duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 6,898
|
Post by duck on Jun 27, 2014 7:56:57 GMT
Being based in the UK and investing as an individual I am bound by what many view as 'unfair' tax rules - basically tax on all income, no offsetting of losses. I accept that the chances of this changing are low.
I think all of us who invest with Bondora accept that rates are higher along with higher defaults than most UK P2P and P2B sites.
I monitor all my P2P/P2B investments closely and naturally with Bondora defaults and taxation come highly monitored.
Today when I added in a couple of new defaults one of my graphs produced an 'interesting' result. Based on a running year if I take Interest + late fees and then deduct defaults (capital only at time of default - adjusted as recoveries are made) and taxation (basic rate) the 'cash to me' is for the first time less than the total defaults + taxation i.e over 50% of the interest returned goes elsewhere.
Obviously this is a psychological barrier since I am still content with my return and the platform ............ but I still don't like the graph! Having 'cut my teeth' back in the listings days on Zopa where defaults did hit you in the pocket (no protection fund) I simply found this taxation rule annoying however with Bondora (and its higher default rate) the rule tends to bite harder.
A quick hand calc says I would be far better off if I invested through my limited Co (100% shareholder).
Do other UK based investors notice the same/similar issues? Are those investors not based in the UK faced with similar tax rules?
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jun 28, 2014 4:38:49 GMT
My position is hugely different from the one that you are seeing.
In my case default capital value is €x. Net profit or loss for all loan sales since start of year is about €x/3 loss. Interest and fee income is about €22x over about 18 months before tax. Even if I use higher rate tax that would be very positive using your calculation. My first investment was in November 2012, first repayment in December 2012.
I noticed in a batch of loans that I've been selling because they are more late than I want the interest income has been greater than the discounts I needed to sell the loan. I have not been collecting systematic data but it is entirely possible that after allowing for tax the combined result is that overall the loans that I have sold to avoid default have been net profitable for me. That may also be true if I limit it to only looking at those which I have sold at a discount.
If I include the loans that have gone on to default I think that it is likely that they will also become profitable, or if combined with those sold will overall be profitable. Most are making regular full payments including penalties, although some are making only small payments occasionally.
With this sort of reasoning it is good to see that Bondora has gradually been increasing the average time it takes before loans default. This makes it more likely that for each loan the interest will cover the capital loss if a sale before default is carried out.
My current position for all loans that I have sold since the start of the year is a capital loss of about 0.9% before I allow for interest earned. Many of those loans were sold just because of low interest rates, not default risk. Those low rate sales were often had a small capital loss, though many were sold at a profit. The default risk loans tend to need a higher discount because I now sell later than I used to. Previously I sold relatively early and usually at a profit. It is not yet clear to me whether the extra income from those that I do not sell is sufficient to cover the extra cost of selling some loans later. Nor is it clear to me that the extra time cost of more monitoring of late loans is worthwhile.
I did quite rapidly increase my loan book size while the low bid wins system was working and those loans are so new that most have not yet had time to move to possible default. Amount invested is now about 3-4 times larger than before low bid wins. I do not think that the new loan results will differ sufficiently from older loans to change my overall picture much. Monthly interest payments before tax are currently about three times my total defaulted loan capital value.
Bondora's annualized net return on investment for me varies between 26% and 29% depending on time of month. Currently about 27%. My own 100% loss from default Euro XIRR is about 17.5% and continues to rise by 1-2% a month towards whatever value it settles at. Rank in investors who have more than €10000 invested for more than a year varies in the range between 10 and 40 depending on time of month. Currently 27, or 730 among all investors, Exchange rate variations mean that my Pound XIRR has been falling recently. It's currently about 13%, down from a peak of about 15.5%. Average interest rate is about 25.7%. All before tax.
You limited company can't use an ISA. If you have an ISA available that might be sufficient reason to wait, then move loans into the ISA if you have sufficient past years ISA money available to do it. Assuming that Bondora does support ISA use it will make a huge difference for UK investors.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 6,898
|
Post by duck on Jun 28, 2014 7:38:05 GMT
james thanks for a very informative post.
For information my loan book currently stands at loans to +1200 individuals and Bondora's annualized net return on investment for me varies between 23% and 25%, so I'm not at your level. This has been built up over the past 15 months and approx. 15% are yet to reach the possibility of default.
My default rate has in the last year been dominated by the initial batch of Finnish loans (zero payments made and I additionally made the mistake of investing my 'standard amount' neglecting the additional risk) but this has now levelled out. Whilst I make efforts to sell loans that I think will default I refuse to join the -30% group preferring to take the default and risk recovery - like you recovery appears to be working with only a couple of not traceables. It is these factors that along with the 'running year' that produced the graph made reference to in my initial post.
I note that at month end I have <4% 'lates' and only 3 probable defaults in these, this is certainly encouraging.
I take your point about ISA but if losses (capital defaults) were offset against income as I can with my Ltd Co the tax take would be cut dramatically ......
|
|
JamesFrance
Member of DD Central
Port Grimaud 1974
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 897
|
Post by JamesFrance on Jun 28, 2014 8:31:20 GMT
I see you both talk about defaulters making payments, but in my case only one of mine has paid anything since defaulting. I only started with Bondora 10 months ago, so I am hoping to see some more payments as time goes on. I did get the impression that the collection agency didn't achieve much so I hope that in house collection will be more effective and produce earlier results.
I too was adding money regularly until a month ago, since when I have difficulty using the repayments. I took on selected B+ loans, however I have ceased doing that as 50% of those reaching their first payment date are overdue.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jun 28, 2014 9:56:40 GMT
My loan book is about 900 individuals, not checked exactly. I've done no lending to Finnish, Spanish, Slovak or B+ borrowers.
I expect to receive between £4000 and £6000 of interest this tax year so it will be necessary for me to complete the foreign part of the tax return. That has individual entries for each country from which I receive interest so it is essential that I can report by country. Knowing this and that I might have gone over £2000 last year is part of why I did no lending to those outside Estonia.
I'm not sure that you really have as much of an offsettable capital loss as you think. You do today but as I understand it if you deduct losses now you're going to have to add recoveries later. I think that recoveries may exceed 100% after allowing for interest and penalties so I think that eventually your overall position will cause it not to matter so much. Still unpleasant today, though.
My current lates less than 60 days are higher than yours, about 7.5%. I'll probably succeed in selling those that I think might go on to default. The first to default will be in about ten days if not sold. I've never sold at -30%, at least I think not, none since the start of the year. Here's a summary of the highest discounts I used and what subsequently happened:
-22%: defaulted -18%: defaulted -11%: defaulted -11%: overdue, won't reach default date for another week or two. -10%: defaulted, I sold about 50% of my parts of this loan. -10%: overdue, well past default date, lots owed -10%: defaulted -10%: defaulted
The rest were sold at -9% or better. I seem to be doing a decent job of anticipating possible default and getting the loan sold at a good price before it happens, while retaining those that go on to pay late fees rather than defaulting. Still early days, but I'm clearly beating the old overall Bondora 86% recovery rate in my sales record, though perhaps not the ultimate actual rate, assuming that goes to over 100%.
I've also bought one late loan that remains late and paying penalties. Very limited activity in this area for me but I did consider buying another recently at a high discount, didn't do it. There was the potential in that one to buy then sell at a significantly lower discount.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jun 28, 2014 10:04:16 GMT
jamesfrance, you'll need to allow about two months before there's much sign of repayments and a few months longer before you get to see a more final state where those who can pay are forced to pay using the law. Not always but that's what you should expect.
One of mine who initially defaulted had a bailiff visit and is now no longer classed by Bondora as in default. Instead they have paid in an arrangement and recently increased the arrangement payments so it appears that they will fully repay including all penalties. I sold much of my holding of this loan when it changed from default to non-default state, which cost me money in reduced recovery income but reduced my risk. I don't know whether Bondora still changes state like this, I've only seen it happen once.
Overall I'm quite pleased with the collection results. Not pleased enough not to sell first if I can get a decent price.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 6,898
|
Post by duck on Jun 28, 2014 15:47:20 GMT
I've had 3 repayments from defaulters this week (OK one was only 1c but it all helps) and I have a batch who it is noted have just had/are just about to have a visit from the bailiffs ..... so don't despair jamesfrance as james has said it does take time but does appear to be effective. I anticipate my recovery rate to continue to increase.
Interesting comment james about the 'changing state', I haven't seen that but will keep an eye open for this since I have a fair few loans that could be at this point.
James your sales strategy does appear to be far more aggressive than mine, -10% is the lowest I have gone (a couple of days ago on 2 loans) but usually no lower than -5%, as I said in other posts I fail to find logic in the aftermarket and therefore cannot be certain of getting my pricing correct. I made sales in the past couple of days at 0%, -5% and -10% (still made a profit on the loans) yet I view these loans as certain defaults. One of the -10% remains unsold but that doesn't surprise me. What I still find difficult to deal with are those people that don't make any repayments and go straight to default. I've amassed 15 in the last year which I view far too high so I have recently become more aggressive in selling these loans.
Good point about the future recovery position james, it was exactly for that reason that I haven't opened an account with Bondora with my Ltd Co, my spreadsheets are already 'extensive' and I cannot justify the extra work.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jun 28, 2014 21:23:29 GMT
Like you I pay particular attention to loans where not even the first payment may be made, even more so if the borrower is young and/or may lack assets for a bailiff to seize. I'm a bit more aggressive in discounts than you but given the default rate of those I sold at highest discounts I'm content with the prices.
Aftermarket pricing in part depends on round numbers so that searches will find the loans, in part on competition between sellers and in part on the details of the loan. If I'm really keen to sell I try to ensure that I go beyond the various 5% boundaries in return to buyer number. 30.1% is more likely to sell than 29.9% because more searches will find it, even though those have to be done by a human scanning the loans rather than by an explicit search.
|
|
duck
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 6,898
|
Post by duck on Oct 18, 2014 10:43:28 GMT
Today is a day of trawling through my Company and Personal tax calculations before submission to HMRC. I note my accountants agree with my interpretation of HMRC rules (and my own personal communications with HMRC) - Transferwise charges and Bondora 'fees' have been deducted from my overall 'profit'.
I know there was some debate on this subject ............... but I can't find the thread/post so I have added this note here for info.
|
|
nick
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 825
|
Post by nick on Sept 3, 2015 18:49:47 GMT
I've just started pulling together data for my 2015 UK SA tax submission. I have looked at HMRC's guidance regarding making CGT loss relief claim in respect of losses on loans, but the losses that are allowed to be claimed seem to be limited and exclude loans that are not made to a trade or to borrower outside the UK. This restriction would appear to prevent UK investors from making any CGT loss relief claims on bad loans (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323727/hs296.pdf).
Has anyone researched CGT loss relief this or obtained specific advice on the matter?
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Sept 3, 2015 19:32:34 GMT
I did some research and concluded that it is not applicable to individuals so I made no deduction on my tax return.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Sept 6, 2015 15:44:29 GMT
I've just started pulling together data for my 2015 UK SA tax submission. I have looked at HMRC's guidance regarding making CGT loss relief claim in respect of losses on loans, but the losses that are allowed to be claimed seem to be limited and exclude loans that are not made to a trade or to borrower outside the UK. This restriction would appear to prevent UK investors from making any CGT loss relief claims on bad loans (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323727/hs296.pdf). Has anyone researched CGT loss relief this or obtained specific advice on the matter? If you are lending as an individual (not through a company) you have looked in the right place and your understanding is correct. Under the current rules, there is no relief of any kind for losses on loans to overseas borrowers.
|
|
nick
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 825
|
Post by nick on Sept 9, 2015 13:24:10 GMT
I've just started pulling together data for my 2015 UK SA tax submission. I have looked at HMRC's guidance regarding making CGT loss relief claim in respect of losses on loans, but the losses that are allowed to be claimed seem to be limited and exclude loans that are not made to a trade or to borrower outside the UK. This restriction would appear to prevent UK investors from making any CGT loss relief claims on bad loans (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323727/hs296.pdf). Has anyone researched CGT loss relief this or obtained specific advice on the matter? If you are lending as an individual (not through a company) you have looked in the right place and your understanding is correct. Under the current rules, there is no relief of any kind for losses on loans to overseas borrowers. What interested me was the restriction regarding the purpose of the loan, only losses on loans made in respect to a trade (which thus exclude general loans made to individuals) can attract CGT relief. The restriction on foreign losses is more obvious and expected.
|
|
pikestaff
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,187
Likes: 1,546
|
Post by pikestaff on Sept 9, 2015 17:15:52 GMT
...What interested me was the restriction regarding the purpose of the loan, only losses on loans made in respect to a trade (which thus exclude general loans made to individuals) can attract CGT relief. The restriction on foreign losses is more obvious and expected. Indeed. It's also worth noting that the trade must not consist of or include the lending of money. It will be interesting to see to what extent these restrictions will be repeated in the new loss relief against income, for which we should see draft legislation later this year.
|
|
stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Nov 26, 2015 8:20:52 GMT
I've just started pulling together data for my 2015 UK SA tax submission. I have looked at HMRC's guidance regarding making CGT loss relief claim in respect of losses on loans, but the losses that are allowed to be claimed seem to be limited and exclude loans that are not made to a trade or to borrower outside the UK. This restriction would appear to prevent UK investors from making any CGT loss relief claims on bad loans (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323727/hs296.pdf). Has anyone researched CGT loss relief this or obtained specific advice on the matter? If you are lending as an individual (not through a company) you have looked in the right place and your understanding is correct. Under the current rules, there is no relief of any kind for losses on loans to overseas borrowers. So if your company was lending, you could claim a loss?
|
|