registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 6,437
|
Post by registerme on May 12, 2015 22:11:23 GMT
Specifically regarding individual loans, so no portfolio management / diversification issues etc.
For me it's things like:-
negative shareholder funds P&L / BS that I can't get my head around a poor credit rating no asset security / director guarantee (though how much this is worth I have yet to see) a complex company structure businesses I don't like for some reason eg restaurants or legal practices lazy approach to the "business profile" not answering questions from potential lenders, and not answering clearly use of words like holistic, synergistic or paradigm when talking about a corner shop in pick your arbitrary remote location
|
|
LA
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by LA on May 13, 2015 2:31:53 GMT
When I first started using FC invested using autobid feature and whilst I have no reason to complain I now; using the filters look for businesses operating in a particular sector or sectors. Healthcare being my favorite currently. Interestingly I've started looking for companies too nearby to me; strange behaviour..
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on May 13, 2015 7:26:42 GMT
Specifically regarding individual loans, so no portfolio management / diversification issues etc. For me it's things like:- negative shareholder funds P&L / BS that I can't get my head around a poor credit rating no asset security / director guarantee (though how much this is worth I have yet to see) a complex company structure businesses I don't like for some reason eg restaurants or legal practices lazy approach to the "business profile" not answering questions from potential lenders, and not answering clearly use of words like holistic, synergistic or paradigm when talking about a corner shop in pick your arbitrary remote locationSo what proportion of new listings make it past your filters then? My guess is not very many. I tend to the other approach of bidding on most things to a modest extent, but only down to a rate I know I can move on quickly on the SM if I want to. When I find that bids have been successful (not often these days!), I then decide how long to keep it (and how much) based on the information provided. Otherwise I'd spend endless hours doing pointless DD on loans I'm never going to own.
|
|
registerme
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 6,437
|
Post by registerme on May 13, 2015 11:33:05 GMT
Certainly not as many as I would like at rates I'm prepared to accept, which is why I find myself bottom fishing in the SM for value. Whether or not this will work as a strategy over the long term remains to be seen.... To your point about "successful bidding not happening often these days", I guess I find pointless due diligence more entertaining than pointless bidding . More seriously, I like your approach, and can see how it can work.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2015 12:35:00 GMT
If you want to sell me a loan
1) no restaurants 2) no aircraft 3) no trucks 4) no borrowing beyond 2x profit 5) no multiple loans (the third to do the same as the first two) 6) no 60 month loan to deal with a 6 month cash flow problem 7) no tax bill (has your accountant been sacked yet?) 8) no multiple business owner with high net worth who has a cash flow problem 9) nothing that is written badly, spelling or just doesn't explain what a business does or why it needs what it does 10) nothing that suggest the director has a hobby, special girlfriend, cross subsidised business interests which will suck out the money 11) no golf courses 12) no farming 13) no building change that needs planning permission as yet unreceived 14) no pawn based on >70% LTV at retail not scrap value 15) no art! 16) no low margin businesses with invoice factoring (duh) 17) poor credit history (probably the most important) 18) no mummy and daddy is giving the business to the kid, who has great experience running a different business and just needs a little help along with his uncle who went bust yesterday and needs a job and will do what he is told, honestly, and by the way mummy and daddy will continue to hold all the purse strings and take consultant's fees and may move all the assets somewhere else if things go wrong. 19) no busy fools (ie T/O £8M, profit £50k, multiple stuff)
I worry if the issue is a recovery due to recent CEO loss (insurance guys)....
but on the positive 1) secure government based income streams 2) waste management (muck->brass) 3) retail with at least 10 years life and unique selling proposition 4) pawn with LTV<70% at retail 5) 10% as an average objective after fees and a default margin, though will drop down way below this figure to keep on the 10% average.
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 3,237
|
Post by jonno on May 13, 2015 13:00:39 GMT
What fails my sniff test re any arbitrary loan?
If it appears on this platform.
|
|
markr
Member of DD Central
Posts: 766
Likes: 426
|
Post by markr on May 13, 2015 21:14:51 GMT
For me: 1) Companies with Solutions in their name 2) Loans with punny titles like "Copper load of this" 3) Loans to repay other loans (FC or otherwise)
I'm happy with 12 month tax loans though, after all only profitable companies pay tax.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,003
Likes: 5,139
|
Post by adrianc on May 13, 2015 21:34:31 GMT
If you want to sell me a loan 1) no restaurants 2) no aircraft 3) no trucks 4) no borrowing beyond 2x profit 5) no multiple loans (the third to do the same as the first two) 6) no 60 month loan to deal with a 6 month cash flow problem 7) no tax bill (has your accountant been sacked yet?) 8) no multiple business owner with high net worth who has a cash flow problem 9) nothing that is written badly, spelling or just doesn't explain what a business does or why it needs what it does 10) nothing that suggest the director has a hobby, special girlfriend, cross subsidised business interests which will suck out the money 11) no golf courses 12) no farming 13) no building change that needs planning permission as yet unreceived 14) no pawn based on >70% LTV at retail not scrap value 15) no art! 16) no low margin businesses with invoice factoring (duh) 17) poor credit history (probably the most important) 18) no mummy and daddy is giving the business to the kid, who has great experience running a different business and just needs a little help along with his uncle who went bust yesterday and needs a job and will do what he is told, honestly, and by the way mummy and daddy will continue to hold all the purse strings and take consultant's fees and may move all the assets somewhere else if things go wrong. 19) no busy fools (ie T/O £8M, profit £50k, multiple stuff) I worry if the issue is a recovery due to recent CEO loss (insurance guys).... but on the positive 1) secure government based income streams 2) waste management (muck->brass) 3) retail with at least 10 years life and unique selling proposition 4) pawn with LTV<70% at retail 5) 10% as an average objective after fees and a default margin, though will drop down way below this figure to keep on the 10% average. <blink> Have you actually lent to ANYbody?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 8:48:10 GMT
LOL Oh yes You do have to focus a bit but I guess I have made loans to some 250-300 organisations in the last 9 months using 5 portals and so far three have approached some sort of default with two sold off at a premium and one in admin (assets now sold and awaiting final decisions but looking like I will get the capital back).
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2015 8:58:30 GMT
For me: 1) Companies with Solutions in their name 2) Loans with punny titles like "Copper load of this" 3) Loans to repay other loans (FC or otherwise) I'm happy with 12 month tax loans though, after all only profitable companies pay tax. My only concern about borrowing to pay the tax, is not that profitable companies should not pay tax, but that a good accountant will see the cash problem and act accordingly, so claiming "it is to pay tax" misses the point, they have over-traded in some other part of the business and the tax claim is just a distraction. So what I see when I read that is "we have over-traded and lost control of our cash flow, now the chickens have come home to roost and we cannot dodge the cash flow issue any more, so let's blame the tax man as it suggests we have been overcome by our own success" I don't want my assets being managed by people who overtrade. After all, if they do it once and survive they will see it as a licence to do it again. I've been in businesses where the CEO does not work within his cash constraints and it is very unpleasant. I don't see why my money should reinforce this bad behaviour. Note that after a recession it is over-trading that causes most companies to go bust as they struggle to make the best use of their cash flow.
|
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on May 14, 2015 10:27:54 GMT
My only concern about borrowing to pay the tax, is not that profitable companies should not pay tax, but that a good accountant will see the cash problem and act accordingly, so claiming "it is to pay tax" misses the point, they have over-traded in some other part of the business and the tax claim is just a distraction. So what I see when I read that is "we have over-traded and lost control of our cash flow, now the chickens have come home to roost and we cannot dodge the cash flow issue any more, so let's blame the tax man as it suggests we have been overcome by our own success" Generally, I'd tend to see the loans nominally to pay tax, and the loans nominally to pay for "working capital" as essentially the same. Suppose that a company has a tax bill of around £20k, and current working capital that they intend to use for other purposes in excess of £20k. They get a loan for £20k and pay the tax bill, then go on to spend the £20k that they would otherwise have been obliged to use on the tax bill for the purposes they had already earmarked it. Do they describe the loan as "for the tax bill" because that's what they actually did with that tranche of money, or as "for working capital" (or even some more specific plan), because that's what they'd have to forego if they didn't get the loan approved? Except for asset purchase transactions (where the loan advance will be paid directly to a supplier, and legal title to the asset comes to the lenders), I'd see the stated loan purpose as largely irrelevant "fluff" - you're making a loan to a business for it to use as it sees fit, and as part of the process the business can identify at least one expense that the loan can be taken as being nominally "for the purpose of". If a business were in such dire straits that a decline on the loan application would leave them physically unable to pay the tax bill by any other means, we probably shouldn't be lending to them ... but I would hope such businesses wouldn't make it through to the website.
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on May 14, 2015 12:04:34 GMT
1) Old biddy homes 2) Layabout student (second) homes 3) Anything to do with Israel 4) Anything with a higher LTV than 70% (some exceptions made on further digging) 5) No cash 6) Making a loss 7) Paying massive tax bill 8) Claims companies/lawyers etc 9) Pencil pushers; creative "ideas" companies etc with no viable assets to liquidate and no clear vision of what work they do or value they add to the world (If all I wanted from a return on my investment was hot air I would buy baked beans and bottle my farts!)
Obviously a couple of these are personal preferences not based on likely default/risk but just stuff I'm not prepared to support.
|
|
|
Post by thesnoop on May 14, 2015 13:11:10 GMT
I dislike when profits repeatedly disappear out of the Ltd Company or partnership ... while they maintain a scary overdraft or some other sketchy balancing act... then use a From Chumps unsecured loan to finance their next great idea.
|
|
sl125
Member of DD Central
Posts: 85
Likes: 64
|
Post by sl125 on May 14, 2015 15:25:24 GMT
I'd also caution against the "paying the tax man" 12 month loans. Just because a company is technically "profitable" and therefore has a corporation tax liability does not mean they are running a financially prudent business.
It quite often masks a personal services company extracting as much cash out of the company, because the directors of such companies are often poorly disciplined to not think of their company's bank account as being available for their personal use. I've met far too many IT contractors etc that fall into the trap of extracting all the cash from their company, spending it on a "lavish" lifestyle, then get stung when the corp tax bill arrives 9 months after their trading year.
In other words, it's often a warning sign that the director isn't financially prudent.
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on May 14, 2015 15:37:50 GMT
I dislike when profits repeatedly disappear out of the Ltd Company or partnership ... while they maintain a scary overdraft or some other sketchy balancing act... then use a From Chumps unsecured loan to finance their next great idea. Sounds like preety much every convenience store loan ever!
|
|