jlend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1,465
|
Post by jlend on Jul 4, 2023 7:14:46 GMT
PF figures have been updated by AC for anyone interested
Only the QAA has figures now as at 30 April 2023
"Merged with Quick Access Account" for 30DAA and 90DAA
|
|
loadsahope
Member of DD Central
Posts: 84
Likes: 44
|
Post by loadsahope on Jul 4, 2023 8:08:25 GMT
I'm obviously looking in the wrong place as I can't see it. Can you share a link please?
|
|
jlend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1,465
|
Post by jlend on Jul 4, 2023 8:34:43 GMT
|
|
loadsahope
Member of DD Central
Posts: 84
Likes: 44
|
Post by loadsahope on Jul 4, 2023 14:58:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bob2010 on Jul 4, 2023 15:23:37 GMT
So, if I'm getting this right, the amount left is to cover defaults after June 1st, because anything before May 31st would have been ring-fenced?
|
|
|
Post by Ace on Jul 4, 2023 15:50:56 GMT
So, if I'm getting this right, the amount left is to cover defaults after June 1st, because anything before May 31st would have been ring-fenced? The provision fund data is as at 30th April 2023.
|
|
|
Post by bob2010 on Jul 4, 2023 16:02:11 GMT
So, if I'm getting this right, the amount left is to cover defaults after June 1st, because anything before May 31st would have been ring-fenced? The provision fund data is as at 30th April 2023. Thanks but is that correct based on 1 May onwards?
|
|
|
Post by Ace on Jul 4, 2023 16:07:16 GMT
The provision fund data is as at 30th April 2023. Thanks but is that correct based on 1 May onwards? The amount reserved and taken out isn't to cover defaults, it's too cover expected losses. It's perfectly possible for there to be many defaults that aren't expected to result in losses. But, yes, otherwise correct.
|
|
jlend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1,465
|
Post by jlend on Jul 4, 2023 16:57:40 GMT
“Ring-fencing” in the Provision Funds relating to the Access Accounts
The Assetz Capital Access Accounts prioritise liquidity and consistency of interest payments and seek to avoid, where possible, situations where lenders are unable to withdraw their funds in normal market conditions. For this reason, all loans remain tradeable within the Access Accounts and all Access Account users participate equally in every loan held within the relevant account. This means that lenders will own parts of loans which may be in difficulty or even in default. To treat lenders fairly and to avoid situations where a lender might join a loan which may already be facing a loss, the discretionary decision for Access Account loans is taken immediately once:
• The loan defaults, or;
• Assetz Capital considers that the borrower is unlikely to pay its obligations under the P2P agreement in full, without the firm enforcing any relevant security interest or taking other steps with analogous effect, or;
• The loan is subject to a Monitoring Event and/or a capital value discount has been disclosed on the loan record.
In relation to the first two categories, if there is sufficient money within the relevant Provision Fund to fully cover the assessment of the Loss Given Default (“LGD”) on such a loan the discretionary decision to cover that loss is taken immediately and the LGD amount is “ring-fenced” (i.e.: set aside specifically to cover any actual loss arising from that loan). In relation to loans in the third category, if there is sufficient money within the relevant Provision Fund to cover the assessment of the higher of the Expected Loss (“EL”) or the capital value discount disclosed on such a loan, the discretionary decision is taken immediately and the relevant amount is ring-fenced.
“Ring-fenced” amounts are not included in the available funds for the Provision Funds as they are no longer available, having been allocated against the loan in question. Should the loan recover and become a fully performing loan again (perhaps because the borrower corrects the issues which caused the loan to default or to be monitored) the “ring-fenced” funds can be released and become available funds within the Provision Fund once more.
If there is not sufficient money within the relevant Provision Fund to fully cover the assessment of the Loss Given Default or Expected Loss/capital value discount then the loan will not be allowed to trade within the Access Accounts, thereby preventing lenders from gaining or increasing a holding in a loan which is in difficulty and which may ultimately face a loss.
|
|
bk
New Member
Posts: 4
Likes: 2
|
Post by bk on Aug 30, 2023 13:59:06 GMT
As an AC investor with money in the instant access account which now appears to be tied up for years.
I have made a complaint to them about their actions and was wondering now if there is any point in raising a complaint with the financial ombudsman? Will this help in any way?
|
|
jlend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1,465
|
Post by jlend on Aug 31, 2023 11:12:09 GMT
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,315
Likes: 11,523
|
Post by ilmoro on Dec 11, 2023 11:12:42 GMT
PF figures have been updated to end of Oct.
Slight increase in the fund (£20k) probably as a result of full recovery of defaulted loan(s) allowing transferring of funds ringfenced to cover a predicted loss back into the fund.
Too early for any benefit from reduction in fee to reflect in the figures
|
|
|
Post by bob2010 on Oct 1, 2024 7:04:39 GMT
Considering the interest payments have switched to cash basis, what is the purpose of the provision fund now? Surely it would make more sense to distribute the full interest to all investors, considering the provision fund should eventually pay out anyway. I just can't make sense of it's purpose now.
|
|