|
Post by norfolkblue on Apr 19, 2015 16:48:39 GMT
I'm use Funding Circle but I'm looking to spread my p2p portfolio a little better. Just wondered whether people felt there was a difference in borrower profile between the 2 (or against other popular p2b providers).
The reason I ask is because the interest rates are much higher AND the borrower are charged more fees. If this is the case, I struggle to see why the borrower would use the system if they were creditworthy to secure finance elsewhere?
Any thoughts appreciated
|
|
david42
Member of DD Central
Posts: 419
Likes: 346
|
Post by david42 on Apr 19, 2015 18:25:54 GMT
I also have observed that rates on Rebuilding Society seem to be higher for a given level of risk than on Funding Circle. I have three observations from reading some of the loan discussions that might explain this 1) A high proportion of Rebuilding Society loans have worrying aspects, like a previous bankruptcy, that might have caused other platforms to reject them. 2) Apparently Funding Circle have quite rigid pre-qualification criteria that some borrowers might not meet. Rebuilding Society seems to be more flexible. 3) It may be difficult for a borrower to work out which platform is likely to provide the lowest rate. The estimation of how much a loan will cost the borrower on a particular platform is not easy as it depends how the rate will settle in the auction. While we can build up that knowledge by lending on a lot of loans on multiple platforms, a borrower wants just one loan and is unlikely to want to spend as long as we spend comparing the platforms.
|
|