|
Post by bernythedolt on Oct 20, 2020 15:16:05 GMT
On the face of it, £500 does sound like small fry when set against the hundreds of £millions every month we've been forking out to belong to the EU. Hopefully when those contributions eventually cease, we can divert some towards the cost of customs declarations? Of course the cost for an individual business sounds like small fry compared to the total amount payed by the whole country... how can you even make such a comparison? The total cost of the additional red tape is very likely to exceed the EU membership fee. More Project Fear. Subsequently reigned in to half the previous scaremongery figure.
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,618
Likes: 6,432
|
Post by registerme on Oct 20, 2020 15:32:06 GMT
I'm guilt of this myself so I'm a big hypocrite But... Another Brexit thread descending down the same old route. The divisions are so deep that truth and facts are immaterial to the debate. I can't see these divisions healing for a generation. It feels much worse than the depths Trump has plunged the US into because he'll go in a few months or 4 years and stuff like SCOTUS can be reformed. Edit: *sigh* Me too, and there was always the danger of it, but the reason I posted the OP was because it was interesting, relevant and from a subject matter expert (compare and contrast with Mr "I didn't realise Dover was important" Raab) in the particular domain of trade, customs and logistics - I'd not seen that before.
|
|
|
Post by dan1 on Oct 20, 2020 15:42:34 GMT
I'm guilt of this myself so I'm a big hypocrite But... Another Brexit thread descending down the same old route. The divisions are so deep that truth and facts are immaterial to the debate. I can't see these divisions healing for a generation. It feels much worse than the depths Trump has plunged the US into because he'll go in a few months or 4 years and stuff like SCOTUS can be reformed. Edit: *sigh* Me too, and there was always the danger of it, but the reason I posted the OP was because it was interesting, relevant and from a subject matter expert (compare and contrast with Mr "I didn't realise Dover was important" Raab) in the particular domain of trade, customs and logistics - I'd not seen that before. It's an interesting perspective and was well worth posting. I wasn't having a pop at anyone, least of all you. I guess my feelings shift from wanting to vent anger, to ridicule, to sadness. There are too few winners from where I stand.
|
|
r00lish67
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 4,048
|
Post by r00lish67 on Oct 20, 2020 16:01:32 GMT
I'm guilt of this myself so I'm a big hypocrite But... Another Brexit thread descending down the same old route. The divisions are so deep that truth and facts are immaterial to the debate. I can't see these divisions healing for a generation. It feels much worse than the depths Trump has plunged the US into because he'll go in a few months or 4 years and stuff like SCOTUS can be reformed. Edit: *sigh* Oh I don't know.... Four years ago we were bickering about 'is this going to be a good or bad thing'. Two years ago, we were bickering about whether it really had to be done at all. Now, having established it's at best a bit of a waste of our country's time and with democracy's intent fulfilled, we're now speculating on just how big the socio-economic bill is and will be. Progress, see! Re: truth/facts, facts of importance to me off the top of my head: As of next year I am going to have count up my Schengen days carefully around my home continent in order to not break the law. I am no longer going to be eligible for an EHIC. My currency is worth 10-15% less globally than it used to be. Instead of being asked about Manchester United when I meet a new person abroad, they wince and ask about Brexit. Back home, I look at things that don't (yet) impact me directly but that are important and have been neglected of time and money e.g. The social care bill, inequality, NHS improvements. I'm obviously not expecting a chorus of violins here for my travel-related inconvenience. I'm still a very privileged first-world person. Yet, I would much prefer it if there was at least a long list of countervailing benefits that others are going to be experiencing to balance things out. I'm yet to hear them though. edit: X'd with Dan. Well, you've put my waffle in 3 words: "too few winners" edit2: I warn you all, I've opened a 330ml tin of Greek supermarket own-brand 3.8% lager now. things could get messy, I best bow out.
|
|
|
Post by bernythedolt on Oct 20, 2020 16:09:38 GMT
At present we face a scorned EU intent on punishing us for having the temerity to leave. If nothing else, to serve as a deterrent to others.
So how much of these red tape costs, etc, are real and ongoing, as opposed to temporary blips?
This too shall pass?
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 5,131
Member is Online
|
Post by adrianc on Oct 20, 2020 17:12:51 GMT
At present we face a scorned EU intent on punishing us for having the temerity to leave. No, we don't. The EU have acted absolutely consistently and openly through all of this. They have said "This is where we stand. You know how we work, and you know we will not change the way our internal market works for your benefit - so pick where on that scale you want your relationship to be."We face a world who stare at us, and wonder how we can be so short-sighted and so disingenuous... while wondering whether we can be trusted to stand by our word and obligations. The WTO basis for trade is ongoing until such time as we grow up and negotiate a proper deal in good faith. We may get the logistics bottlenecks sorted out before then - they are entirely down to UK lack of preparedness and incompetence, after all.
|
|
mrk
Posts: 807
Likes: 753
|
Post by mrk on Oct 20, 2020 17:40:15 GMT
Of course the cost for an individual business sounds like small fry compared to the total amount payed by the whole country... how can you even make such a comparison? The total cost of the additional red tape is very likely to exceed the EU membership fee. More Project Fear. Subsequently reigned in to half the previous scaremongery figure. Both articles are based on this impact assessment published by HMRC. The £15bn figure (first article) can be found in that document: HMRC therefore estimates that the static total ongoing administrative burden on UK-EU trade is £15 billion (updated to reflect 2017 data) a year. The £7bn figure (second article) can also be found there: The latest static estimate for the annual administrative burden on UK businesses from additional import and export declarations is £7.5 billion (updated to reflect 2017 data)So it wasn't "reigned in", they're just two different figures referring to slightly different things. The smaller one for UK businesses only and the larger one is for both UK and EU businesses. "Project fear" = I can't be bothered to read and understand the numbers.
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S.
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 2,974
Member is Online
|
Post by michaelc on Oct 20, 2020 20:56:23 GMT
Two points to make:
1/ It looks like we have 5 or 6 posteres here on one side of the debate and just one poster on the other. If this was a playground and we were kids I'd say he's on the verge of being bullied.
2/ Why would it make any sense for the EU to be as friendly and reasonable as possible to any of its members leaving the club? It doesn't want to reduce in size and certainly doesn't want to lose its larger members so why would it be keen to show that the route out of the EU is easy or frictionless to use the jargon ?
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,618
Likes: 6,432
|
Post by registerme on Oct 20, 2020 21:31:40 GMT
michaelc you may be right about point 1, and if so I certainly don't want to see any bullying, let alone be a part of it. But the question remains, what has this government, that gained power largely through it's staunch support of Brexit, done to minimise and mitigate any logistics / transport / customs risks associated with Brexit? I've yet to see an actual answer. I don't care who the answer comes from - ardent Brexiteer, depressed Remainer, Tory, Labour, Lib Dem, in power, out of it, scientist, somebody in business etc etc etc etc. I just want somebody to point at something and say "look, this is what we've done, and we know it is going to work". And then to be able to nod my head in approval and think "great, you've got that covered".
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 5,131
Member is Online
|
Post by adrianc on Oct 20, 2020 21:38:02 GMT
Two points to make: 1/ It looks like we have 5 or 6 posteres here on one side of the debate and just one poster on the other. If this was a playground and we were kids I'd say he's on the verge of being bullied. Look back to the 2016 brexit threads. This place was overwhelmingly pro-brexit... Is the fact that there's only one person still willing to support the godawful mess a sign of dawning reality?
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,986
Likes: 5,131
Member is Online
|
Post by adrianc on Oct 20, 2020 21:44:23 GMT
The EU have acted absolutely consistently and openly through all of this. They have said "This is where we stand. You know how we work, and you know we will not change the way our internal market works for your benefit - so pick where on that scale you want your relationship to be."And, to demonstrate that, this is taken from a 2017 "Roadmap to Brexit" European Commission doc... The Canadian deal took 7yrs to negotiate and, 3yrs after it was agreed, it hasn't yet been ratified by all 27 EU member states. And it explicitly includes convergence with EU rules... Oh, and the UK apparently never even asked for anything along those lines anyway. But did repeatedly ask for far more than a straightforward trade deal would ever include. yorkshirebylines.co.uk/britain-never-asked-for-a-canada-style-free-trade-agreement/It's almost like the government and brexiteer media have been lying to the public...
|
|
mrk
Posts: 807
Likes: 753
|
Post by mrk on Oct 20, 2020 21:50:48 GMT
But the question remains, what has this government, that gained power largely through it's staunch support of Brexit, done to minimise and mitigate any logistics / transport / customs risks associated with Brexit? Well, there's a new website warning that time is running out. And the PM had a call with businesses today. Mr Johnson told businesses on the call on Tuesday afternoon: “It is vital that everybody on this call takes seriously the need to get ready, because whatever happens . . . change is going to happen.”... Carolyn Fairbairn, director-general of the CBI, said businesses were “finding it really difficult to prepare because they don’t know what for”.
Edit: and for those who don't like the FT here's The Telegraph: Brexit is like moving house' Gove tells business in 'disastrous' conference callAnother source said: "It felt like an exercise so the Government can say it has formally talked to business. The Prime Minister does not have a grasp of detail and that’s what Brexit is about. "It feels like only in the past few weeks they have realised this and it’s incredibly scary, especially as we don't have a lot of time.”
|
|
|
Post by bernythedolt on Oct 20, 2020 23:06:46 GMT
Both articles are based on this impact assessment published by HMRC. The £15bn figure (first article) can be found in that document: HMRC therefore estimates that the static total ongoing administrative burden on UK-EU trade is £15 billion (updated to reflect 2017 data) a year. The £7bn figure (second article) can also be found there: The latest static estimate for the annual administrative burden on UK businesses from additional import and export declarations is £7.5 billion (updated to reflect 2017 data)So it wasn't "reigned in", they're just two different figures referring to slightly different things. The smaller one for UK businesses only and the larger one is for both UK and EU businesses. "Project fear" = I can't be bothered to read and understand the numbers. I understand numbers reasonably well. The £15bn is the combined cost estimate for both the UK and EU (at least until the inevitable easements come into play). Of which £7.5bn is the estimate for the UK's costs. Half the total. Even I can follow that. So why compare this total 'EU-plus-UK' cost against the UK's membership saving, as you have? "The total cost of the additional red tape is very likely to exceed the EU membership fee" may well be true but so what? The FT later reigning back to half the figure (the UK's costs) makes more sense as a metric worth considering. The £15bn belongs in the scaremongering bucket.
|
|
|
Post by bernythedolt on Oct 20, 2020 23:42:11 GMT
Two points to make: 1/ It looks like we have 5 or 6 posteres here on one side of the debate and just one poster on the other. If this was a playground and we were kids I'd say he's on the verge of being bullied. 2/ Why would it make any sense for the EU to be as friendly and reasonable as possible to any of its members leaving the club? It doesn't want to reduce in size and certainly doesn't want to lose its larger members so why would it be keen to show that the route out of the EU is easy or frictionless to use the jargon ? Thanks, but no worries on my account. One or two do enjoy their brusque (if not sometimes outright rude) commenting style, but it's water off a duck's back, and most posters here do manage to keep it civil. Perhaps surprisingly, I don't have particularly strong leanings one way or the other*, have always seen arguments for both, and I very much appreciate the factual posts, such as adrianc 's outlining the proportionate national spend vs. EU membership cost, for example. It's unfortunate that very little of this factual, rational debate entered the mainstream media back in 2016, so that people were fully and properly informed. I remember hunting around at the time and it was difficult to sort the good from the scaremongering. That's why I like to challenge scaremongering now, if I think I detect it. *I didn't even get a vote in the referendum! Mrs Dolt & I moved house in March 2016 and lost our votes because our new local authority was remiss with their paperwork. When I see the debate still raging, I'm sometimes grateful we were enforced fence-sitters...
|
|
Greenwood2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 2,780
|
Post by Greenwood2 on Oct 21, 2020 7:07:02 GMT
Two points to make: 1/ It looks like we have 5 or 6 posteres here on one side of the debate and just one poster on the other. If this was a playground and we were kids I'd say he's on the verge of being bullied. Look back to the 2016 brexit threads. This place was overwhelmingly pro-brexit... Is the fact that there's only one person still willing to support the godawful mess a sign of dawning reality? Most people have just given up bothering posting on this, no one is going to change their minds from their entrenched positions on either side.
|
|