|
|
Post by davee39 on Nov 7, 2014 9:33:11 GMT
At the moment its just a white rectangle with no information.
Has FC forgotten it?
Any connection with Friday repayments not being made?
Can FC manage a week without breaking something?
|
|
chrisf
Member of DD Central
Posts: 224 
Likes: 67
|
Post by chrisf on Nov 7, 2014 9:41:56 GMT
Maybe now Pacman faces downwards he has dug himself into the ground?
I noticed first thing this morning the totals and pie chart were there but the my total was wrong, so perhaps it has been taken down for fixing?
|
|
min
Member of DD Central
Posts: 615
Likes: 182
|
Post by min on Nov 7, 2014 9:45:17 GMT
If you look in the recent loan comments the exposure amounts are missing there.
|
|
|
|
Post by goldservice on Nov 7, 2014 9:45:44 GMT
Me too. At 08:00 my total funds were about £50 too low but the Funds summary was present. Now the entire Funds Summary is blank. Also, in Recent Loan Comments, the exposure figures are missing.
|
|
|
|
Post by davee39 on Nov 7, 2014 10:08:07 GMT
Regarding Funds total.
The first stage of the repayment process is to reduce the outstanding balance on each loan making a repayment. This causes the funds total to fall (Zopa works the same way). The final stage is to credit the repayments + interest which causes the total to go up. Usually this has completed by 8am when I first log in. No repayments have been credited so far today. (They were late yesterday as well - finishing after 10 am).
EDIT: Payment run has just started.
|
|
min
Member of DD Central
Posts: 615
Likes: 182
|
Post by min on Nov 7, 2014 10:09:53 GMT
Regarding Funds total. The first stage of the repayment process is to reduce the outstanding balance on each loan making a repayment. This causes the funds total to fall (Zopa works the same way). The final stage is to credit the repayments + interest which causes the total to go up. Usually this has completed by 8am when I first log in. No repayments have been credited so far today. (They were late yesterday as well - finishing after 10 am). They must be doing it now as my available funds is creeping up but still no FC total or accrued interest figures.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,000
Likes: 5,139
|
Post by adrianc on Nov 7, 2014 10:33:32 GMT
Not just me, then...
First thing, my total was down on yesterday. Then it went down a bit more. One part showing as processing (and still is).
Now Pacman's gone into hiding completely, taking the actual figures with him, but the available cash is bobbling about, going up a snidge at a time.
Can somebody feed the hamster?
|
|
fasty
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 388
|
Post by fasty on Nov 7, 2014 10:47:23 GMT
It's all back again for me now
|
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Nov 7, 2014 13:38:53 GMT
See my comments on the other forum. Going to 'my summary' page results in 41 sundry web requests and 1.2MB of data transfers (in firefox, tools, web developer, network,will show the whole mess) and loading the comments and the pie chart is taking 11-15 seconds when it completes at all. The cunning new plan is that the summary page calls an iframe in which javascript calls a 'get lender id' page which returns a JS data object with a lender ID which is then used to call an API-proxy which returns a JS object which contains the numbers (in pence) which is then used to draw the pie chart.... or something like that .. if you haven't got bored and died by then. That's why the summary 'outer' frame comes up OK, but nothing gets filled in for an age (although, for comments, you do get a nice 'loading' msg).
When the website is idle and responsive it is fine; when the website is busy (like it has been since about 11 AM) we get timeouts, 502, 500, 404 errors, and all sorts of problems (the 'sell' page regularly comes up with the iframe where the tab should be showing error 500 instead). The magic word is T-E-S-T-I-N-G, and there seems to be not enough happening.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,000
Likes: 5,139
|
Post by adrianc on Nov 8, 2014 13:10:27 GMT
See my comments on the other forum. Going to 'my summary' page results in 41 sundry web requests and 1.2MB of data transfers Jesus wept. No wonder it's slow... And there's me, out in the sticks, on the end of a "broad"band connection that aspires to 1.5meg on a good day.
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Nov 12, 2014 18:12:44 GMT
See my comments on the other forum. Going to 'my summary' page results in 41 sundry web requests and 1.2MB of data transfers Jesus wept. No wonder it's slow... And there's me, out in the sticks, on the end of a "broad"band connection that aspires to 1.5meg on a good day. Currently overseas, and had there was an issue the last couple of days with the wifi in the place I'm staying. No problem, I thought, I'll just turn on data roaming, as I'll get a whole 50MB worth for just £3 - should be plenty for a couple of evenings on largely text-based sites. God knows how they've managed to get it so bloated, but needless to say, after checking out just a few pages on FC site and a couple of forum threads I suddenly got a message saying I'd used the whole 50MB. That'd have been a huge download back in the day... you'd have thought with any half-sane site design, most of the content on the site would be cached locally on the browser anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Nov 13, 2014 15:30:43 GMT
Ah, I just checked again and they've 'improved it' .. "tools, web developer, network (in FF)" now shows =52= HTTP requests,=2.35= MBytes of data, for one visit to the summary page (including, if Firefox isn't lying, three or more requests for several of the larger .js and typekit pages .. ***, how many times can one page need to ask for the same typekit?! Ah! .. maybe the answer is once per iFrame?) .. Oh and that's after I've already 'HOSTed' out some of the analytics rubbish. Is there a sane web developer out there who can comment?? (I just dabble around the edges).
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Nov 13, 2014 18:20:19 GMT
three or more requests for several of the larger .js and typekit pages Aren't those flagged as cacheable by the browser? Do modern browsers not bother consulting their cache thus avoiding requesting the same resource multiple times? Have FC intentionally prevented them being cached just to suck up as much bandwidth as possible?
|
|
mikeb
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 472
|
Post by mikeb on Nov 13, 2014 18:57:00 GMT
Oh and that's after I've already 'HOSTed' out some of the analytics rubbish. Is there a sane web developer out there who can comment?? (I just dabble around the edges). Can you add any extra to this list ? If so, please share  127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com # FC 127.0.0.1 ssl.google-analytics.com # FC 127.0.0.1 js-agent.newrelic.com # FC 127.0.0.1 beacon-1.newrelic.com # FC 127.0.0.1 asset0.zendesk.com # Stop AWS amazon chunter when using FC 127.0.0.1 cdn.optimizely.com # Funding circle java The zendesk one was because, for some daft reason, my PC was making constant outgoing connections there, which the firewall machine was whinging about all day long. Got fed up of FC's site spamming the logs, so blocked it at the PC.
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Nov 13, 2014 20:46:33 GMT
Must get round to doing that on this (relatively new-ish) PC... Although just in case I end up with something listening on the relevant ports and serving something that looks like a web page, I often use a different address on the loopback network - e.g. 127.0.0.2 or 127.1.2.3 or whatever. There's another one I keep seeing on my android devices - something about honeybadger.io (I forget whether it's www. or js.) - main reason I notice it is that android's browser doesn't recognise the security certificate as being issued by a valid certifying authority, so I need to tell it to ignore an "invalid" certificate every time I visit the site on that device after rebooting it, which doesn't seem like a great idea to train users to do.....
|
|
