Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 23:13:48 GMT
Where is the line drawn for a repayment being described in the logs as having been late? Some seem to be written up that way and others just appear as green ticks.
This is fairly important information when considering the reliability of a firm. Is it to do with the source of the lateness? (ie. if an explanation is given and is found to be legitimate, it doesn't count as "late"?)
What about "bad debt"? I note that neither of the two liquidated/bankrupt companies appear under "bad debt": in fact without dipping into the discussions tab it's hard to tell that they're anything other than ordinary loans.
It's not of overwhelming importance to change these features, since nothing should hinge on them: the figures and discussions are much more important.
This is fairly important information when considering the reliability of a firm. Is it to do with the source of the lateness? (ie. if an explanation is given and is found to be legitimate, it doesn't count as "late"?)
What about "bad debt"? I note that neither of the two liquidated/bankrupt companies appear under "bad debt": in fact without dipping into the discussions tab it's hard to tell that they're anything other than ordinary loans.
It's not of overwhelming importance to change these features, since nothing should hinge on them: the figures and discussions are much more important.