sl75
Posts: 2,092 
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Jun 15, 2016 10:24:08 GMT
On my account / browser, I see the correct pre-fund amounts in "table" mode, and on the individual loan pages (where it's a drop-down box), but if I switch to "slabs" mode (I think the only mode allowed on mobile browsers), the (non-editable) pre-fund amount below the picture shows zero.
|
|
ped
Member of DD Central
Posts: 255
Likes: 84
|
Post by ped on Jun 15, 2016 10:24:29 GMT
109 with 94K on SM, all 365 term so thats nice.
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Jun 15, 2016 10:25:32 GMT
PBL107 only 1345 investors, several hundred below the peak numbers. I guess its just these loans but who knows.
|
|
treeman
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 557
|
Post by treeman on Jun 15, 2016 10:26:31 GMT
109 has 94k left over ............ got what I PF'd for on the first 3 - guess the total today going live exceeds the appetite.
|
|
|
|
Post by lb on Jun 15, 2016 10:28:22 GMT
365 days interest is ~ £2m ... so is the borrower (cumulatively) only getting £10m and SS retain £2m or thereabouts?
|
|
locutus
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1,622
|
Post by locutus on Jun 15, 2016 10:28:49 GMT
PBL110 was funded bottom up despite being greater than £1 million. Have the rules changed? Very annoyed...  |
|
sl75
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 1,245
|
Post by sl75 on Jun 15, 2016 10:32:18 GMT
PBL110 was funded bottom up despite being < £1 million. Have the rules changed? Very annoyed... More annoying is that they've not yet processed the instant transfer that I sent them first thing this morning to cover my intended purchases, so are falsely claiming I've got negative available funds and forbidding me from selling the excess.
|
|
jhma
Member of DD Central
Posts: 82
Likes: 53
|
Post by jhma on Jun 15, 2016 10:32:33 GMT
On my account / browser, I see the correct pre-fund amounts in "table" mode, and on the individual loan pages (where it's a drop-down box), but if I switch to "slabs" mode (I think the only mode allowed on mobile browsers), the (non-editable) pre-fund amount below the picture shows zero. Thanks - can confirm this behaviour. Waiting to see if I get the PF amount in 113/115. I had zero set in earlier numbers anyway
|
|
Liz
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1,297
|
Post by Liz on Jun 15, 2016 10:37:40 GMT
Lots of people arent going to be able to fullfill their prefund, with the SM the way it is.
|
|
pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922 
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on Jun 15, 2016 10:39:15 GMT
PBL110 was funded bottom up despite being greater than £1 million. Have the rules changed? Very annoyed... Eh? 110 is 1.2M and I got 100%...
|
|
gt94sss2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 281
Likes: 137
|
Post by gt94sss2 on Jun 15, 2016 10:44:37 GMT
Just got 100% of my PF in 111 and 113 - not a problem as I only bid for what I wanted - but very surprised given how small these loans were.
Edit: also 100% of 115!
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,026
Likes: 5,152
|
Post by adrianc on Jun 15, 2016 10:44:39 GMT
More annoying is that they've not yet processed the instant transfer that I sent them first thing this morning to cover my intended purchases, so are falsely claiming I've got negative available funds and forbidding me from selling the excess. I sent a payment fairly late last night, credited this morning.
|
|
locutus
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1,622
|
Post by locutus on Jun 15, 2016 10:46:01 GMT
PBL110 was funded bottom up despite being greater than £1 million. Have the rules changed? Very annoyed... Eh? 110 is 1.2M and I got 100%... It was definitely funded bottom up. I had asked for a very large allocation (I didn't want the other loans) and only got £2,600. I thought loans greater than £1 million were supposed to be a percentage of allocation requested?
|
|
|
|
Post by portlandbill on Jun 15, 2016 10:48:00 GMT
Lots of people arent going to be able to fullfill their prefund, with the SM the way it is. Then they shouldn't have prefunded then should they!
|
|
|
|
Post by trilby on Jun 15, 2016 10:48:08 GMT
I guess it's not intentional that PBL111 has 0 days remaining?
|
|
