IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 2,992
|
Post by IFISAcava on Feb 12, 2024 15:36:49 GMT
It is understood that the judgment will be handed down on Friday Feb 23rd in a remote hearing. Mousey , do you know if one can get access to this particular session? Presumably its the same email as before? chancery.mastersappointments@justice.gov.uk
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,588
|
Post by Mousey on Feb 12, 2024 16:48:39 GMT
Yeah it'll be a public hearing.
And yeah that's the e-mail.
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,925
Likes: 2,774
|
Post by michaelc on Feb 12, 2024 20:49:31 GMT
If I wanted to view the hearing from the internet "public gallery" presumably view a video link, how would I do that ?
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 2,992
|
Post by IFISAcava on Feb 12, 2024 21:26:11 GMT
If I wanted to view the hearing from the internet "public gallery" presumably view a video link, how would I do that ? email the day before and they should send you a link. Remember to keep you video and mike off though - judges get really grumpy!
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,925
Likes: 2,774
|
Post by michaelc on Feb 12, 2024 21:50:15 GMT
Thanks for that. Do I need to provide the time/date or any reference number or parties ?
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 2,992
|
Post by IFISAcava on Feb 13, 2024 10:17:24 GMT
Thanks for that. Do I need to provide the time/date or any reference number or parties ? case reference: FS-2019-000004
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,588
|
Post by Mousey on Feb 13, 2024 10:25:12 GMT
Remember to keep you video and mike off though - judges get really grumpy! I have no idea what you mean!
|
|
|
Post by investor1925 on Feb 15, 2024 10:15:21 GMT
It is understood that the judgment will be handed down on Friday Feb 23rd in a remote hearing. Hopefully it'll all be finished before the 5th anniversary, or am I dreaming ?
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 2,992
|
Post by IFISAcava on Feb 15, 2024 12:24:26 GMT
It is understood that the judgment will be handed down on Friday Feb 23rd in a remote hearing. Hopefully it'll all be finished before the 5th anniversary, or am I dreaming ? no chance
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,235
Likes: 6,038
|
Post by registerme on Feb 16, 2024 16:16:45 GMT
So...?
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,588
|
Post by Mousey on Feb 17, 2024 11:59:43 GMT
I understand the borrower has another court appearance on Tuesday
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 3,138
|
Post by jonno on Feb 18, 2024 10:51:20 GMT
I understand the borrower has another court appearance on Tuesday @mousey. A bit too cryptic for my little head. Could you be more explicit?
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,644
Likes: 4,214
|
Post by agent69 on Feb 18, 2024 12:23:51 GMT
I understand the borrower has another court appearance on Tuesday Does this man have any time for a day job, or is he a professional litigant?
|
|
DeafEater
Member of DD Central
Extremely Moderate
Posts: 218
Likes: 292
|
Post by DeafEater on Feb 18, 2024 13:28:50 GMT
I understand the borrower has another court appearance on Tuesday Does this man have any time for a day job, or is he a professional litigant? I think 'persistent' rather than 'professional'...
|
|
Mousey
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 6,588
|
Post by Mousey on Feb 24, 2024 17:55:11 GMT
Solicitor makes even more "scandalous allegations", High Court told, as it's ruled he doesn't have to pay security for costs
An SRA-regulated solicitor, who had previously told a court that this humble blogger had attacked him outside a court building leaving him "close to death", has deployed further "scandalous allegations" in a signed witness statement, the High Court has been told. Examples of the "baseless assertions and commentary", said to be in a recent witness statement, include a paranoid suggestion that he is being monitored by "large aerials" on vehicles mounted outside his property "clearly used for parabolic eavesdropping of conversations". The judge said he considered "that a good part of the claimants correspondence and evidence is written in a tone which has the effect of causing antagonism and of not always addressing the points made". A link to a link is here - p2pindependentforum.com/post/489207/thread
|
|