|
Post by stuartassetzcapital on Sept 15, 2017 17:15:47 GMT
I actually find this quite disturbing. I've done some very rudimentary analysis of thse 2 by looking at transaction history over the last 6 months. The loan that is 17.x % of my GBBA does not have any recent purchase transaction, but does have some capital repayment. There is close to zero of this loan currently available. I can't help but come to the conclusion that likely at some point I held closer to the 20%, and the needle just got 'stuck'. The other one which is only a shade under 20% does have recent purchase transactions, including today (bless it). There is <0.01 pence available on the market, presumably because my account keeps mopping it up ! To be fair this is a large loan, but nonetheless something seems horribly wrong if after a lengthy period close to 40% of my account is in two flaming loans. If I'd been holding substantially more in this account I would be horrified. Even as it is, I'm unchuffed. In excess of 50% of my GBBA is in just 4 loans. Diversifcation across 70 loans is pretty meaningless in this context. It would be better to think of this in terms of 50% of the value of my GBBA has no meaningful diversification, and 50% is diversified. (well that is how my mind works). I don't recall making a major deposit to the GBBA in recent times. EDIT: t/his post had a long gestation period, and therefore was not intended as reply to either the Capt.s or the other Capts posts Yes the rewrite will improve the diversification you have substantially and in addition all known and expected losses on the loans in the account are more than well covered by the PF.
|
|