happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 12, 2017 11:51:54 GMT
valerieb has a good point. I read this site nearly every day following the p2p threads I am interested in (5), however I only ever log in if I want to comment, like today, so counting the times I have logged in would give no indication at all of my use of the site. Incidentally I take this opportunity to thank all those very diligent contributors who have helped me to make my lending decisions. Sorry if I messed up the quotes. We didn't even have phones when I was born!
We didn't either, then we moved into a new house when I was about six and a telephone, as I believe it was called in those days, was installed in the hall but it wasn't connected. It took my dad about 2 years to decide he could afford the rental contract but he finally took the plunge. Imagine our excitement when the day eventually arrived for the GPO (that's General Post Office for you youngsters) to come and connect our phone, we were so looking forward to ringing up our friends to tell them that we had a telephone, not that we knew any of their numbers mind. With the phone successfully connected we waited patiently for Father to arrive home and show us how to use it. He came home, walked up to the phone, took a small metal thing out of his pocket and attached it to the front of the phone. He said "that's to stop you lot using it, it costs too much money".............it was a lock! And my teenage daughter complains that she still has an iPhone 5...........oh for goodness sake!
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 11, 2017 13:33:37 GMT
#280 W****** Hotel This nice little traditional hostelry has just repaid. Another successful loan for everyone. (Jeez, beginning to sound like GeorgeT ) Bugger! That's another £500 or so looking for a new home. Most of the time I really hate early repayments, like P*** & Co and the Potato loan, I really liked those 2 for some reason.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 11, 2017 10:23:11 GMT
Response fron AC CS today:
The loans you have highlighted have now all had loan units listed for sale. The process for releasing loan units into the MLIA and other investment accounts is manual, it appears a step was missed here. I’d like to apologise for the delay. I hope this email has answered your enquiry but if you have any further questions please do not hesitate to get in touch.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 11, 2017 6:24:40 GMT
£1.58? Farcical really. Don't know why AC even bother to ask us to set buying instructions for these loans. Maybe they could tell us beforehand to transfer <£5 because the allocation will in all likelihood be lower. I won't contact customer services with the suggestion. AC should be able to work all this out for themselves. This didn't make your day then! Personally if the loan is small, looks ok and has a half decent rate I only expect a small allocation on AC now. Anything under £50k unlikely to get more than £25 allocation, £100k around £50. If the rate is lower you can probably double that most times but typically not much more unless the loan is not so attractive. Worth keeping a small buy order on these smaller more desirable loans though as I do seem to pick up a reasonable number of buys in the weeks and months after drawdown. It goes some way to alleviating the initial disappointments.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 20:31:11 GMT
One for customer services I'm afraid, it's not a system error but a case of someone not yet pushing the button to release the funds. If in doubt always best to talk to the service desk as they can then contact the appropriate person internally. OK thanks Chris, #552 in the same state as well, drew down 2nd October, in the QAA but nothing in the MLIA, I will ping CS and report back. Not had anything back on my mail to AC CS but mysteriously only a few hours after my email to them #552 and #545 that had both been stuck in the QAA seem to have been allocated. #549 looks like it has done similarly as there is <£0.00 showing now rather than the previous £0.00. I wasn't in that loan as have enough of the first loan so don't know what the allocation was. hope you got some clay
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 11:14:10 GMT
How does one go about joining these private P2P forum(s)? Competition can be good Wait to be invited, i think
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 10:07:57 GMT
I don't see much whinging merlin but I do see a lots of posters expressing the view that perhaps this did not need to happen this way and it is perhaps not in the best interests of the future of this forum or its members. A secret forum is perhaps not a good way to describe it, it is more a hidden forum as unlike the P2PIF I cannot search the internet and find it like we probably all did to get here in the first place. I am sure The 60 have no sinister motives, they are all part of this group probably because they share the common desire and objective to simplify their interactions and maximise their opportunities in P2P et al unencumbered by what they see as overly restrictrive rules. It's just a shame it happened this way and that communication appears to have stopped, that's all
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 9:14:10 GMT
So far I have not seen a single post from a member of The 60 publicly revealing their membership of the new forum and explaining the reasons for them taking their chosen path and how or even if they are planning to share any of their discoveries with this forum. This simpy magnifies the perceived secret nature of this new forum and increases suspicion as to the motives, probably quite wrongly. You're not reading these posts thoroughly then: Oct 8, 2017 at 10:51am fasty, xell, and 7 more like this Quote Post Options Post by chielamangus on Oct 8, 2017 at 10:51am I am a member of another (non-public) P2P forum, though whether it is the one the mods here are referring to, I have no idea. It is not a secret society, a cabal, or anything furtive or mysterious - it just discusses P2P stuff without any of the restrictions that this forum places on users. The starting post for this thread bespeaks of paranoia and suspicion - the reasons why I no longer post much here and why I value a place with freedom of expression. As far as I am concerned there is space for multiple fora, private and public. ....I stand corrected, to some degree, as your caveats about this maybe or maybe not being the forum in question still leaves an element of doubt and intrigue. To be clear on the subject I have absolutely no issue with what you say about wanting a place where you have freedom of expression and I have no desire to want to stop you or even join your group. It is just a shame it has to happen somewhere where I or any interested forum members cannot even apply to join should we so desire. It seems from the outside that this new forum was created in secrecy with a carefully chosen membership and but for the mods making us aware of it's existence we would all be none the wiser, which in hindsight would perhaps be for the better in some respects. IMHO here hangs the reason for the "secret society" emotions you see posted. Not sure if you could have done it differently TBH as I am obviously not privy to the details of it's gestation but from the outside, now we know of it's existence, it just feels a bit secret, exclusive and somehow a little bit wrong. I hope you understand and appreciate this viewpoint.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 7:18:56 GMT
I am not sure this forum has lost the "60" - to my knowledge, they still post here. I have to agree with chielamangus . I don't see why members of the Secret 60 wouldn't continue to post here. I can see why they might have decided to set up a separate space where they could share DD without having to use *******s and not risk the nasty things that the rules on this public forum are designed to avoid. But once they've done the work and gathered their thoughts on a particular loan or platform, why wouldn't they want to share it here? In the past there have been cases where a platform wanted to do something but were persuaded that it wasn't a good idea and changed their mind. ISTM that sort of influence is what the Secret 60 would want to continue to have, and they can't influence platforms if there's no open line of communication. There has to be a potential for collusion and market manipulation, but I don't know why that's any more likely among the Secret 60 than it might be here by someone with an axe to grind posting Fake News. I think the great majority of the people on here are here because they want to be helpful and to learn from others. From comments made by moderators in this thread, those are similar motivations for those who give freely of their time to keep this forum safe and useful, and I'm very grateful to them for that. I would expect the Secret 60 to have similar motivation. And even if there were to be some of them who would like to try release, or withhold, info for an ulterior motive, I'd expect there would be others who wouldn't agree to such tactics and leaks to this forum would spring up. In short, I really don't see the other forum as a threat to this one, and I don't see why the two fora can't coexist peacefully. But that's JMHO. I hoped this would be the case and that one of The 60 would post here to allay our quite legitimate fears (in the absence of any statement from them) over the veil of secrecy that could be drawn over their actions. I agree The 60 can and probably still do post here but quite naturally the bulk of the valuable contribution they made is most likely going to be happening elsewhere going forward. So far I have not seen a single post from a member of The 60 publicly revealing their membership of the new forum and explaining the reasons for them taking their chosen path and how or even if they are planning to share any of their discoveries with this forum. This simpy magnifies the perceived secret nature of this new forum and increases suspicion as to the motives, probably quite wrongly. I get the impression that discussions with the Mods regarding any solution or compromise over this situation have reached an impasse so unfortunately the die appears to have been cast. This leaves us all to draw our own, potentially quite wrong conclusions from the little information we have available to us. Such a shame really! ..........time for another coffee..
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 6:03:26 GMT
Looks like #545 is in a similar stuck state with holdings picked up in the QAA/30 Day but nothing feeding through to the MLIA. This loan drew down on the 2nd October so setting a new record in slow distribution to the MLIA by my reckoning. Please feed the hamsters chris One for customer services I'm afraid, it's not a system error but a case of someone not yet pushing the button to release the funds. If in doubt always best to talk to the service desk as they can then contact the appropriate person internally. OK thanks Chris, #552 in the same state as well, drew down 2nd October, in the QAA but nothing in the MLIA, I will ping CS and report back.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 10, 2017 5:54:51 GMT
Looks like #545 is in a similar stuck state with holdings picked up in the QAA/30 Day but nothing feeding through to the MLIA. This loan drew down on the 2nd October so setting a new record in slow distribution to the MLIA by my reckoning. Please feed the hamsters chris
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Oct 9, 2017 7:07:09 GMT
Reading this thread is really saddening. My journey in P2P over the last 3 years has been helped and guided enormously by the contributors to this forum. I thank them for what they do to make P2P a more rewarding and ultimately safer place for us all to invest in.
Many of us with reasonable experience of this forum could probably name a fairly large percentage of "The 60", their lack of participation here over recent weeks speaks for itself (I knew something was up even before this announcement to be honest) and I know these posters have been a significant part of the value this forum offered.
The current situation benefits nobody except the platforms who in the main must be absolutely delighted with this development, I can think of many a loan that did not make the light of day but for open, public DD done here in plain sight of all. A potentially multi-million pound field that might (or might not) have become a graveyard at about 6x the going rate for burial plots instantly springs to mind.
IMHO the real strength of this forum is threefold: 1. it provides a forum for us to communicate, share, learn and develop our P2P knowledge across the diverse area of P2P lending.
2. it provides us with the ability to influence the platforms, and not just those that choose to publicly acknowledge that they visit here (they all do I'm sure). This public DD makes P2P safer for everyone, DD in private helps only those who are part of the club dodge the bullets, it does not help reduce the wider systemic risk of platforms firing off dodgy deals with inadequate DD to unsuspecting investors.
3. Most importantly it allows new p2p investors to find this forum in the first place, to read, learn, gain confidence, join and ultimately participate. Each new member bringing their unique skills and experience and adding to its collective strength. It is after all the place that brought the "The 60" together. A secret, closed forum could never achieve this.
The loss of "The 60" is certainly not to be welcomed but I thank them again for all that they contributed to my journey. However, it surely does not have to mean the end of this forum. Being open to all is its strength and perhaps with some changes to address the issue raised by the departure of "The 60" it will widen its appeal and continue to grow in a way that a secret forum will never be able to do.
Thank you to the forum mods, never had an issue with what you do, I actually think you cut some posters more slack than I would have done in the past, especially WRT platform bashing.
I'm not sure this whole issue is about mod control, maybe it is about wanting freedom and independence to do their own thing their own way. If that is the case then so be it, we all loose!
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Sept 28, 2017 18:22:06 GMT
Yeah, I saw 5.1% in the 1 year. A years a long time though and I'm trying to move all my funds to quicker fee free access in case I move house in the next year. Might just have to settle for varying rates in rolling over the short term. Most of my cash is still tied in to RS 5 year and Zopa Plus so just need to use more quicker access accounts. For the first time in years I'm even starting to put a bit in to Premium Bonds as despite the derisory rate it's secure, tax free and quick access. Will get me below inflation returns but will be for less than a year. Look on the bright side Brian (he said resisting the obvious Monty Python film pun there), you could be a millionaire winner before you move house, perhaps go for a bigger house then hey!
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Sept 25, 2017 6:43:20 GMT
One of the reasons I ran this poll was to see if anyone here would opt for "conservative". My hunch would be that there is probably better value in the conservative option, but that hunch doesn't really stand up to much scrutiny. How some of the loans get rated as A/A+ has constantly surprised me, at least based on the accounts presented. Sometimes the accounts look blatantly wrong and autobid mops them up before FC bother to lift a finger. I have to say I've struggled to make much sense of FC's rating system - and I say that as someone who once upon a time could explain where Moody's methodology differed from S&P's. However, it may all make a little more sense if your credit process gives significant weight to Directors' guarantees. We don't get to see the quality of the PG, and given this is mostly unsecured lending the financial reserves of a company sponsor do make a difference - and it would chime with FC's head of risk coming from a consumer credit background (credit cards, as opposed to corporate lending or bonds). What will be interesting to see is how FC manages the relative demand for the conservative and balanced options. To generate 7.5% for the balanced they need a certain proportion of lenders to buy the conservative option. Demand for the two options is not necessarily going to match the existing loan book, and this is where it gets interesting. FC can either vary the rates offered to align demand with supply (e.g. offer a higher rate to tempt more into conservative), or they can skew their credit ratings to make the loan book fit the investor demand (start rating weaker A rated loans as Bs). Either way there is going to be a transfer of value in risk/reward terms between investors in the two options. Over time they can probably steer their loan origination to match demand more closely, but that will take time... As someone who remembers the good old days of proper FC variable rate auctions I watched with horror as the distribution of A+ to E loans changed beyond recognition when fixed rates auctions arrived and lenders didn't set the rates anymore. Suddenly slam dunk B, C, D & even E loans were coming in at A+ and were happily mopped up by Autobid with no issues. So I would not put it past FC to do whatever it takes to make the numbers work for them especially as they are effectively working in the dark now we have the "New Lending Experience" with us, or whatever they called it! I'm on the Long Road Out of Eden FC, about 6 years I estimate before my repaying defaults finally clear their debts.
|
|
happy
Member of DD Central
Posts: 397
Likes: 497
|
Post by happy on Sept 25, 2017 6:20:16 GMT
It's important to step back from numbers and think about the stories involved. If you're building up a loan book of people borrowing money from non-mainstream sources to pay for their wedding, a new car, a holiday or a new kitchen, is it really surprising that some of them aren't wonderful at paying you back? This platform looks fine from the point of view of abstract numbers, but once you realise you're sending your savings out into the world to become other people's spending, well I think it looks pretty frightening. The idea of savings is that you park your money in the bank and they lend it out to businesses investing in plant and equipment that'll generate an income, not that they give it to some guy to pay for a trip to Greece! Which is exactly why I always thought Plus was a bad idea. It is a lottery what u get given, likewise with all new products since the PF has been abandoned. No choice of who I lend to + No PF to even out the effect of defaults = No investment from Happy Why should I run the risk of massive defaults on my loan book for doing exactly the same as the other guy/gal when he/she gets away with a nice return 'cos he's lucky! At the rates on offer here I'm much happier putting £50k in Premium Bonds, at least there is only the chance I can win a million without any risk of capital and about a 1.5% average return
|
|