drum
Posts: 17
Likes: 4
|
Post by drum on Feb 18, 2015 15:43:22 GMT
Yes that does make sense, but it should be clearly explained on the site.
|
|
|
Post by westonkevRS on Feb 18, 2015 17:12:13 GMT
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on Feb 19, 2015 13:33:11 GMT
TSB. 5% on balances up to £2000. They have probably changed the rules by now, but some people (financial experts like wot I is) used to be able to open two accounts, two more for the spouse, and (with a bit of whinging in person at the local branch) two joint accounts, ending up with £12000 making 5%, and as instant access as you can get. (Anybody else collecting debit cards?). Usual putting money on the inter-account carousel rules applied. Alas, from January 31st 2015 it's been 1 account per person maximum and you have to fund every account with £500 from a non-TSB account each month. I use the TSB current account; best used alongside another (Nationwide offer 5% on 2.5k for a year currently); I have a halifax account to pocket hte fiver a month and leave as little in there as possible. As I'm a lower rate payer £1500 in halifax getting tax free £5 a month is equivalent to 5% so i try to keep it under that. I chuck the rest in P2P/the big scary market
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Feb 19, 2015 22:37:49 GMT
As I'm a lower rate payer £1500 in halifax getting tax free £5 a month is equivalent to 5% so i try to keep it under that. AFAIK, the £5/month from the Halifax isn't tax-free, but it is net of basic rate tax. So it is considered to be £6.25 gross less £1.25 tax. I don't know whether non-taxpayers could complete a R85 and receive the full £6.25/month but, if not, they ought to be able to claim the tax back from HMRC.
|
|
mg
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by mg on May 18, 2015 12:17:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by betterthanworking on May 18, 2015 18:26:17 GMT
I have a moderate toe in the water with Fruitful.
My findings/impressions are:
1. Signups are controlled by a waiting list for investors; you need to apply for an invitation. I waited for about two weeks I think. 2. Admin and communications are very good. I had enquiries and a problem (my own fault) dealt with swiftly and efficiently. 3. Ultra simple product offering for investors, and streamlined graphically-clean website. 4. As mentioned by drum previously, care is required over the interest payment conditions. I made detailed enquiries about this, and was answered by their Chief Technical Officer. It seems that one's investment is assigned to specific loans (I get the impression this is a small number of loans,) and notional interest is only assigned to the investor's balance on the day of the month that the loan payment is due. My concern is that if I pay in several deposits on different days of the month, then withdraw some funds, I would want to choose those pounds that do not carry much accrued interest as opposed to those that might have say, almost a months accrued interest. The CTO said they had plans for "…tools to give better visibility of when your interest payments are due/and from what borrower". 5. There is protection from a 'canopy fund'.
For me, my initial impression that this offering was suitable as a short-term home for funds has been corrected, and I am now happy to cautiously use it for limited-scale medium-term investment. In terms of rates and flexibility, it is certainly more attractive than Wellesley for example, though my gut reaction says there is more risk.
|
|
webwiz
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 210
|
Post by webwiz on May 29, 2015 17:08:52 GMT
I am still totally confused about the amount and timing of interest payments, and their link to individual loans. Can you elucidate?
|
|
|
Post by betterthanworking on May 29, 2015 17:35:19 GMT
Hi webwiz. Hmm, yes. Reading back over that last post, I've not been very clear, have I. To be honest, I'm not absolutely sure on this, but as I see it, interest is added one month after monies are deposited. If you withdraw the money before that date, you get no interest. Simple enough so far. But what happens if you pay in a second amount half way through the month, then make a withdrawal. Which batch of money does the withdrawal come from? The answer I got from the company was that oldest money is withdrawn first. Anyway, this is less of an issue if you are investing for medium term.
|
|
Steerpike
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1,687
|
Post by Steerpike on Oct 27, 2015 15:20:55 GMT
Fruitful have found their foray in to the P2P market fruitless.
Once our ambitions collided with reality, we found that people lending their money wanted high-yielding (above market interest rates) and short term investments (easy access).
From our data, we could see that the frequency of customers investing their money and withdrawing would make it difficult for Fruitful to scale. And, ultimately, this type of investing wasn’t a good fit for the long-term loans people were investing in.
To that end, we’ve made the (tough) decision to move away from accepting contributions from retail investors until we can offer products that fit this style of investing.
|
|
ribs
Probably not James Marshall
Posts: 148
Likes: 151
|
Post by ribs on Oct 28, 2015 11:49:32 GMT
Fruitful have found their foray in to the P2P market fruitless. On a more serious note... I did sign up for a fruitful account. I loved the website, the language used, everything about it... but I didn't give them a penny of my money, purely because to get my money out of my account, there needed to be other borrowers kicking around to purchase my shares in the mortgages. All of this is hidden to the user, so for all I know, fruitful is running at it's maximum capacity, and there isn't any spare money 'kicking about' to buy my loan parts when I want to cash out. I'd never know. A lot can change in the 10+ years I'm planning on parking my money there... Sure, fruitful could fill the gap, but how sustainable is that? The whole business model relies on there being fresh cash available all the time. But without that extra money around, it could all come crashing down on itself, and I'd never know better until it was too late. With products like ratesetter, funding circle etc. there is an 'end in sight' to the loans I've put money into, and usually an option of getting my money out sooner if I'm willing to take a hit on the interest. Unless I'm missing something here (perfectly possible), it seemed to me that fruitful would have some crashing down eventually without a constant influx of new cash.
|
|
|
Post by westonkevRS on Oct 30, 2015 19:09:30 GMT
ribs , I think you are certainly correct to identify liquidity risk as a concern. But also by their own admission there is clearly a mismatch between AER expectations of individual consumer lenders (and probably most institutions as well) and the APR expected for consumer mortgages. Mortgage lending is currently only feasible in the more expensive property development markets. Kevin.
|
|