duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 6,982
|
Post by duck on Feb 28, 2014 8:23:39 GMT
I run a Limited Company (one man band) and over the years the business has built up savings which will eventually be my ‘pension’.
As with personal savings rates have dropped badly and whilst I have accepted this up until now, I have been spurred into life on this front with a notification that the instant access account that the company has been using is dropping to 0.75%. Accepting that the money has to remain inside the Ltd Co to avoid a personal tax liability and that a level of risk is acceptable but very high risk is not (responsibility as director), what options are open?
I’ve previously cleared the VAT position with HMRC with respect to interest so that is one hurdle cleared. However is there a possibility of CCL issues arising? (I remember a thread on I believe the ‘old’ forum)
What P2P (and similar) sites accept ‘business cash’ and do any have any distinct advantages (thinking offsetting losses here)? I’ve deliberately left the options on this thread very open in order that others in a similar position can benefit.
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Feb 28, 2014 8:38:31 GMT
I’ve previously cleared the VAT position with HMRC with respect to interest so that is one hurdle cleared. However is there a possibility of CCL issues arising? (I remember a thread on I believe the ‘old’ forum) What P2P (and similar) sites accept ‘business cash’ and do any have any distinct advantages (thinking offsetting losses here)? I’ve deliberately left the options on this thread very open in order that others in a similar position can benefit.
Definitely distinct tax advantages to lending through a company as you can offset capital losses against interest in the case of those platforms which don't already deal with this via the provision fund mechansim. My understanding. As far as I know, is up till now they have all accepted business cash. With regulation on tax deduction/withholding tax the situation may be about to become a bit more complicated.
|
|
jhma
Member of DD Central
Posts: 82
Likes: 53
|
Post by jhma on Feb 28, 2014 8:44:53 GMT
Confirming Bracknell Boy's post
My company has now been investing in p2p and p2b for just over a year after extensive research. All major sites that I am aware of accept business funds. Losses deductable from Corporation Tax payments. I can see no downside to this route at present. My excel-based accounting of interest received has been acceptable to our accountant.
We will have to see what will happen to payments net of tax deductions when or if it happens.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 6,982
|
Post by duck on Feb 28, 2014 9:03:19 GMT
Thanks for your comments, my research so far also suggests a diversification into p2p/ptb to be positive for the business but what I haven't 'sorted' in my brain is the credit license position especially if I took 6 months off .... which would lead to interest being the major/only income stream for that time.
I agree, just like the much mooted combining of NI and Income tax.
|
|
|
Post by bengilbert on Feb 28, 2014 9:14:22 GMT
There was some discussion of the CCL issue here: p2pindependentforum.com/thread/247/lending-limited-companyMy understanding (not a tax advisor) is that you don't need a license for loans to limited companies, or loans to individuals/partnerships which are over £25,000 and where the loan is to be used for business purposes. The outstanding question is whether, when your company lends under £25,000 on a loan which in total is over £25,000, you need a license or not. (Source: www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft140a.pdf on the Consumer Credit Act 1974 '3.21 The Act does not regulate: • a consumer credit agreement by which the creditor provides credit exceeding £25,000, or • a consumer hire agreement requiring the hirer to make payments exceeding £25,000 provided in each case that the agreement is entered into by the debtor or hirer wholly or predominantly for the purposes of a business carried on, or intended to be carried on, by him. 3.22 An agreement is presumed to be wholly or predominantly for business purposes if it includes a declaration to that effect by the debtor or hirer, in a prescribed form, unless the creditor or owner knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that this is not the case. 'Business' is defined in section 189 of the Act, but a person is not to be treated as carrying on a particular type of business merely because occasionally he enters into relevant transactions.')
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 6,982
|
Post by duck on Feb 28, 2014 11:23:51 GMT
Thanks for that link(s) bengilbert, I did a search on 'Limited Company' but that thread didn't show up!
I have a feeling I will be digging into the CCA this weekend. So far my dealings with HMRC (and similar) leave me with the distinct feeling that they are struggling to keep up with the changing 'lending' world and would prefer to keep the waters muddied. Somehow I feel total clarity of the CCA (and the outstanding questions) will not be forthcoming, I base this feeling on my experience of the so called 'IR35' which after 10 years is still far from clear even though it hangs continually over companies such as mine.
|
|
|
Post by wiseclerk on Mar 1, 2014 10:59:12 GMT
This sounds interesting. As a non-UK resident I am not that familiar with the circumstances.
Two question that would interest me:
1) Has anyone set up a Ltd for the sole purpose of investing in p2p loans? Experiences? Or would it not make any difference whether a Ltd is actually operating in a different field and investing some of it's proceeds in p2p loans or whether it was actually set up to do just that and is not doing anything else?
2) What are the yearly overhead costs for the Ltd. e.g. accountant , ... I know this all depends again, but if anyone is doing this already pls just share your experiences on overhead costs. Thx.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Mar 1, 2014 17:20:14 GMT
There is a thread on the old TC forum. If you have access to it, here is the link: www.forum.thincats.net/forums/topic/using-companies-on-thincats/On costs, the bottom line is that if you do everything yourself using the free templates available online (see links below) the only absolutely unavoidable costs are £13 to form the company and £14 per annum to file the annual return online. (These figures are from the TC thread, I have not checked to see if they are up to date.) www.hmrc.gov.uk/ct/online-sample-accounts/www.hmrc.gov.uk/ct/ct-online/file-return/joint-filing.htmOne TC member raised a concern that loans from the director/shareholder to the company might be "deposits" for regulatory purposes, in which case a company set up for the purpose of lending would be regulated as a bank (!), if it was so funded. www.fca.org.uk/your-fca/documents/am-i-a-bank-diagramI think this is unlikely but the regulatory definition of a deposit is somewhat obscure and we never did bottom this out. I should add that the member who raised this concern was himself lending through a company, but the main activity of his company was something completely different and he was happy that in this case it would not be caught.
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 790
Member is Online
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Mar 4, 2014 20:16:28 GMT
I have some deposits with Zopa through a Ltd company. I selected Zopa because they seem to be the easiest to liquidate the loans if there is some clarification in what seems to be a totally undefined part of the law. It will probably be easier to get clarification on the CCL issue and Ltd companies one the FCA start to regulate this sector. If it looks like there might be an issue I should be able to sell my loans well before it becomes a problem.
|
|
|
Post by jackpease on Mar 5, 2014 10:15:26 GMT
I lend through my ltd company but i'm sure i read in this thread or somewhere else that it was *not* tax efficient - i'm sure i read an argument saying that p2p interest would be taxed as corporation tax (c20%) then would be personal taxed again even if you draw income as dividends - so why not just invest in a personal capacity?
I take the view that as long p2p interest doesn't exceed 10% of company income then i won't fall foul of any laws limiting what a ltd company can earn through lending
Jack
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 790
Member is Online
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Mar 5, 2014 11:40:09 GMT
I lend through my ltd company but i'm sure i read in this thread or somewhere else that it was *not* tax efficient - i'm sure i read an argument saying that p2p interest would be taxed as corporation tax (c20%) then would be personal taxed again even if you draw income as dividends - so why not just invest in a personal capacity? I take the view that as long p2p interest doesn't exceed 10% of company income then i won't fall foul of any laws limiting what a ltd company can earn through lending Jack You do not pay tax twice on dividends, you get a tax credit covering the basic rate of tax when you pay a dividend on taxed funds. If you have a company that has cash in it then P2P offers a much better return than a bank deposit. There is also the advantage of being able to offset bad loans against interest on your balanace sheet if you are going down the Funding Circle path (which you cant do yourself). The only thing is what the status of a company that lends through a P2P network is via the Consumer Credit License, at the moment this seems to be a bit "undefined" and is one of those grey areas of the law. To be honest running your own company without an accountant is pretty straight forward unless you are doing alot of complex transactions, you just need a template for the accounts to be submitted and a bit of common sense. The days in which paying £1000 a year to have someone type a few numbers into a spreadsheet and submit your accounts for you because they are a respected accountant who is known to the local tax office are gone IMO, the tax inspector is basically a computer at HMRC now.
|
|
|
Post by jackpease on Mar 5, 2014 12:41:57 GMT
>>>You do not pay tax twice on dividends, you get a tax credit covering the basic rate of tax when you pay a dividend on taxed funds.
talk me through this with a worked example Ltd company invests £1000 with p2p firm, at year end gets £100 interest (say) The £100 is profit is then taxed at 20% (corporation tax) so becomes £80 The director then draws that £80 as dividends The director then declares that £80 as income - then is taxed basic/high rate on that income.
If you are saying that that the director don't pay personal tax on dividends based on taxed p2p interest then i guess i have been badly advised
thanks
jack
|
|
j
Member of DD Central
Penguins are very misunderstood!
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 540
|
Post by j on Mar 5, 2014 13:02:06 GMT
There is also the advantage of being able to offset bad loans against interest on your balanace sheet if you are going down the Funding Circle path (which you cant do yourself). 1. I'm sure I've read somewhere that at the moment you cannot offset bad debt from investing into p2p against tax liability (ie you sinply have to take any losses on the chin) Have I got this wrong or is there a different rule for ltd cos? 2. Did I understand this correctly, if you set up a ltd co, you can treat the profit from p2p as dividends & only pay 20%, instead of say 40% if you're a higher rate tax payer? Thanks
|
|
j
Member of DD Central
Penguins are very misunderstood!
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 540
|
Post by j on Mar 5, 2014 13:06:46 GMT
>>>You do not pay tax twice on dividends, you get a tax credit covering the basic rate of tax when you pay a dividend on taxed funds. talk me through this with a worked example Ltd company invests £1000 with p2p firm, at year end gets £100 interest (say) The £100 is profit is then taxed at 20% (corporation tax) so becomes £80 The director then draws that £80 as dividends The director then declares that £80 as income - then is taxed basic/high rate on that income. If you are saying that that the director don't pay personal tax on dividends based on taxed p2p interest then i guess i have been badly advised thanks jack If the above is correct, you would end up with £48 if you are a higher rate tax payer (after £20 tax on £100 divi, you have £80, taxed at 40%, leaves you with £48, as opposed to £100 income @ 40%, giving £60 net), that makes no sense to me as you might as well declare profit as personal extra income rather than divi through a ltd co. Am I barking up the wrong ally here?
|
|
|
Post by jackpease on Mar 5, 2014 13:17:24 GMT
>>>>>you can treat the profit from p2p as dividends & only pay 20%, As i understand it no because an individual is taxed on dividend income, at the higher rate if a higher rate taxpayer - hence my 'taxed twice' query!
|
|