mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 3, 2016 1:05:03 GMT
Almost £2.5m of further funds still needed to fill the 8 loans currently available, yet more new loans still being launched (another £245k lined up for this afternoon). Hard to see how the likes of the Rishton renewal loan will ever fill at this rate (£750k still to go ...) Well it has disappeared from "Loans Needing Investment" but the loan details still show "Loan being renewed" duck: You may have missed the update added on 23/Sep...
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,885
Likes: 6,990
|
Post by duck on Oct 3, 2016 3:42:17 GMT
duck : You may have missed the update added on 23/Sep... I remember the update but was just noting that the original loan still says that it is being 'renewed' so a disconnect in the information being presented.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 3, 2016 12:20:22 GMT
We will be posting a new soon, 3rd October, at 3pm This is a supplemental loan, secured by a first legal charge on a development in Northern Ireland valued at £3,093,000 Loan Amount: £200,000, part of an overall loan of £1,102,000 fundingsecure: There seems to be an inconsistency between the above and the page linked from the announcement, which states that "FundingSecure already have three loans outstanding on these properties - ref 2693448989 1888317487 8454072999. totalling £1,102.000". That suggests the above quote is not correct, and that today's loan is in addition to, rather than part of, the £1.1M loan. Am I interpreting this correctly?
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 3, 2016 14:58:09 GMT
We will be posting a new soon, 3rd October, at 3pm This is a supplemental loan, secured by a first legal charge on a development in Northern Ireland valued at £3,093,000 Loan Amount: £200,000, part of an overall loan of £1,102,000 fundingsecure: Did I blink and miss the release of this loan? I don't see it on the list of loans coming soon, or the list of available loans, or the list of loans awaiting activation, or the list of active loans.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 3, 2016 16:24:19 GMT
We will be posting a new soon, 3rd October, at 3pm This is a supplemental loan, secured by a first legal charge on a development in Northern Ireland valued at £3,093,000 Loan Amount: £200,000, part of an overall loan of £1,102,000 fundingsecure : There seems to be an inconsistency between the above and the page linked from the announcement, which states that "FundingSecure already have three loans outstanding on these properties - ref 2693448989 1888317487 8454072999. totalling £1,102.000". That suggests the above quote is not correct, and that today's loan is in addition to, rather than part of, the £1.1M loan. Am I interpreting this correctly? fundingsecure: This loan has now appeared on the website, so you can ignore my last question, but the question before that (quoted above) still is outstanding. Furthermore, the middle loan of the three described as being outstanding, #1888317487, shows on the website as having ended on 31/Jul/16, so something's wrong there as well. Finally, the description of the loan includes "As properties are sold a proportion of each sale will be transferred to FundingSecure client account - to be used to pay down the loan." Can you please explain how this will work considering all the various priorities of the outstanding loans? I.e. Will the first priority loans be repaid first? Or the lowest priority loans? Or will any repayment be spread among all the outstanding loans? If the latter, how will the repayments be spread?
|
|
|
Post by fundingsecure on Oct 4, 2016 7:34:05 GMT
Mikes - thanks for highlighting the error - that loan had been renewed - now corrected.
Regarding how the pay down works - please check loan ID 8454072999 which was reduced, when renewing, by funds received. The borrower elected to pay down this specific loan, with the overall value increasing significantly, resulting in a lower LTV for all loans.
FundingSecure
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 18, 2016 19:31:57 GMT
We will be posting a new loan today, 18th October, at 3pm This is a loan secured by a first legal charge on a property in Durham. Loan Amount: £32,000 fundingsecure: Can you please take a bit more care when sending out new loan emails? I received an email at 1342 this afternoon, with the subject "New Loan being posted tomorrow". I thought "No hurry reading that. I'll look at it later." When I opened it a little while ago, however, I found that the email subject was wrong and the loan had, in fact, been posted little more than an hour after the email was sent. It was fully funded by the time I opened the email, so I had missed out on the opportunity to invest.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 19, 2016 1:38:14 GMT
fundingsecure: Can you please clarify the state of the restoration/refurbishment of the replica boat? The description for the renewal that was listed on Tuesday appears to be identical to the description that was given six months ago. And that, in turn, appears to be identical to the description that was given eight months before that. To my untrained eye, the photos that are described as showing the boat "in its current condition" in Aug.'15, Apr.'16 and Oct.'16 all look identical. I am therefore getting the impression that no progress has been made towards the refurbishment. Is that the case? If not, can you please indicate what progress has been made and what impact this might have on the value of the security?
|
|
stub8535
Member of DD Central
personal opinions only. Not qualified to advise on investment products.
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 945
|
Post by stub8535 on Oct 21, 2016 10:16:14 GMT
fundingsecure : Can you please clarify the state of the restoration/refurbishment of the replica boat? The description for the renewal that was listed on Tuesday appears to be identical to the description that was given six months ago. And that, in turn, appears to be identical to the description that was given eight months before that. To my untrained eye, the photos that are described as showing the boat "in its current condition" in Aug.'15, Apr.'16 and Oct.'16 all look identical. I am therefore getting the impression that no progress has been made towards the refurbishment. Is that the case? If not, can you please indicate what progress has been made and what impact this might have on the value of the security? New pix just added.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Oct 21, 2016 17:19:28 GMT
fundingsecure : Can you please clarify the state of the restoration/refurbishment of the replica boat? New pix just added. fundingsecure: Thank you.
|
|
n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 882
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Nov 8, 2016 16:49:34 GMT
There is a 10K 'trains and memorabilia' loan at 13% with no bid limit which mysteriously appeard this afternoon, at least I am pretty sure I never had an email.
|
|
Neil_P2PBlog
P2P Blogger
Use @p2pblog to tag me :-)
Posts: 355
Likes: 209
|
Post by Neil_P2PBlog on Nov 8, 2016 16:59:56 GMT
I think the really small ones have no email, if you check 'all active and past loans' you can often see small ones that came and went with no notice.
|
|
n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 882
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Nov 8, 2016 17:11:58 GMT
I think the really small ones have no email, if you check 'all active and past loans' you can often see small ones that came and went with no notice. I agree, but I wouldn't have thought 10K qualifies as a small one. I have certainly seen, and snagged bits of, sub 1K jewellery. All a matter of perspective I suppose.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Nov 8, 2016 21:23:23 GMT
I think the really small ones have no email, if you check 'all active and past loans' you can often see small ones that came and went with no notice. I agree, but I wouldn't have thought 10K qualifies as a small one. I have certainly seen, and snagged bits of, sub 1K jewellery. All a matter of perspective I suppose. I have seen larger loans appear without notice in the past, but only when they were renewals where most of the existing investors rolled their investment forward, meaning that there was little of the loan left for others when it appeared. But that's certainly not the case here. Perhaps FS concluded that it wasn't going to fill quickly so they didn't need to announce it in advance or apply a bid limit. Now, at least four hours after its release, it's still less than 40% funded. I used to support these loans, but I don't now because I've become concerned about the total amount lent to this one borrower. I don't know how big their whole collection is, but FS now have about £250k lent against the bits used as security so far. The loans regularly come up for renewal, and sometimes there's a new loan at about the same time, which suggests to me that the new loan is being taken in order to pay the interest/fees on the renewing loan. (About £35k of loans are coming due before Christmas.) My main concern is what would happen if the borrower runs out of additional collateral to use. Interest on the existing loans is accruing at over £30k/yr and FS fees must put the total payable into the £40-50k/yr range. If the borrower ever defaults, FS would have something like £400-500k of railway memorabilia to dispose of. And while I hope that the valuations FS have received are reasonable for the individual lots assessed, I can't help but think that a massive collection sold over a relatively short period would saturate a specialised market and noticeably depress the prices achievable. I should make it clear that I'm just speculating. I know nothing about the borrower's collection -- what they've pawned so far may be a very small portion of it. And they may be expecting a large lump of money in that would allow them to redeem all the loans easily. And I haven't a clue how big the market for these items is -- it might be so huge that a large collection such as this could be sold quickly for a price close to the valuation amounts. There are just too many uncertainties for me to feel comfortable lending more to this borrower. Others FS investors may be having similar thoughts, and that could explain why this loan is taking a while to become funded fully.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Nov 14, 2016 19:45:21 GMT
I've seen no mention of it here or on the website, but I received an email today saying that a new loan would be launched tomorrow. What I can't understand is why this second charge loan is being offered at just 12% -- especially since the first charge loan is at 59% LTV. It's a relatively small loan (£32k), and FS clearly think it's going to be very popular because they've said a £500 investment limit will be applied. I'll be surprised if it's funded quickly, but it won't be the first time I've been surprised by investors' appetites for loans I wouldn't touch.
|
|