Another case of unravelling the back story - there is a "family house" occupied by the applicant (who may or may not have a financial interest in it) not specifically identified as different from the investment property because the Profile uses the words "ownership of a property" [singular]. Can't for the life of me see why Rebs don't insist that the true assets and liabilities are laid bare upfront. Same problem with two charges highlighted by @dodgeydave [thanks mate]. They currently remain on public records, so they would be found eventually. It would also be a comfort to be told the actual trading address, as 124 L***** S***** looks unlikely on Google Street View!