I dont understand how growth street can pay out bonuses when they cant even ensure all their account holders will get their money back.
I suppose the legal advice is that the bonus was contractual with no risk warning attached, whereas capital was always said to be at risk. Doesn't seem fair but they would have to follow the law.
All my posts are my personal opinion and are not advice. History suggests that, if anything, it would be more profitable to do the opposite of whatever I do, but whatever you do will not be any responsibility of mine.