adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,014 
Likes: 5,143
|
Post by adrianc on Jun 8, 2016 8:34:05 GMT
The bright shiny pristine rally car now has flecks of mud and obvious dents and the driver who it was believed could walk on water has been shown to be just another guy. Rally cars get muddy and battered. It goes with the territory. ANY driver is "just another guy", nobody walks on water.
|
|
|
|
Post by supernumerary on Jun 8, 2016 9:32:31 GMT
You asked a question and horr1997 replied to your thread.  If you asked a question, why are you complaining about the response? The question is pretty specific 'should we be worried' the question did not ask about my experience as an investor nor did i ask for his opinion about my investments. if @horr1997 wish's to know my opinion or investment circumstances , he's free to ask, but if he wish's to insinuate my circumstances in a post then i will reply. earthbound, RE: “if @horr1997 wish's to know my opinion or investment circumstances , he's free to ask, but if he wish's to insinuate my circumstances in a post then i will reply.” As you have indeed done so, which is your right to reply. Now that you have defended your reputation, perhaps you would be so kind to explain what you mean by; Well.. there has been a lot of speculation over the last week, wild accusations, law suits and now clear outs on the SM.. so.. For instance; [1] What speculation are you specifically referring to? [2] What wild accusations and when? [3] Which particular lawsuits? [4] What type of ‘clear outs on the SM’ are you referring to, above and beyond the normal secondary market activity? Having been very quick to defend your OWN reputation against insinuations towards your own circumstances, then surely it would not be fair, to make insinuations against Saving Stream? BTW, I don’t work for Saving Stream.
|
|
Steerpike
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 1,687
|
Post by Steerpike on Jun 8, 2016 10:17:34 GMT
The bright shiny pristine rally car now has flecks of mud and obvious dents and the driver who it was believed could walk on water has been shown to be just another guy. Rally cars get muddy and battered. It goes with the territory. ANY driver is "just another guy", nobody walks on water. Quite, but as we have seen it takes a bit more than those oft repeated truisms to hold back the growth of the irrational exuberance associated with this platform and clear evidence of potential loss is good cause to review investments.
|
|
|
|
Post by earthbound on Jun 8, 2016 10:41:16 GMT
The question is pretty specific 'should we be worried' the question did not ask about my experience as an investor nor did i ask for his opinion about my investments. if @horr1997 wish's to know my opinion or investment circumstances , he's free to ask, but if he wish's to insinuate my circumstances in a post then i will reply. earthbound, RE: “if @horr1997 wish's to know my opinion or investment circumstances , he's free to ask, but if he wish's to insinuate my circumstances in a post then i will reply.” As you have indeed done so, which is your right to reply. Now that you have defended your reputation, perhaps you would be so kind to explain what you mean by; Well.. there has been a lot of speculation over the last week, wild accusations, law suits and now clear outs on the SM.. so.. For instance; [1] What speculation are you specifically referring to? [2] What wild accusations and when? [3] Which particular lawsuits? [4] What type of ‘clear outs on the SM’ are you referring to, above and beyond the normal secondary market activity? Having been very quick to defend your OWN reputation against insinuations towards your own circumstances, then surely it would not be fair, to make insinuations against Saving Stream? BTW, I don’t work for Saving Stream. I'll assume you've been hibernating.
|
|
|
|
Post by meledor on Jun 8, 2016 14:05:01 GMT
earthbound, RE: “if @horr1997 wish's to know my opinion or investment circumstances , he's free to ask, but if he wish's to insinuate my circumstances in a post then i will reply.” As you have indeed done so, which is your right to reply. Now that you have defended your reputation, perhaps you would be so kind to explain what you mean by; For instance; [1] What speculation are you specifically referring to? [2] What wild accusations and when? [3] Which particular lawsuits? [4] What type of ‘clear outs on the SM’ are you referring to, above and beyond the normal secondary market activity? Having been very quick to defend your OWN reputation against insinuations towards your own circumstances, then surely it would not be fair, to make insinuations against Saving Stream? BTW, I don’t work for Saving Stream. I'll assume you've been hibernating. And I'll assume you cannot answer straightforward questions.
|
|
|
|
Post by earthbound on Jun 8, 2016 14:09:16 GMT
I'll assume you've been hibernating. And I'll assume you cannot answer straightforward questions. And you will have assumed correct.
|
|
