ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
MoneyThing (MT) in Administration
MTAU712
May 17, 2017 21:16:59 GMT
Post by ali on May 17, 2017 21:16:59 GMT
MoneyThing : Thanks for the VR which I've just had a quick read through. I'm concerned about the boundary question that VR raises in the site section (pages 6 and 7). Is that something you have been able to clarify? ISTM Its because they have asked the council to make that on-street parking as part of the application so althought the development is within the ownership boundaries they have to include that bit of road in the application boundaries. In the decision notice for the rfused application they were expected to pay £2000 contribution to the redisignation of the footpaths & highway. it would be for general use, not specifically for residents of the block. Thanks ilmoro. You've clearly got a better understanding of this than I have yet. But as I understand it, the planning application includes work done outside the ownership boundary. Specifically, resurfacing of part of the highway with porous paving. My concern is that the council originally refused the application and it was only passed by appeal to some higher authority. Would it be possible for one part of the council to refuse permission to do the work on the highway and another to say that the conditions of the planning application weren't met. I've met this kind of double speak from councils before!
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
MoneyThing (MT) in Administration
MTAU712
May 17, 2017 18:22:35 GMT
Post by ali on May 17, 2017 18:22:35 GMT
MoneyThing: Thanks for the VR which I've just had a quick read through. I'm concerned about the boundary question that VR raises in the site section (pages 6 and 7). Is that something you have been able to clarify?
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
MoneyThing (MT) in Administration
MTAU712
May 17, 2017 15:38:50 GMT
Post by ali on May 17, 2017 15:38:50 GMT
Hi Ed, Is it a case of the valuation having been done but is still being typed up? Have you been made aware of the contents in some detail? We have seen the full report, it just needed to be readdressed to MoneyThing (Security Trustee) Limited. Regards, Ed. I have chosen not to invest in this loan today, but I am planning to do so tomorrow if the VR looks good. If you don't get the readdressed VR in today would it be possible to publish the un-readdressed one (with redactions if needed) so that I can study it overnight and make a decision?
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on May 13, 2017 18:42:20 GMT
Mrs ali was in Whitehaven today (2017-05-13) and very kindly took these for me. Clearly work hasn't started yet: I thought the seagull was a nice touch
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on May 8, 2017 9:18:28 GMT
Thanks a lot for the photos. To be honest I don't see any easy to spot differences from the previous photo. Yeah. I'm reasonably sure that somebody has been on site, but I agree no actual progress has been made.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on May 8, 2017 6:51:14 GMT
Some evidence of work being done yesterday (2017-05-07), but not a huge amount of progress as yet:
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 28, 2017 19:47:26 GMT
i have so little in FS, and most of it already in belly up loans, that I had taken little notice of this thread. Now I see I am holding tranche 5 of a property in Whitehaven !! NO doubt I was suckered in by the optimistic report that went with tranche 5 I see above people mentioning FS update on this loan. How has this been communicated ?? I see nothing under Updates on Tranche 5 and I do not seem to have had any email. Try loan updates on the 4th tranche (2754713515).
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 20, 2017 19:51:27 GMT
I was in Peterborough today (2017-04-20) and took some pictures of the security for this loan. Looks like no change since the valuation was done last year:
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 12, 2017 21:16:49 GMT
We don't even know what is the state of the property. It's not going to be much comfort, but I've posted a photo of the site here.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 12, 2017 21:13:33 GMT
I was in Whitehaven again today (2017-04-12), so I took another look at this site: fundingsecure might want to compare this photo with what the borrower is telling them.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 10, 2017 12:45:24 GMT
The London Gazette records a petition to wind the company up in February by HMRC, but also that this petition was dismissed on 22nd March 2017.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Apr 9, 2017 13:35:25 GMT
Interestingly I've just logged in to Lendy and noticed their setup is similar however I never make that mistake there so am convinced it is somehow the design of the button on MT that doesn't attract my attention in the same way as the one on the top right of the screen. I've don't think I've ever been confused by MT, but Lendy catches me out occasionally and ABL catches me out almost every day. For me, it's the similarity of the buttons on Lendy and ABL that I find confusing whereas the buttons on MT are so different it's never a problem.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
MoneyThing (MT) in Administration
MTAF
Mar 24, 2017 18:11:01 GMT
david42 likes this
Post by ali on Mar 24, 2017 18:11:01 GMT
I see that the site is saying that 3 MTAF haven't drawn down yet. Does that mean that interest isn't accruing on these loans?
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Mar 24, 2017 17:33:00 GMT
Please let me know if you identify anything else. I used to be able to use Ctrl-minus on the loans page to reduce the size of the text without affecting the column widths so that I could see more loans without needing to scroll. Now Ctrl-minus also shrinks the column widths this is much less effective.
|
|
ali
Member of DD Central
Posts: 313
Likes: 311
|
Post by ali on Mar 19, 2017 15:21:35 GMT
Ok I'm abit confused after reading some posts regarding interest on loan parts for sale. Do I need to cancel sale at 11:59 and put back for sale at 12:01 in order to get the interest? That will always get you the interest, yes. Some other scenarios: If you put a loan part up for sale on the 1st, cancel it at 23:59 on the 3rd, and relist it at 00:01 on the 4th, you get all the interest back. If you put a loan part up for sale on the 28th, cancel it at 00:01 on the 3rd, and relist it at 00:01 on the 4th, you lose the interest in the first month but get all the interest in the second month back. One thing I am not sure of, having never pushed it, is whether you can cancel a sale at 00:01 on the 1st (ie., before the interest run) and get all the interest in the first month back.
|
|