
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 3,008
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 7, 2019 13:41:17 GMT
Oh, that's fine then. Employees of Sony, Ford, Honda, Panasonic, Unilever, Barclays, Diageo, HSBC, Bank of America, Nissan, Panasonic, Schaeffler, Airbus, Dyson, Philips, UBS, Hitachi, Jaguar Land Rover and BMW who will be losing their jobs might disagree though. And its not only a 3 year effect - didn't JRM say it could take 50 years to see the benefits?
I guess Remainers don't focus on that as it's not something they can blame on Brexit.
---
"Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the Commons, has just confirmed that MPs will vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal on Tuesday next week.
She said that, if the government loses the vote, she will make a further business statement on Tuesday about how the government will allow a vote on a no-deal Brexit, followed by a vote on extending article 50 if no deal gets rejected.
But she did not say, as May originally proposed, that the no-deal vote would be on the Wednesday and the article 50 extension debate on Thursday. That could be a hint that both of those votes might take place on Wednesday, as Laura Kuenssberg suggested last night."
What - you're seriously saying that Brexit has or will create more jobs than if we didn't Brexit? Really?
|
|
cb25
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 2,668
|
Post by cb25 on Mar 7, 2019 13:52:50 GMT
I guess Remainers don't focus on that as it's not something they can blame on Brexit.
---
"Andrea Leadsom, the leader of the Commons, has just confirmed that MPs will vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal on Tuesday next week.
She said that, if the government loses the vote, she will make a further business statement on Tuesday about how the government will allow a vote on a no-deal Brexit, followed by a vote on extending article 50 if no deal gets rejected.
But she did not say, as May originally proposed, that the no-deal vote would be on the Wednesday and the article 50 extension debate on Thursday. That could be a hint that both of those votes might take place on Wednesday, as Laura Kuenssberg suggested last night."
What - you're seriously saying that Brexit has or will create more jobs than if we didn't Brexit? Really? I wasn't making any statement about Brexit's effect on jobs, simply using the article by the ONS to draw attention to the fact (which in retrospect I should have highlighted) that the employment rate is "the joint-highest since comparable estimates began in 1971".
People lose/gain jobs all the time, it goes with capitalism, we should concentrate on the big picture and it's a lot rosier than Remainers would have us believe.
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 3,008
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 7, 2019 15:08:35 GMT
What - you're seriously saying that Brexit has or will create more jobs than if we didn't Brexit? Really? I wasn't making any statement about Brexit's effect on jobs, simply using the article by the ONS to draw attention to the fact (which in retrospect I should have highlighted) that the employment rate is "the joint-highest since comparable estimates began in 1971".
People lose/gain jobs all the time, it goes with capitalism, we should concentrate on the big picture and it's a lot rosier than Remainers would have us believe.
They don't lose them all at the same time in this way usually, in the absence of a recession. Look, you don't have to say all is doom and gloom to say that things are worse because of Brexit. They just are. Things are not terrible (although they might be under a no deal scenario in 22 days time), but they would be better (economically, and jobswise at the very least) if we didn't Brexit and didn't have this ridiculous uncertainty and indecision about where we are heading. I thought it was now common ground amongst rational Brexiteers that we will lose GDP (and hence jobs and/or income) but that that is a price worth paying for the return of sovereignty and of gaining control over EU immigration?
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 4,382
|
Post by agent69 on Mar 7, 2019 15:23:32 GMT
and didn't have this ridiculous uncertainty and indecision about where we are heading. Oh the irony of it all.
Can't you see that the uncertainty and indecision is caused by people like you who will not accept the results of a democratic referendum. If all the remoaners had got behind brexit we would have gone (and the uncertainty ended) a long time ago.
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,683
Likes: 3,008
|
Post by IFISAcava on Mar 7, 2019 15:26:08 GMT
and didn't have this ridiculous uncertainty and indecision about where we are heading. Oh the irony of it all.
Can't you see that the uncertainty and indecision is caused by people like you who will not accept the results of a democratic referendum. If all the remoaners had got behind brexit we would have gone (and the uncertainty ended) a long time ago.
Ah yes, I forgot that Brexiteers take no responsibility for their actions
|
|