|
Post by bracknellboy on Dec 12, 2014 19:46:22 GMT
It looks like AC's website needs correcting then:
FAQ > Investors > How do I calculate my tax liability?
"Any interest earned from any loan is treated as investment income by the tax man. The return you receive on your investment with Assetz Capital is paid gross; no tax is deducted “at source” by peer-to-peer lending platforms. Our investors are responsible for the payment of any tax due of them to HM Revenue & Customs. Tax will be payable at your marginal rate."
May well do: but to be fair its clear that AC have been caught somewhat cold by this, and appear to be the first p2p to have had a borrower take this line. Aside from an argument that perhaps one might have expected that their contract documents would have insisted on gross payment to ensure they had equivalence of contracts (implied in the case of an FAQ), but an argument which is undermined anyway since you can't enforce a contract which is contrary to law, they seem to have handled this situation pretty well to date, including suspending of trading while they discussed the situation with the borrower, an action which as I recall some people here beat them up over.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Dec 12, 2014 19:48:43 GMT
I've taken a look at the newly revised Tax Statement and have a couple of problems... - Most importantly, the information provided is not consistent with the information required by the SA tax return form. That form does not ask for total interest earned and total tax retained, so there is no place to enter the numbers now being provided. The form asks that the amounts of taxed and untaxed interest earned be entered separately. It presumes that any 'taxed' interest has had 20% tax retained, and that any untaxed interest has had no tax retained. While I accept that I could take the number shown as tax retained and multiply it by five to produce a number to report as my taxed interest earned, and then subtract that from my total interest earned to produce a number to report as my untaxed interest earned, I really don't think I -- or my accountant -- should be required to make those calculations. And I can pretty well guarantee that a goodly number of AC's lenders will not understand the situation well enough to produce the correct numbers to report to HMRC. I therefore would urge AC to revise the Tax Statement to divide a lender's interest into the taxed and untaxed portions and therefore provide numbers that can be given to HMRC without having to be massaged first.
- I note that the amount of tax retained is described as "The amount of tax we’ve retained and paid to HMRC for this period." AIUI, it was the borrower that retained the tax and paid it to HMRC, so that statement is not correct. When completing a SA return, the taxpayer generally has to supply only the total amounts to report, but they have to keep records of the payers of all the individual items that go into those totals, and HMRC can ask for those details if they wish to do so. I presume that's so that they can cross-check to see that those who have retained tax have actually paid that money across to HMRC. I therefore believe that I need to have from AC an itemised list of the borrowers who have retained tax rather than just a total reported as being retained by AC. To be honest, I'd think that AC's tax advisers/ accountants really wouldn't want lenders to be telling HMRC that AC had retained tax and paid it across to HMRC if that's not really the case. I can imagine HMRC coming to AC and asking to see evidence of all that tax retained having been forwarded to HMRC and that could put AC into a rather awkward position.
I suspect these are items that chris needs to take up with the Admin people who specify what info they need the website to supply to lenders.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Dec 12, 2014 19:54:45 GMT
mikes1531 - as I'm sure you can appreciate we've had very little time (today basically) to implement the technical solution to this so haven't had time to go through items like this thoroughly. As I mentioned in a previous post I'm happy to work with you guys to make the statement as easy for you as possible. The information you've outlined is all already captured by the system so can be produced automatically.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Dec 12, 2014 20:09:50 GMT
I've taken a look at the newly revised Tax Statement and have a couple of problems... - Most importantly, the information provided is not consistent with the information required by the SA tax return form. That form does not ask for total interest earned and total tax retained, so there is no place to enter the numbers now being provided. The form asks that the amounts of taxed and untaxed interest earned be entered separately. It presumes that any 'taxed' interest has had 20% tax retained, and that any untaxed interest has had no tax retained. While I accept that I could take the number shown as tax retained and multiply it by five to produce a number to report as my taxed interest earned, and then subtract that from my total interest earned to produce a number to report as my untaxed interest earned, I really don't think I -- or my accountant -- should be required to make those calculations. And I can pretty well guarantee that a goodly number of AC's lenders will not understand the situation well enough to produce the correct numbers to report to HMRC. I therefore would urge AC to revise the Tax Statement to divide a lender's interest into the taxed and untaxed portions and therefore provide numbers that can be given to HMRC without having to be massaged first.
- I note that the amount of tax retained is described as "The amount of tax we’ve retained and paid to HMRC for this period." AIUI, it was the borrower that retained the tax and paid it to HMRC, so that statement is not correct. When completing a SA return, the taxpayer generally has to supply only the total amounts to report, but they have to keep records of the payers of all the individual items that go into those totals, and HMRC can ask for those details if they wish to do so. I presume that's so that they can cross-check to see that those who have retained tax have actually paid that money across to HMRC. I therefore believe that I need to have from AC an itemised list of the borrowers who have retained tax rather than just a total reported as being retained by AC. To be honest, I'd think that AC's tax advisers/ accountants really wouldn't want lenders to be telling HMRC that AC had retained tax and paid it across to HMRC if that's not really the case. I can imagine HMRC coming to AC and asking to see evidence of all that tax retained having been forwarded to HMRC and that could put AC into a rather awkward position.
I suspect these are items that chris needs to take up with the Admin people who specify what info they need the website to supply to lenders.
mikes1531 - It looks like it could be a mess but fortunately at this stage only this company has decided it needs to withhold interest. All of the upcoming loans show repayments being made gross so whilst I take on board what andrewholgate mentioned earlier - something about having clever accountants or words to that effect, the cynical side of me tells me something else. What I find more annoying is that this will impact returns more than just the 20%. Tax due on earnings for the year 14-15 are not due until my accountant submits my return in early 2016. So if I invested in this particular loan or any other that decided to withhold tax, I do not have the use of that money for other investments. One thing is certain, borrowers that do withhold tax will find their proposals less attractive to lenders/investors that do not. I have no idea how often this particular borrower is required to actually pay the withholding tax. Is it annual, quarterly or what have you. One thing is certain is that it will not be on the same day that they withhold it. Point of principle on my part - yes it is. I just hope that companies that currently pay gross that I have investments in do not suddenly change the 'rules' and decide to pay net as that is their apparent right to do so.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Dec 12, 2014 20:11:40 GMT
mikes1531 - as I'm sure you can appreciate we've had very little time (today basically) to implement the technical solution to this so haven't had time to go through items like this thoroughly. As I mentioned in a previous post I'm happy to work with you guys to make the statement as easy for you as possible. The information you've outlined is all already captured by the system so can be produced automatically. No laughing matter chris but with everything else going on I'm pleased not to be head of IT like yourself. Now go home!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by andrewholgate on Dec 12, 2014 20:16:13 GMT
I've taken a look at the newly revised Tax Statement and have a couple of problems... - Most importantly, the information provided is not consistent with the information required by the SA tax return form. That form does not ask for total interest earned and total tax retained, so there is no place to enter the numbers now being provided. The form asks that the amounts of taxed and untaxed interest earned be entered separately. It presumes that any 'taxed' interest has had 20% tax retained, and that any untaxed interest has had no tax retained. While I accept that I could take the number shown as tax retained and multiply it by five to produce a number to report as my taxed interest earned, and then subtract that from my total interest earned to produce a number to report as my untaxed interest earned, I really don't think I -- or my accountant -- should be required to make those calculations. And I can pretty well guarantee that a goodly number of AC's lenders will not understand the situation well enough to produce the correct numbers to report to HMRC. I therefore would urge AC to revise the Tax Statement to divide a lender's interest into the taxed and untaxed portions and therefore provide numbers that can be given to HMRC without having to be massaged first.
- I note that the amount of tax retained is described as "The amount of tax we’ve retained and paid to HMRC for this period." AIUI, it was the borrower that retained the tax and paid it to HMRC, so that statement is not correct. When completing a SA return, the taxpayer generally has to supply only the total amounts to report, but they have to keep records of the payers of all the individual items that go into those totals, and HMRC can ask for those details if they wish to do so. I presume that's so that they can cross-check to see that those who have retained tax have actually paid that money across to HMRC. I therefore believe that I need to have from AC an itemised list of the borrowers who have retained tax rather than just a total reported as being retained by AC. To be honest, I'd think that AC's tax advisers/ accountants really wouldn't want lenders to be telling HMRC that AC had retained tax and paid it across to HMRC if that's not really the case. I can imagine HMRC coming to AC and asking to see evidence of all that tax retained having been forwarded to HMRC and that could put AC into a rather awkward position.
I suspect these are items that chris needs to take up with the Admin people who specify what info they need the website to supply to lenders.
mikes1531 - It looks like it could be a mess but fortunately at this stage only this company has decided it needs to withhold interest. All of the upcoming loans show repayments being made gross so whilst I take on board what andrewholgate mentioned earlier - something about having clever accountants or words to that effect, the cynical side of me tells me something else. What I find more annoying is that this will impact returns more than just the 20%. Tax due on earnings for the year 14-15 are not due until my accountant submits my return in early 2016. So if I invested in this particular loan or any other that decided to withhold tax, I do not have the use of that money for other investments. One thing is certain, borrowers that do withhold tax will find their proposals less attractive to lenders/investors that do not. I have no idea how often this particular borrower is required to actually pay the withholding tax. Is it annual, quarterly or what have you. One thing is certain is that it will not be on the same day that they withhold it. Point of principle on my part - yes it is. I just hope that companies that currently pay gross that I have investments in do not suddenly change the 'rules' and decide to pay net as that is their apparent right to do so. They have to pay it as soon as they withhold it.
|
|
|
Post by chris on Dec 12, 2014 20:18:11 GMT
mikes1531 - as I'm sure you can appreciate we've had very little time (today basically) to implement the technical solution to this so haven't had time to go through items like this thoroughly. As I mentioned in a previous post I'm happy to work with you guys to make the statement as easy for you as possible. The information you've outlined is all already captured by the system so can be produced automatically. No laughing matter chris but with everything else going on I'm pleased not to be head of IT like yourself. Now go home!!!!! I've been home all day
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Dec 12, 2014 20:19:00 GMT
mikes1531 - It looks like it could be a mess but fortunately at this stage only this company has decided it needs to withhold interest. All of the upcoming loans show repayments being made gross so whilst I take on board what andrewholgate mentioned earlier - something about having clever accountants or words to that effect, the cynical side of me tells me something else. What I find more annoying is that this will impact returns more than just the 20%. Tax due on earnings for the year 14-15 are not due until my accountant submits my return in early 2016. So if I invested in this particular loan or any other that decided to withhold tax, I do not have the use of that money for other investments. One thing is certain, borrowers that do withhold tax will find their proposals less attractive to lenders/investors that do not. I have no idea how often this particular borrower is required to actually pay the withholding tax. Is it annual, quarterly or what have you. One thing is certain is that it will not be on the same day that they withhold it. Point of principle on my part - yes it is. I just hope that companies that currently pay gross that I have investments in do not suddenly change the 'rules' and decide to pay net as that is their apparent right to do so. They have to pay it as soon as they withhold it. andrewholgate - okay, I stand corrected. Balmy tax system needs to go on a bonfire somewhere!
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Dec 12, 2014 20:23:59 GMT
No laughing matter chris but with everything else going on I'm pleased not to be head of IT like yourself. Now go home!!!!! I've been home all day Good - well I'm off to watch some TV - had enough of this crazy tax discussion which is outside of everyone's control. Think I'll buy a boat and float around the oceans to get away from all tax legislation.
|
|
unmadem
Member of DD Central
Posts: 377
Likes: 181
|
Post by unmadem on Dec 12, 2014 20:32:03 GMT
mikes1531 - as I'm sure you can appreciate we've had very little time (today basically) to implement the technical solution to this so haven't had time to go through items like this thoroughly. As I mentioned in a previous post I'm happy to work with you guys to make the statement as easy for you as possible. The information you've outlined is all already captured by the system so can be produced automatically. No laughing matter chris but with everything else going on I'm pleased not to be head of IT like yourself. Now go home!!!!! yeah, must be a nightmare. Just when things were quietening down too. Good luck.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Dec 12, 2014 20:43:51 GMT
... they seem to have handled this situation pretty well to date, including suspending of trading while they discussed the situation with the borrower... Now that all the information is out in the open, why is this loan still suspended from trading on the Aftermarket? Edit: yes, I guess AC could be the conduit and redact details of the tax certificate. I'm not sure that would work because, AIUI, I'm obliged to keep records of who pays me interest. And while exemptions for P2P might have made it possible for the platform to aggregate all my borrowers and report to me the total so that I'm OK to simply record the interest as having originated from the platform, I wonder if that would still work when there's retained tax involved, since HMRC will want to assure themselves that they really did receive that tax payment. But I suppose if they ask me to supply details, I simply point them in AC's direction and tell them that's where they can get whatever info they want because AC never supplied it to me. What a can of worms!
|
|
|
Post by chris on Dec 12, 2014 21:10:12 GMT
... they seem to have handled this situation pretty well to date, including suspending of trading while they discussed the situation with the borrower... Now that all the information is out in the open, why is this loan still suspended from trading on the Aftermarket? We're discussing the best way of making sure that new lenders and those that aren't on the forum do not buy into the loan without knowing. We'll keep things as they are over the weekend and decide internally on where the warning should sit on the page, what it should say, etc. We'll also be keeping the loan out of the GEIA or the time being due to the complications of the tax treatment and the provision fund.
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Dec 12, 2014 23:57:03 GMT
Our tax certificates will show the gross interest received on all loans, tax deducted across all loans, and therefore the net interest received across all loans. As I recall, that isn't the information that I'd need for the tax return... There are two separate boxes - one for interest received gross, and one for interest received net of 20% withholding tax. The totals I would need would therefore be: 1. Total Gross interest received on all loans for which there was no deduction 2. Total Net interest received on all loans for which there was a deduction. Edit: I'm also pretty sure that HMRC doesn't accept payments of a fraction of a penny (or where applicable provide refunds of such fractions) - my statement currently shows £0.045 of tax having been retained, so I'd guess the relevant entries will need to be adjusted so that AC and/or the borrower retain only whole pennies of interest according to the relevant tax rules.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 6,953
|
Post by duck on Dec 13, 2014 5:29:49 GMT
Just for info chris, having looked at my personal and business accounts your fast implemented net/gross taxation split appears to be working correctly. Impressed with the way this is being handled.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Dec 13, 2014 8:16:52 GMT
...I'm also pretty sure that HMRC doesn't accept payments of a fraction of a penny (or where applicable provide refunds of such fractions) - my statement currently shows £0.045 of tax having been retained, so I'd guess the relevant entries will need to be adjusted so that AC and/or the borrower retain only whole pennies of interest according to the relevant tax rules. Everything in the tax return should be rounded to whole pounds anyway so the fractions of a penny are hardly an issue.
|
|