|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on May 24, 2014 23:54:00 GMT
style="border:1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);padding:3px;" | Row 1 column 1 | Row 1 column 2 | | Row 2 column 1 | Row 2 column 2 |
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on May 24, 2014 23:59:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jul 15, 2014 10:56:55 GMT
Let the Fight commence! Is Hackney Interest correct? Hi chris, Sorry to bother you at such a busy time but can you get someone in your team to cast an eye over this. I bought some Hackney: note 194974 I've hilited in blue. then I sell Hackney194974: then the deferred interest is paid: I seem to have held 194974 for three months without getting any interest? As for the adjacent Hackney unit: I sold that one on the 9/7/14 at 10.17:49 I guess I'm missing something I just can't see it. Thanks Chris, PS I can't seem to add attachments except in posts so I stuck the is message here. This will get picked up in the review of deferred interest. There was an issue for loan units bought and sold within a repayment period that was in effect in March. I may get to it this week but I still have a lot of other pressures on me with deliverables for the rebuild so it may be next week.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Jul 15, 2014 11:07:09 GMT
This will get picked up in the review of deferred interest. There was an issue for loan units bought and sold within a repayment period that was in effect in March. I may get to it this week but I still have a lot of other pressures on me with deliverables for the rebuild so it may be next week. Yes the buy was in march BUT the sell was in JULY not March. IN EDIT I can see similar effects in April too
|
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jul 15, 2014 11:09:14 GMT
This will get picked up in the review of deferred interest. There was an issue for loan units bought and sold within a repayment period that was in effect in March. I may get to it this week but I still have a lot of other pressures on me with deliverables for the rebuild so it may be next week. Yes the buy was in march BUT the sell was in JULY not March. There's a chain that gets created at point of purchase that was getting broken when it was modified more than once per repayment period. I'll need to look into it as part of the wider review as it's very hard to reverse engineer what happened manually. But it will be included. Edit: thinking about it a bit more I don't think that's what happened. But the review is an automated recalculation of every aftermarket transaction to spot discrepancies. It'll pick up this issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Jul 18, 2014 18:06:46 GMT
The way back to the Original Thread is HEREPlease post there to keep things in one place as much as poss. |
|
|
|
Post by Ton ⓉⓞⓃ on Sept 13, 2016 14:06:43 GMT
|
|
