littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Oct 8, 2016 14:09:11 GMT
Looks like a bargain then? I am tempted. Later: I have bought it. Wow you're brave...! So now that you can presumably see the offer, was it a bargain? Then again I guess you'll get at least one rent payment out of it so that should cover some of it. Was it still 5% fee? I have quite a few from SPV16 onwards on sale with better rental records than that one if you fancy...  The fee is now only 2%. There is no information on the sale on the site even though I am now a shareholder, so I have asked PM to send me the emails they sent to shareholders. I will have a look at other properties on the SM, but I might need a 2% discount to cover the PM fee.
|
|
pom
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,922 
Likes: 1,244
|
Post by pom on Oct 8, 2016 14:59:33 GMT
Hmm that's a shame - given it says "you must own shares to see messages" you'd rather expect them to then appear!
Depends what you mean by discount really - all of mine are at discounts on current value, and when listed were the cheapest...tho I see I've been undercut on a few properties now...someone's selling quite a few shares for £490 or £495 in fact ! Personally I'm not that desperate to sell! Anyway I'm selling 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, some of which have actually performed really well, I'm not totally selling out of any of them, just seeing if I can thin some of them down a bit and free up money for future properties. I might be prepared to change prices on some of them.
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Oct 11, 2016 18:49:33 GMT
That makes it sound like the sale has completed. I have not heard that it has.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,983 
Likes: 5,131
Member is Online
|
Post by adrianc on Oct 17, 2016 8:14:42 GMT
That makes it sound like the sale has completed. I have not heard that it has. The link doesn't work, and the blog post isn't on the main blog page, so I guess it was a bit premature...
|
|
j
Member of DD Central
Penguins are very misunderstood!
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 540
|
Post by j on Oct 20, 2016 21:00:47 GMT
Property: PM SPV 1 Total net returns: 14.01% Annualised net returns: 7% We are hopeful that confidence will grow now we have overseen our first successful exit, and we are soon scheduled to be exiting up to 5 each month. Combined with the Secondary Market, which launched earlier this month, we are confident that we are giving our members the tools they need to potentially benefit from investing with us. The sector has certainly come of age, and the concrete evidence of a successful exit by Property Moose will hopefully be the first of many. Written by Jenna Kamal Was this a 2 or 3 year term spv? I'm trying to gauge the total 'net' return taking into account both rent & any upside on sale price after fees, etc. Or is 14.01% equivalent to 7% overall return over a 2 yr terms??
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 9,983
Likes: 5,131
Member is Online
|
Post by adrianc on Oct 20, 2016 21:12:59 GMT
I thought THC had had a few complete already? Or is there some subtle distinction that's being drawn between them?
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Oct 21, 2016 7:39:18 GMT
It was a 2 year term. If it returns 14% (depends on sale price and AFAIK no contracts exchanged yet) this will represent 7% pa without compounding. or c6.75% pa with. There was a long void period so most of the shortfall against the predicted 19% may be in the rent rather than the capital growth. Remains to be seen.
|
|
j
Member of DD Central
Penguins are very misunderstood!
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 540
|
Post by j on Oct 30, 2016 21:26:23 GMT
It was a 2 year term. If it returns 14% (depends on sale price and AFAIK no contracts exchanged yet) this will represent 7% pa without compounding. or c6.75% pa with. There was a long void period so most of the shortfall against the predicted 19% may be in the rent rather than the capital growth. Remains to be seen. Thanks for info
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Jan 31, 2017 16:26:14 GMT
4 months later and they say it has finally sold, but they don't say for how much and no sign of the money yet. If this is a typical end of term performance it does not bode well.
|
|
|
|
Post by sayyestocress on Feb 1, 2017 16:04:04 GMT
4 months later and they say it has finally sold, but they don't say for how much and no sign of the money yet. If this is a typical end of term performance it does not bode well. Do the shareholders not get a say on whether to sell or not based on the sale price?
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Feb 1, 2017 17:50:42 GMT
4 months later and they say it has finally sold, but they don't say for how much and no sign of the money yet. If this is a typical end of term performance it does not bode well. Do the shareholders not get a say on whether to sell or not based on the sale price? Bear in mind that this is the first loan completion so we are in uncharted waters. Their rules state that the property will be sold unless 75% vote to keep it. Last Sept lenders in SPV1 lenders were balloted on keep or sell at a price which PM had agreed subject to contract. They strongly recommended selling and an abstention was taken as a vote to sell. AFAIK that sale fell through and they eventually sold it 4 months later at what seems to be a much lower figure. But the whole procedure is very opaque so this may not be right. For SPV2 they intially balloted and <75% voted to keep it, but then they moved the goalposts and had another ballot. They wanted to allow investors who wanted out to get their money back but also allow those who wanted to keep it to do so. In other words they are making it up as they go along making continual improvements. I think it might take a few loans terminating to settle down.
|
|
|
|
Post by sayyestocress on Feb 2, 2017 8:58:36 GMT
Thanks, sounds like a bit of a mess, especially SPV2. I can only hope they've got things sorted by the time my properties come to term, which is quite a way off fortunately!
|
|
kaya
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 718
|
Post by kaya on Feb 2, 2017 11:17:45 GMT
4 months later and they say it has finally sold, but they don't say for how much and no sign of the money yet. If this is a typical end of term performance it does not bode well. This might be a untypically fast performance! I can't see HMO properties with poor rental yield histories exactly flying off the shelves. A possible weakness of the PM set-up is that it might be geared to buying up properties that previous landlords might understandably want rid of. Finding new buyers for some of these properties might be very difficult, or impossible, unless discounted to well below 'market value'. The projected capital gains might turn out to be a hopefull illusion.
|
|
littleoldlady
Member of DD Central
Running down all platforms due to age
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1,862
|
Post by littleoldlady on Feb 2, 2017 19:01:04 GMT
4 months later and they say it has finally sold, but they don't say for how much and no sign of the money yet. If this is a typical end of term performance it does not bode well. This might be a untypically fast performance! I can't see HMO properties with poor rental yield histories exactly flying off the shelves. A possible weakness of the PM set-up is that it might be geared to buying up properties that previous landlords might understandably want rid of. Finding new buyers for some of these properties might be very difficult, or impossible, unless discounted to well below 'market value'. The projected capital gains might turn out to be a hopefull illusion. Yes, investors might be wise to invest for the rental yield and treat any capital gain as a bonus. Unfortunately the headline yield is greatly depressed by PM's costs and void periods etc.
|
|
hazellend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 2,180
|
Post by hazellend on Feb 2, 2017 19:52:11 GMT
This might be a untypically fast performance! I can't see HMO properties with poor rental yield histories exactly flying off the shelves. A possible weakness of the PM set-up is that it might be geared to buying up properties that previous landlords might understandably want rid of. Finding new buyers for some of these properties might be very difficult, or impossible, unless discounted to well below 'market value'. The projected capital gains might turn out to be a hopefull illusion. Yes, investors might be wise to invest for the rental yield and treat any capital gain as a bonus. Unfortunately the headline yield is greatly depressed by PM's costs and void periods etc. Depressed mainly by the very, very long void periods. I can't even understand how properties can remain unrented for so long.
|
|
