Green Energy Investment Account is live

At the moment I am totally baffled and I need to spend this evening going through statements and paperwork. The outstanding £0.27 withdrawal has gone from my GEIA dashboard and my total investment has dropped from £18.27 not to £18.00 but to £16.61 a drop of £1.66. Looking at my GEIA statement there has been no transactions since the transfer out of £1.73 on the 27^th Nov. However looking at my CA Statement I can see a sale of £1.66 worth of Montrose WT but I hold Montrose WT in both my MLIA and GEIA so I am going to see if I can trace which account the sale was made from, but for the moment I will assume it comes from the GEIA. Additionally I have two entries in the CA for Cumbria WT interest repayments so I am assuming the big One is for the MLIA and the small one is for the GEIA and as yet there seems to be no PF Premium clawback

Edit: I have looked through my statements and,

1. I cannot tally the loan id's in the Montrose WT sale with any of my purchase ids in either my GEIA or MLIA accounts, so I have to assume the GEIA total is correct and they were loan units held in the GEIA that were sold purely on the grounds that the GEIA total has dropped by £1.66.
2. I cannot see why the GEIA has sold £1.66 of Montrose rather than £0.27 of GEIA investment it was instructed to sell: none of the GEIA Montrose WT purchases was for £1.66, there cannot be a limit on the shrapnelising of loans as a sale of £6,000 of Hackney BL was shrapnelised down as low as units of £0.13, thus the only possible reason for Montrose WT being chosen was that the GEIA had an out of balance investment in favour of Montrose WT but there is no reason for the sale of the additional £1.39.
3. I cannot reconcile the two Cumbria WT interest payments to the relevant accounts other than by the size of the payments due to a lack of references.
4. As yet I have not worked out if the £0.00 (£0.000477776710495894) Cumbria WT interest payment, which I assume if for the GEIA holding, is pre or post the payment of the PF Premium. 

The big issue I have, and have had since the upgrade is that you cannot base your accounts on assumption and assumption seems to be the only possible to operate with AC given the state of their Statements.

2nd Edit: Since the £0.27 withdrawal was to have resulted in an investment of £18.00 invested in my GEIA, I have increased my investment total from £16.61 to £18.00 resulting in entries transfer entries for £1.39 in both the CA and GEIA statements and the GEIA dashboard shows £1.39 awaiting investment and £16.61 invested.

3rd Edit: Having transferred funds across to the GEIA it promptly invested a chunk in loan #127, minutes after the loan had be updated to show that the loan was in a state of flux: in breach of its LTV covenant, and pending proposals from the borrower and a lender vote.  My personal view on this is that as a rule of thumb if there are sufficient grounds to put an alert at the top of the loan page warning people of material changes in the loan then it aught to be the case that the loan is suspended from new investment by the GEIA where investors have no control over what is bought and sold.

bugs4me:  I don't think so. 

As I suggested earlier, even if there was £1M invested in GEIAs tomorrow, the 2.5% differential interest rate 'spread' would produce only £25k/year.  So it would take two full years to generate the £50k needed to replace AC's seed money.

The capital drop was a mistake by the admin team when editing the figures of the capital remaining in the loan.  This should either have been corrected already or will be corrected shortly.

With the GEIA interest payments should have been deducted at source but that hasn't happened in this case.  I've made a change that will make sure that this happens next time regardless of how the payment is processed internally, so in future you will see a single transaction at the capped rate with no second transaction for the provision fund.  In this instance we'll waive the provision fund payment as our mistake, topping up the fund ourselves.

£0.08 of interest? Maybe in individual payments of less than a penny that show on the statement as £0.00?

We're not making any corrections that involve movements of money.  We cannot change your cash position without making statement entries.  What can happen is your loan units can be revalued without a movement of funds, and that is what happened accidentally with Falmouth through admin error.  That particular function is being taken away from the admins so that they cannot do so by mistake in future.

Although a different context, that quite clearly isn't true - my cash account suddenly jumped today by a significant amount, without any statement entries having been generated.

My "Settled bids" also fell by the same amount at the same time, and I'd had an email yesterday about the loan in question, making it obvious what had happened despite the lack of any statement entry.

Presumably AC don't consider it worth bothering to generate statement entries for money being returned from settled bids on the grounds that this function won't be relevant in the future, but it clearly demonstrates that mechanisms exist for AC to change our cash position without making statement entries.