webwiz
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 210
|
Post by webwiz on May 26, 2015 14:20:12 GMT
Zopa and other platforms rewarded early investors who helped spread the word. One way MT could do this is to create an auto-reinvest facility, leave it open for a week or two then remove it. Anyone else support this idea?
|
|
|
Post by MoneyThing on May 26, 2015 14:28:50 GMT
Zopa and other platforms rewarded early investors who helped spread the word. One way MT could do this is to create an auto-reinvest facility, leave it open for a week or two then remove it. Anyone else support this idea? Hi webwiz, Could I ask you to elaborate a bit further on the mechanics of your suggestion? Many thanks, Ed
|
|
webwiz
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 210
|
Post by webwiz on May 26, 2015 17:42:02 GMT
There are various options in how you could use this idea to provide some reward for early investors who spread the word (foolishly, as it turns out, as the platform has become so popular!) at no cost to MT apart from some programming.
You could provide a facility whereby current investors, or maybe early investors, could, if they wish, ask for interest received to be re-invested as soon as possible. (This assumes that you stay with the same model as present, 12% pa for 6 month loans). When a new loan becomes available, before it is open for investment in the normal way the system would check to see which investors who had chosen this option had cash in their account and allocate it it to the loan, maybe adhering to the bid limit if any. If the option is so popular that there may be more cash available than the amount of the loan then some form of rationing will be required. For example: Call the Loan amount L and the number opted in N. Divide L by N, call the result A. Now total the spare cash of these investors whose spare cash holding is less than A, call the number B and the total C, and allocate all the spare cash of these investors to the loan. Now iterate: Divide L-C by N-B etc. If this is too complicated then only consider those accounts where the spare cash is more than the bid limit and allocate the bid limit or, if necessary, a fraction of it to the loan. This may mean that someone who has less than the bid limit but more than the figure arrived at, misses out, but I think it's acceptable.
If you made the option available to all current investors you could remove the sign-up option once everyone had a chance to opt in. If, as I would prefer, you restricted the facility to investors who had joined before some specified date, then the display of the option would only be shown to those investors. In either case a method of opting out would have to be displayed only to those opted in.
This option would not be attractive to everyone. Some people will want to micro manage their investments, but it will suit those many of us and will minimise the time when our funds are not earning.
|
|
rogerbu
Member of DD Central
Posts: 398
Likes: 213
|
Post by rogerbu on May 26, 2015 18:33:57 GMT
Any secret perks (e.g. you restricted the facility to investors who had joined before some specified date) risks seriously pxxxing off the disadvantaged good customers.
It is important to be seen to be fair to all investors.
|
|
webwiz
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 210
|
Post by webwiz on May 26, 2015 21:20:06 GMT
Zopa make no secret of the fact that they charge early investors half of that for those joining after a certain date. Did not seem to do them any harm. I don't object to paying twice as much. Early investors arguably take on more risk than those who wait for the platform to get solidly established. Most people understand this. Maybe you have a point about it being secret, perhaps it should be made clear to everyone.
|
|
|
Post by jprmusicman on Jun 2, 2015 17:47:16 GMT
I for one would really appreciate a feature like this. Due to travel I can rarely get on at the optimum time to invest. My contribution would new much higher if there was a more automated system, as there's no bidding on rates, it wouldn't have a negative effect like on some other sites. Just my opinion. ? James.
|
|
jonah
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 1,113
|
Post by jonah on Jun 2, 2015 19:36:58 GMT
The change outlined above would fundamentally alter the platform. Arguably for the better, but if this was restricted to only a subset of lenders their ability to 'lockout' other people might be an issue.
Speaking personally, I suspect I could never win a 'fastest fingers first' loan due to being otherwise engaged, so this would actually make this platform more attractive to me.
|
|