Obsolete - do not use until updated. IM

Generally, the only way to identify the borrower is using the valuation report for clues & then do some detective work. For some loans its obvious, same location, for others it only becomes obvious after a 'clue' eg a similar update, as in the case of the two land blocks in Wales/Scotland. One advantage of this forum is there are some quite good DD detectives.

While the borrower is the same, the security is still distinct so a recovery scenario in most cases would be dependent on each asset individually. Where I think there is more of an issue is where the assets are concurrent eg elements of PBL37,38.39, 69, 70, 71, or the 4 farmland tranches, where it may be harder to recover security seperately. Obviously the danger with one borrower is all the loans go pop together but the risk is to some extent mitigated by the retention of interest up front so you have at least (given lack of clarity on terms in some cases) a 6 month period when risk appears lower. Personally I am happy to hold parts of  (concurrent) loans with a common borrower to aid investment speed and base diversification but limit total investment to a sum across all elements that is less than the cumulative sum I would invest if they were separate and definately sell down significantly in advance of indicated (or estimated) redemption date. One other thing to bear in mind is that most loans have secondary security of a debenture & PG but the exact nature of these isnt well defined so could well be secured against the same personal assets/company and if called could have an impact on the other loans. eg Watford loans have corporate cross-guarentees.

ilmoro's list shows related loans pretty comprehensively! Look at the letters against the loan numbers

It's possible, but I think/hope we have combed most of the linkages out of the undergrowth by now.
You could try asking SS .. I think linked loans is one of the things they really ought to be rather clearer about. ilmoro does a fine job, but it really ought to be savingstream saying it, officially.

Yes, it exists. You've included the link to the current status (just under £2m currently) at the top of your own post. How it would be deployed in the event of a default shortfall is not defined since this is at the discretion of the provision fund directors.

Thanks guys. I don't know what's the matter with me, I just couldn't see it and it was at my fingertips.