Jaydee
Member of DD Central
Posts: 417
Likes: 791
|
Post by Jaydee on Apr 23, 2015 10:43:18 GMT
I have 4 loans awaiting repayment and FS appears to be accepting excuses from borrowers instead of chasing our money. I'm hoping the above is a little harsh. In some of the overdue cases FS have said that although they're still talking to the borrowers about potential full -- or, in one case, partial -- repayment, these discussions will not delay the disposal of the assets. One loan, for instance, has its security booked into an auction on 8/May. There's not much that can be done to hurry that process, so there's no reason to stop talking to the borrower before the auction date arrives. Having said that, though, there are a number of these overdue auctions where either there was a deadline stated that has passed, or where the most recent comment is a week or more old, so it would be appropriate for fundingsecure to provide further updates at this time. Noted mikes1531 I am frustrated at the lack of information posted by FS. It is very sporadic at best and non existent in some cases. I appreciate that there is a seven day grace period at the end of the loan period but some borrowers appear to be extending this beyond a reasonable time. Whilst our money is still earning interest, it is the uncertainty of the repayment date and if we will indeed get all our capital if the item has to be sold that concerns me. Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThing
|
|
|
Post by fundingsecure on Apr 23, 2015 11:22:40 GMT
New loan at 1pm tomorrow, Secured by a first (and sole) charge on a property valued at £175k £10,000 10% pa LTV 5.7% £100 bid restriction for first 24 hours More detailsFundingSecure
|
|
jonbvn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 326
Likes: 95
|
Post by jonbvn on Apr 23, 2015 12:09:25 GMT
I'm hoping the above is a little harsh. In some of the overdue cases FS have said that although they're still talking to the borrowers about potential full -- or, in one case, partial -- repayment, these discussions will not delay the disposal of the assets. One loan, for instance, has its security booked into an auction on 8/May. There's not much that can be done to hurry that process, so there's no reason to stop talking to the borrower before the auction date arrives. Having said that, though, there are a number of these overdue auctions where either there was a deadline stated that has passed, or where the most recent comment is a week or more old, so it would be appropriate for fundingsecure to provide further updates at this time. Noted mikes1531 I am frustrated at the lack of information posted by FS. It is very sporadic at best and non existent in some cases. I appreciate that there is a seven day grace period at the end of the loan period but some borrowers appear to be extending this beyond a reasonable time. Whilst our money is still earning interest, it is the uncertainty of the repayment date and if we will indeed get all our capital if the item has to be sold that concerns me. Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThingI too have recently invested in MoneyThing. I do like the personal touch currently offered by Ed and do like the feel of the MT platform. One of the concerns I have is that such a personal touch is not scalable.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Apr 23, 2015 12:39:46 GMT
Noted mikes1531 I am frustrated at the lack of information posted by FS. It is very sporadic at best and non existent in some cases. I appreciate that there is a seven day grace period at the end of the loan period but some borrowers appear to be extending this beyond a reasonable time. Whilst our money is still earning interest, it is the uncertainty of the repayment date and if we will indeed get all our capital if the item has to be sold that concerns me. Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThingI too have recently invested in MoneyThing. I do like the personal touch currently offered by Ed and do like the feel of the MT platform. One of the concerns I have is that such a personal touch is not scalable. It should be scalable although I doubt if it would always be with Ed direct. One the the 'secrets' in P2P world seems to be communication - or a lack of it with some platforms that just seem to float along the bottom of the barrel wondering why they haven't achieved 'lift-off'.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Apr 23, 2015 15:18:42 GMT
Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThingFS certainly aren't winning any prizes for their response here. And it's not as if they've been ignoring the forum, since they've regularly been posting notices of upcoming loans. They have, however, updated the comments on their website for at least one of the overdue loans. One the the 'secrets' in P2P world seems to be communication - or a lack of it with some platforms that just seem to float along the bottom of the barrel wondering why they haven't achieved 'lift-off'. The last two FS loans haven't exactly lifted off. I wasn't surprised by yesterday's. Yes, the LTV is very attractive, but a lot of investors probably already will have lent all they want to against that particular security. I am a bit surprised by today's slow uptake, though I suppose it isn't doing that badly -- it's about 55% funded after an hour, so I'll guess that it will reach full funding before the maximum lending amount restriction ends tomorrow afternoon. The LTV seems reasonable at 60%, but perhaps investors are a bit spooked by the current number of overdue loans, and the reports of some defaulting loans' security sales producing proceeds that are well under the amount needed to repay the capital lent, much less any of the accrued interest.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2015 15:38:45 GMT
Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThingFS certainly aren't winning any prizes for their response here. And it's not as if they've been ignoring the forum, since they've regularly been posting notices of upcoming loans. They have, however, updated the comments on their website for at least one of the overdue loans. One the the 'secrets' in P2P world seems to be communication - or a lack of it with some platforms that just seem to float along the bottom of the barrel wondering why they haven't achieved 'lift-off'. The last two FS loans haven't exactly lifted off. I wasn't surprised by yesterday's. Yes, the LTV is very attractive, but a lot of investors probably already will have lent all they want to against that particular security. I am a bit surprised by today's slow uptake, though I suppose it isn't doing that badly -- it's about 55% funded after an hour, so I'll guess that it will reach full funding before the maximum lending amount restriction ends tomorrow afternoon. The LTV seems reasonable at 60%, but perhaps investors are a bit spooked by the current number of overdue loans, and the reports of some defaulting loans' security sales producing proceeds that are well under the amount needed to repay the capital lent, much less any of the accrued interest. Given how bad or false the official forums for say FC are I suspect there is a real opportunity for some one offering P2P in an open chat market (i was think Roman Forum as an example) after all if we were all standing around in a true market square bidding to offer loans we would all be chattering away about the deals, while FC operates a very trad. slow Q&A. I suspect that MT is scaleable but whereas Ed seems to do most of the work he might have to decide about which bit he does, he seems to have great com skills so maybe he runs the forum and lender contacts and gets in a virtual loans manager next. Going to be interesting, but you can see why FS is stalling a bit, poor coms..
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Apr 23, 2015 16:31:00 GMT
Perhaps a more open response from FS would ease the situation. FS appears to be less responsive these days and that does not help relationships. This is one reason I moved some of my money to MoneyThingFS certainly aren't winning any prizes for their response here. And it's not as if they've been ignoring the forum, since they've regularly been posting notices of upcoming loans. They have, however, updated the comments on their website for at least one of the overdue loans. The last two FS loans haven't exactly lifted off. I wasn't surprised by yesterday's. Yes, the LTV is very attractive, but a lot of investors probably already will have lent all they want to against that particular security. I am a bit surprised by today's slow uptake, though I suppose it isn't doing that badly -- it's about 55% funded after an hour, so I'll guess that it will reach full funding before the maximum lending amount restriction ends tomorrow afternoon. The LTV seems reasonable at 60%, but perhaps investors are a bit spooked by the current number of overdue loans, and the reports of some defaulting loans' security sales producing proceeds that are well under the amount needed to repay the capital lent, much less any of the accrued interest. I'm not surprised about the 'spooked' comment and cannot disagree. I think some of the gloss has gone from FS when there was a great deal of clamour for what little was available. Whilst FS may be announcing new loans they are unfortunately a bit short on the detail at times - in fact fairly often. IIRC, loans were often backed by written valuations but now this seems to be a thing of the past in many cases. Today's jewellery collection has a valuation of 86k but just who has done the valuation. As we've seen from a couple of defaults recently the shortfall in actual monies realised and the original valuation is nothing short of a disaster which is something I suspect others in addition to myself will find more than alarming. Now a small variation here and there can be accepted but as FS move into higher value items then the valuations need to be more robust and IMO backed up. So whilst I've entered into the latest 86k loan, generally I'm in scale back mode.
|
|
|
Post by fundingsecure on Apr 23, 2015 16:50:11 GMT
New loan at 11:00 tomorrow Artwork (Including 4 Banksy's) £245,000 13% pa LTV 27.6% No bid restriction More detailsFundingSecure
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,337
Likes: 11,562
|
Post by ilmoro on Apr 23, 2015 17:03:00 GMT
Must be a St Georges Day offer. 13% & interest paid from the day before the loan is listed
|
|
baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 549
Likes: 407
|
Post by baldpate on Apr 23, 2015 18:27:10 GMT
In the blurb on the new loan coming tomorrow, is says:
Only some of the capital on the larger loan, despite the fact FS say both the previous loans will be closed. How will that work?
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Apr 23, 2015 18:39:05 GMT
In the blurb on the new loan coming tomorrow, is says: Only some of the capital on the larger loan, despite the fact FS say both the previous loans will be closed. How will that work? The rest will be paid off from the proceeds of tomorrow's £245k loan. Put another way, the £60k loan is being paid off completely, and £245k of the £275k loan will be rolled over into the new loan. It's a good move for the borrower as it will reduce their interest accruals considerably. In addition to the reduction in principal, the large previous loan also was paying bonus interest of up to 2% p.a., and that will stop with the refinancing.
|
|
baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 549
Likes: 407
|
Post by baldpate on Apr 23, 2015 21:27:30 GMT
I'm afraid I still don't get it. FS have said : "Both loans will be closed prior to the new loan being listed." So this is not a renewal of the existing larger loan, but a completely new loan (indeed it has to be, surely, because the composition of the security is different), and therefore rollover is not (or should not be) an option. The FS announcement certainly doesn't suggest it is an option.
In any case, I personally have not given my consent to rollover - so if FS are closing out the old loan, where is the money coming from to repay me (and others like me, who may not want to participate in the new loan) when the loan closes? That's the bit I don't get.
|
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,453
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Apr 24, 2015 1:40:54 GMT
I'm afraid I still don't get it. FS have said : "Both loans will be closed prior to the new loan being listed." So this is not a renewal of the existing larger loan, but a completely new loan (indeed it has to be, surely, because the composition of the security is different), and therefore rollover is not (or should not be) an option. The FS announcement certainly doesn't suggest it is an option. In any case, I personally have not given my consent to rollover - so if FS are closing out the old loan, where is the money coming from to repay me (and others like me, who may not want to participate in the new loan) when the loan closes? That's the bit I don't get. I understand the confusion. I referred to it a rollover/renewal because I expect that's what it will look like to the borrower. I honestly don't expect them to repay the last £245k to FS one day and have FS send it back to them later that day or the next day. From the point of view of FS lenders, it will look like two loans completely paid off and a new loan to the same borrower using most of the same security. I expect that most of the money credited to FS lenders' accounts tomorrow morning will be reoffered on the new loan at 11am. And FS have a good idea of what lenders intend to do because they know what proportion have set the old loans to renew automatically. So the funds FS have to have available for withdrawal will be only a fraction of the £245k being 'rolled over'. They probably can cover that need from their own working capital. And if they're worried that they might not be able to cover it, then they'll have arranged for an underwriter to provide the funds for the short period they might need them. In short, I expect that most of the payout of the old loans and the setting up of the new loan will be accomplished by accounting entries rather than actually moving any money around. But that's JMHO.
|
|
baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 549
Likes: 407
|
Post by baldpate on Apr 24, 2015 7:46:15 GMT
mikes1531, Thanks for you time & trouble in explaining this. It now makes sense on the assumption that FS would 'bridge' the loan from their own resources (or temporary underwriting). It just didn't occur to me that they might be prepared to do that. Indeed, looking at my account this morning I see I have received full capital repayment on both loan - so unless FS are being 'creative' with the book-keeping, it must be as you describe. Thanks again.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,337
Likes: 11,562
|
Post by ilmoro on Apr 24, 2015 10:07:36 GMT
mikes1531, Thanks for you time & trouble in explaining this. It now makes sense on the assumption that FS would 'bridge' the loan from their own resources (or temporary underwriting). It just didn't occur to me that they might be prepared to do that. Indeed, looking at my account this morning I see I have received full capital repayment on both loan - so unless FS are being 'creative' with the book-keeping, it must be as you describe. Thanks again. Looks like they had 100k they knew was going to flip into the new loan so any exposure on a temporary bridge was reduced
|
|