archie
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 1,842
|
Post by archie on Aug 16, 2017 9:03:34 GMT
Bid limit should be £75 not £25, it's impossible to invest more.
|
|
DiQ
Member of DD Central
Posts: 61
Likes: 48
|
Post by DiQ on Aug 16, 2017 9:06:17 GMT
Somebody's going to be in trouble today
|
|
hantsowl
Member of DD Central
Posts: 672
Likes: 546
|
Post by hantsowl on Aug 16, 2017 9:09:09 GMT
Yes, unable to bid the extra £25 from 10:00am because bid limit still £25. Collateral Rep
|
|
DeafEater
Member of DD Central
Extremely Moderate
Posts: 218
Likes: 292
|
Post by DeafEater on Aug 16, 2017 9:09:54 GMT
I was confused by the screen when I prefunded 50 but when it accepted my offer, I assumed I'd misunderstood the wording. My maximum possible bid of -25 this morning shows I didn't misunderstand it. Collateral Rep!
|
|
mrflush
Member of DD Central
This is not me
Posts: 98
Likes: 40
|
Post by mrflush on Aug 16, 2017 9:12:35 GMT
There are three successive investments of £25 showing by M ******** H so maybe there was a way to trick the validation. Seems a bit of a coincidence if they are different people.
|
|
sirius
Member of DD Central
Posts: 161
Likes: 141
|
Post by sirius on Aug 16, 2017 9:16:30 GMT
Maybe they did not pre-fund and so were within the £25 limit?
|
|
n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 879
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Aug 16, 2017 9:19:23 GMT
There are three successive investments of £25 showing by M ******** H so maybe there was a way to trick the validation. Seems a bit of a coincidence if they are different people. One of those H's is a C
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Aug 16, 2017 9:23:05 GMT
There are three successive investments of £25 showing by M ******** H so maybe there was a way to trick the validation. Seems a bit of a coincidence if they are different people. One of those H's is a C You can't see the one below the (current) bottom of the list now. Come on Gordon. Finish that coffee!! collateral
|
|
stub8535
Member of DD Central
personal opinions only. Not qualified to advise on investment products.
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 945
Member is Online
|
Post by stub8535 on Aug 16, 2017 9:23:30 GMT
I tried to query the statement on the loan that the £25 included pre funding at just past 09:30 this morning. Nobody was picking up in the office. Asked for callback. Nothing yet. Not the usual standard of comms I have come to expect from col.
|
|
oldgrumpy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,087
Likes: 3,233
|
Post by oldgrumpy on Aug 16, 2017 9:26:51 GMT
I tried to query the statement on the loan that the £25 included pre funding at just past 09:30 this morning. Nobody was picking up in the office. Asked for callback. Nothing yet. Not the usual standard of comms I have come to expect from col. I thought that was confusing yesterday, and managed my £50 prefund by two £25 bids.
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 3,136
|
Post by jonno on Aug 16, 2017 9:27:47 GMT
I tried to query the statement on the loan that the £25 included pre funding at just past 09:30 this morning. Nobody was picking up in the office. Asked for callback. Nothing yet. Not the usual standard of comms I have come to expect from col. Agreed, but really, let's not get too wound up over 25 quid
|
|
stub8535
Member of DD Central
personal opinions only. Not qualified to advise on investment products.
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 945
Member is Online
|
Post by stub8535 on Aug 16, 2017 9:30:00 GMT
I tried to query the statement on the loan that the £25 included pre funding at just past 09:30 this morning. Nobody was picking up in the office. Asked for callback. Nothing yet. Not the usual standard of comms I have come to expect from col. Agreed, but really, let's not get too wound up over 25 quid £25 is not the issue. It is a change in pre funding operation. More important is considering pre funding property tranches hence the need for clarrification about why coding has changed on this first bling in months.
|
|
jonno
Member of DD Central
nil satis nisi optimum
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 3,136
|
Post by jonno on Aug 16, 2017 9:33:47 GMT
Agreed, but really, let's not get too wound up over 25 quid £25 is not the issue. It is a change in pre funding operation. More important is considering pre funding property tranches hence the need for clarrification about why coding has changed on this first bling in months. I'm not convinced it is a change in pre funding operation; more likely a straight forward cock-up. My point was that Gordon will no doubt explain in due course and over £25 we should just wait for his response.
|
|
DeafEater
Member of DD Central
Extremely Moderate
Posts: 218
Likes: 292
|
Post by DeafEater on Aug 16, 2017 9:37:01 GMT
£25 is not the issue. It is a change in pre funding operation. More important is considering pre funding property tranches hence the need for clarrification about why coding has changed on this first bling in months. It's clearly not a coding issue, it's a cock-up. You can't have a prefund limit of £50 but a total of £25 for the first 3 hours after the loan start. It doesn't make sense.
The coding obviously doesn't bother to check the funding limit when accepting prefund amounts or it would have blown a raspberry yesterday. Probably the coding for the back office application that let's them set these thresholds ought to prevent them setting the total limit at less than the prefund limit, but that's another issue.
|
|
sg
Posts: 68
Likes: 69
|
Post by sg on Aug 16, 2017 9:43:09 GMT
I thought the email was fairly clear
1) 5 Piece Jewellery Loan Interest P/A - 10% Loan value of £33,100 (value £93,985) LTV 35.22% Loan Term - 6 months Pre Fund - £50 Bid Limit - £25 (total £75)
So £50 yesterday, another £25 today, total £75 as stated.
Except, of course, it won't let me have todays £25.
That's got to be a coding problem - stating there's a bid limit of -£25 makes no sense anyway you look at it.
|
|