michaelc
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S.
Posts: 5,706
Likes: 2,981
Member is Online
|
Post by michaelc on Dec 19, 2021 15:34:20 GMT
Yes a very relevant thread IMO. What to do when you have a sudden influx of cash? A trip to the gold shop might be one way but then you overly expose yourself to all sorts of other forces.
Oh of course, I know, silly me. You donate it to the directors and administrators of the next failed p2p project.
|
|
keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 2,623
|
Post by keitha on Dec 19, 2021 16:21:04 GMT
AS I remember from the early 60s until 2008 mortgage rates traditionally ran at about 8% there were of course blips along the way. for me the big issue is the millennials with mortgages at 1 or 2 percent and a loan of £500000, at 1 percent they are paying £5K a year in interest at 2% £10K , if it goes back to say 6% how many will be able to afford £30K a year to pay interest plus £20k in repayments. It would of course also badly affect the BTL Market. I have a friend in London who has a portfolio of 15 properties that makes him a comfortable income after tax, mortgage payments etc, he only owns his own and one other outright the others are heavily mortgaged, if his mortgages per property go by even 2% he would be losing money. But then back in 81 I borrowed £19,000, on an 8K salary and was told I'd be bankrupt within 2 years by borrowing more than twice my income.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2021 17:45:49 GMT
"Inflation is vital if any economy is to grow"
I'm not convinced that the economy needs to grow
I don't believe that inflation triggers economy growth
I don't see either hypotheses to be proven
"quasi independant" well everything in the world is connected, but no I think your perception is wrong
|
|
tallsuk
Member of DD Central
Posts: 143
Likes: 128
|
Post by tallsuk on Dec 19, 2021 22:45:06 GMT
keitha, that is exactly what I am worried about as well. It is not just millennials but also many people who have remortgaged to buy properties that were overpriced because the of an overheated property market driven by low interest rates. BTL mortgages are stressed tested against higher rates but a 2% rise in interest rates could make life a lot harder for a lot of people who at best will be forced to significantly reduce their spending. That is likely to have a knock on effect to the wider economy.
However, it very much depends on which side you take. Correctly me if I am wrong, but if you first bought in ’81, was that not in the middle of a housing crash? I am not surprised people were telling you were mad; it is the perfect example of contrarian purchasing that Warren Buffet like to talk about. I am guessing you did quite well by buying at the bottom of the market.
I think a lot of millennials that have been sensible and saved for the last few years could also benefit from a fall in house prices. They are struggling to raise a deposit that will allow them to get a 4.5x salary mortgage but that could well change if rates keep on going this way. Going to be interesting.
|
|
foolsgold
Member of DD Central
Posts: 159
Likes: 194
|
Post by foolsgold on Dec 20, 2021 0:04:21 GMT
The way I see it is that inflation is here to stay for the medium term at least.It suits the government to have inflation as how else are they going to reduce the REAL value of the money they have borrowed and printed other than to devalue the debt.
If you borrow £100 and inflation is 10 percent a year (unlikely I know) then your debt will be £90 in year one £81 in year 2...£73 in year 3 and so it goes.So government debt is reduced as well.A sensible thing to do is to borow at at a fixed rate and buy property to rent out and gain a yield that covers your interest rate and property prices always go up in the long run and your mortage debt on a 5 year fixed price shall be reduced in real tems come year 5....property should go up long term.
The government is going startwhat is called financial repression where inflation exceeds yearly salary incomes so the working man has less real income to spend and he gets poorer long term whilst debt is reduced.Thats how theypaid the debt from WWW 2
Debt is good as long as its good debt that puts money in your pocket.Shares are a bit of a mixed bag but propety should do ok. Cask is bad in inflationary times...just my thoughts
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2021 9:35:42 GMT
You could work out what would need to happen to make property a less good deal. I guess the making the holding of residential property in a company would drop the price pretty fast. Similarly limit numbers of properties ownable by individuals or by foreign individuals. I don't think anyone is going to go for that sort of legislation so Property is a good bet.
|
|
tallsuk
Member of DD Central
Posts: 143
Likes: 128
|
Post by tallsuk on Dec 20, 2021 10:31:23 GMT
You could work out what would need to happen to make property a less good deal. I guess the making the holding of residential property in a company would drop the price pretty fast. Similarly limit numbers of properties ownable by individuals or by foreign individuals. I don't think anyone is going to go for that sort of legislation so Property is a good bet. I am not sure on the most recent figures but until recently the slit between professional landlords with a portfolio in a ltd co and small or accidental landlords who held 1 or 2 properties in their own name was about 50/50. The government came down on the side of the professionals and has been introducing legislation that targets small landlords. This was supposed to free up a lot of housing stock as buy to let became far harder to do on the side. The pros and cons of having a rental market run by professional companies is a different debate. Foreign investors are there because the market is so hot. They will disappear if the market drops. The property market is not driven by the supply and demand of housing stock, it is driven by the supply and demand of credit. If people can add an extra 10k on to their mortgage they spend it. It is also the reason that interest rates are so effetive at controlling inflation. Put the cost of housing up and people stop spending money.
|
|
tallsuk
Member of DD Central
Posts: 143
Likes: 128
|
Post by tallsuk on Dec 20, 2021 10:44:00 GMT
The way I see it is that inflation is here to stay for the medium term at least.It suits the government to have inflation as how else are they going to reduce the REAL value of the money they have borrowed and printed other than to devalue the debt.
If you borrow £100 and inflation is 10 percent a year (unlikely I know) then your debt will be £90 in year one £81 in year 2...£73 in year 3 and so it goes.So government debt is reduced as well.A sensible thing to do is to borow at at a fixed rate and buy property to rent out and gain a yield that covers your interest rate and property prices always go up in the long run and your mortage debt on a 5 year fixed price shall be reduced in real tems come year 5....property should go up long term.
The government is going startwhat is called financial repression where inflation exceeds yearly salary incomes so the working man has less real income to spend and he gets poorer long term whilst debt is reduced.Thats how theypaid the debt from WWW 2
Debt is good as long as its good debt that puts money in your pocket.Shares are a bit of a mixed bag but propety should do ok. Cask is bad in inflationary times...just my thoughts
I agree about the way the goverment uses financial repression to take money off taxpayers but devaluation of debt doesnt work at that level because the lenders are the major financial institutions that just ramp up the price the government has to pay to borrow. I agree about cash but it is bad at all times, just worse with inflation and shares. Debt is as good as the security which in a rocky market is harder to calculate.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2021 10:56:20 GMT
devaluation of debt doesnt work at that level because the lenders are the major financial institutions that just ramp up the price the government has to pay to borrow. At which point the central banks step in to hoover it all up and keep bond yields suppressed...
|
|
keitha
Member of DD Central
2024, hopefully the year I get out of P2P
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 2,623
|
Post by keitha on Dec 20, 2021 11:17:11 GMT
keitha, that is exactly what I am worried about as well. It is not just millennials but also many people who have remortgaged to buy properties that were overpriced because the of an overheated property market driven by low interest rates. BTL mortgages are stressed tested against higher rates but a 2% rise in interest rates could make life a lot harder for a lot of people who at best will be forced to significantly reduce their spending. That is likely to have a knock on effect to the wider economy. However, it very much depends on which side you take. Correctly me if I am wrong, but if you first bought in ’81, was that not in the middle of a housing crash? I am not surprised people were telling you were mad; it is the perfect example of contrarian purchasing that Warren Buffet like to talk about. I am guessing you did quite well by buying at the bottom of the market. I think a lot of millennials that have been sensible and saved for the last few years could also benefit from a fall in house prices. They are struggling to raise a deposit that will allow them to get a 4.5x salary mortgage but that could well change if rates keep on going this way. Going to be interesting. tallsukIn my case people thought 2.5 times income was high, but I remember 2 years later a colleague borrowing £2.5K to refurbish his Kitchen that was the same amount he had outstanding on his Mortgage. In my case the property sold 10 years later for 3 times what I paid, and I've seen property on the same street selling now for 12-15 times what I paid. I honestly believe property prices are getting ridiculous. In Late 2017 I purchased this property for £61,000, I've spent a little over £14,000 on a new boiler, New front door, creating an upstairs bathroom, and solar panels the latest online valuation is £105,000 not taking the improvements into account. A similar property sold for£108,000 recently and it was a 2 bed 1 bathroom, rather than 2 bed 2 bathroom. What galls me is the rental prices here, a properties like mine are renting for over £500 a month, I could buy at under £400 a month
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,014
Likes: 5,142
|
Post by adrianc on Dec 20, 2021 11:35:01 GMT
What galls me is the rental prices here, a properties like mine are renting for over £500 a month, I could buy at under £400 a month It's not quite that simple... Yes, you could say £500 x 12mo = £6k/yr rent = 5.5% raw yield... But that ignores all the other costs. Maintenance. Insurance. You're in Wales, so compulsory licencing. EICRs and GSCs. Then the tenant gives notice, so you've got a void, followed by tenant-finding and -referencing costs. And that assumes there's no bad debts or un-reclaimable damage. And that's a freehold house, so no service charge or ground rent. If the landlord's got any kind of non-trivial BtL mortgage on it (lower max LtV, higher interest than residential), then it's damn near odds on that they're not making any post-tax profit on the rental, just betting on capital growth. And, of course, if they were purchasing now, then there's higher rate SDLT - +4% LTT in Wales. No, residential BtL is not a licence to print money...
|
|
tallsuk
Member of DD Central
Posts: 143
Likes: 128
|
Post by tallsuk on Dec 20, 2021 11:50:59 GMT
keithaI completely agree with you about the property market at the moment. It is clearly running out of control. I live in the SE so a 1 bed in a reasonable area on the outskirts of London is still £300-400k. However, comparing a monthly mortgage repayment to a rent cheque is not a true comparison. In addition to the maintence of a property there is alo the cost of debt, the interest the homeowner has to pay on top of repaying borrowed capital as well as the cost of equity, having cash tied up in the property that can be reinvested for profit elsewhere. Renting and buying tend to cost people similar amounts. The capital gains from homeownership tend to match the returns that could be made investing the capital in the financial markets. Individuals should make the decision on other factors. Many people want a place to call their own home, whilst others enjoy the freedom that renting offers. Buy to let can be a profitable business but the changes in legislation mean that they have to be sensible and take a professional approach. The margins now mean that just buying somewhere as an investment does not work anymore although it may take a real crash to shake out many of the accidental landlords who are still not aware of the changes.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2021 14:54:06 GMT
I wouldn't want my positive views about property above to be in anyway an endorsement of buy to let or buy for capital gain. I doubt if many individuals have the skills in the property market to beat S&S investing, but that is just my opinion.
|
|
michaelc
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S.
Posts: 5,706
Likes: 2,981
Member is Online
|
Post by michaelc on Dec 20, 2021 15:03:21 GMT
What galls me is the rental prices here, a properties like mine are renting for over £500 a month, I could buy at under £400 a month It's not quite that simple... Yes, you could say £500 x 12mo = £6k/yr rent = 5.5% raw yield... But that ignores all the other costs. Maintenance. Insurance. You're in Wales, so compulsory licencing. EICRs and GSCs. Then the tenant gives notice, so you've got a void, followed by tenant-finding and -referencing costs. And that assumes there's no bad debts or un-reclaimable damage. And that's a freehold house, so no service charge or ground rent. If the landlord's got any kind of non-trivial BtL mortgage on it (lower max LtV, higher interest than residential), then it's damn near odds on that they're not making any post-tax profit on the rental, just betting on capital growth. And, of course, if they were purchasing now, then there's higher rate SDLT - +4% LTT in Wales. No, residential BtL is not a licence to print money...Agree with that which is part of the reason I'll not be renting out our family home whilst I'm away for a few years. Seems to make more sense to sell and immediately buy 1 smaller property in the UK for rental and more abroad where the yields are higher.
|
|
foolsgold
Member of DD Central
Posts: 159
Likes: 194
|
Post by foolsgold on Dec 20, 2021 17:34:03 GMT
OP was about interest rates and inflation.
I see property as a hedge against inflation and I think inflation is going to have a negative effect on standard of living costs.Its the matter about being ahead of the curve on this.Cash on account is a bad choice.Good debt is a better choice in an inflationary environment.
Im what they call a portfolio landlord.For example I bought a property 6 years ago and it has doubled in value as have many of them.Ive taken a return on investment exceeding the rate of inflation and Im currently taking the equity out of it to buy another property and this will fund the deposit.The new property will rent out for an after tax profit exceeding £400 a month plus I hope to have an increase in the value of the new property over the next 5 years of which I will have a fixed rate mortage so my risk is reduced.
I might see an increase in the value maybe not but its in a good area and will always rent and give me a monthly profit that I wouldnt otherwise have had .I could of course stick the released equity into shares or leave it at 0.5 percent .Bearing in mind the threat of inflation I dont think that would be a good choice.Where as the borrowed mortage money in real terms would be lower than the real value in 5 years time
I see financial repression coming and its how to be ahead of the curve.
|
|