james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 20, 2015 20:04:05 GMT
MoneyThing appears to have a strong interest in responding to the consultation on deduction of of tax from P2P interest because one proposal is to remove one of MoneyThing's competitive advantages, the lack of an obligation to deduct income tax before paying interest, because loans at MoneyThing are generally or always for less than 12 months- short interest. This appears to inhibit competition between platforms in the sector. " 49. The government is therefore considering whether for P2P loans the obligation to deduct tax is no longer linked to the duration of the loan and should apply equally to both yearly interest and short interest"
|
|
coop
Member of DD Central
Posts: 714
Likes: 571
|
Post by coop on Jul 21, 2015 10:04:16 GMT
No P2P firms I use deduct tax before paying me interest; so don't really see how this is a competitive advantage for MT.
I like it that way to be honest I would rather be culpable for any errors I make than having to answer to HMRC when Funding Circle cock up my tax return...
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 21, 2015 20:26:52 GMT
It would be a competitive advantage if other platforms were following the law as it's currently written. Since none appears to be actually following that, with HMRC's apparent agreement, the advantage doesn't currently exist.
I agree with you overall. Except for non-UK lenders I don't think it's actually a good idea to deduct tax from interest but the consultation is about how it should be done if it's to be done.
|
|
|
Post by reeknralf on Jul 22, 2015 8:00:22 GMT
Why do you think it makes sense to deduct tax from foreign investors?
Surely most of them are not subject to UK income tax, so they will just reclaim it. All that is achieved is a pile of unneseccary paperwork. The system which employs the fewest paper-pushers, is to deduct it from everyone by default, but allow an exemption for those who can prove they are non-tax payers. I.e. the current system for banks and building societies.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 22, 2015 8:56:38 GMT
Why do you think it makes sense to deduct tax from foreign investors? That's what the law currently says is supposed to be done: " where the interest is due to a lender who is resident outside the UK, the borrower (or the P2P platform) is required to deduct income tax at source from the interest for payment to HMRC, and to pay the interest to the lender net of tax", para 10 of the consultation document. Surely most of them are not subject to UK income tax, so they will just reclaim it. All that is achieved is a pile of unneseccary paperwork. The tax treaties I've looked at, not many, have the origin of the income taxing first, then that being used to reduce the tax due in the country of residence. So they probably are subject to UK tax. Since they are subject to it, deducting at source seems like a potentially reasonable approach that will get them a corresponding tax deduction on their local bill. I'm subject to Estonian income tax for loans made via Bondora to Estonian borrowers but the Estonian income tax rate for this happens to be zero, so I don't declare any foreign tax deducted on the foreign part of my UK tax return. Which means I end up paying full UK tax on it. The system which employs the fewest paper-pushers, is to deduct it from everyone by default, but allow an exemption for those who can prove they are non-tax payers. I.e. the current system for banks and building societies. The current system for banks and building societies does not allow all of those who will have no tax to pay to get interest paid free of tax. Notably, it's only permitted for those whose total income, including much interest, is less than their personal allowance. As the helpsheet linked there says " If you live in the UK and your total income is less than £15,600 you may be eligible to receive your bank or building society interest without tax taken off". So those with an income above that but deductions that mean no tax is due would have the tax deducted anyway and have to reclaim it. For me that would be a thousand or two Pounds of tax on interest to reclaim and I'm working on increasing that. The setup that's most beneficial to tax payers is no deduction of interest for UK residents, then only those with tax due need to declare it to HMRC. The personal savings allowance should cut that number a fair bit from what it is today. For those with tax to pay, they get to have the money tax free until they tell HMRC. And no UK resident ends up having tax deducted that they have to reclaim later. But it's not quite true that there's a need to declare it to HMRC. I think it's later this year that HMRC will start to use the quarterly savings interest reports that those deducting the ta x have to file to pre-fill tax returns and they may also start adjusting PAYE tax codes using the information after that. So no UK resident might then have to even tell HMRC about domestic untaxed or taxed interest because HMRC will tell them and they would only need to tell HMRC if there's a problem or relief to claim. With the computers taking care of most of this that's a significant avoidance of the need to push paper around.
|
|
gt94sss2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 281
Likes: 137
|
Post by gt94sss2 on Jul 22, 2015 10:53:49 GMT
But it's not quite true that there's a need to declare it to HMRC. I think it's later this year that HMRC will start to use the quarterly savings interest reports that those deducting the ta x have to file to pre-fill tax returns and they may also start adjusting PAYE tax codes using the information after that. So no UK resident might then have to even tell HMRC about domestic untaxed or taxed interest because HMRC will tell them and they would only need to tell HMRC if there's a problem or relief to claim. With the computers taking care of most of this that's a significant avoidance of the need to push paper around. Ditto. I believe as part of the £1000 'tax free' personal allowance for interest coming in next April, the rules on the taxation of interest are also changing so that banks etc. no longer need to deduct 20% tax from everyone (unless registered for an R85 etc) As james indicates, HMRC plan to get details of interest earned directly from the institutions themselves. Their argument is that 95% of savers would fall within the new allowance anyway.. It doesn't make sense to abolish this regime for banks/building societies only to introduce it for p2p lenders at the same time. Regards Sunil
|
|
mv
Member of DD Central
Posts: 156
Likes: 45
|
Post by mv on Jul 22, 2015 13:45:59 GMT
Does HMRC receive any information regarding interest payments at present from a) banks or b) P2P lenders?
Do thet rely on honesty (and the threat of prosecution/fines) for higher rate tax payers on PAYE salaries to declare interest incomes?
|
|
gt94sss2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 281
Likes: 137
|
Post by gt94sss2 on Jul 22, 2015 14:41:55 GMT
Does HMRC receive any information regarding interest payments at present from a) banks or b) P2P lenders? Yes, financial institutions have to report the amount of interest paid to HMRC. Yes - and also on IT systems to cross reference the information - which are getting better and better to the extent HMRC are going to start pre-populating these fields on their new online tax returns.
|
|
mv
Member of DD Central
Posts: 156
Likes: 45
|
Post by mv on Jul 22, 2015 14:53:27 GMT
Does HMRC receive any information regarding interest payments at present from a) banks or b) P2P lenders? Yes, financial institutions have to report the amount of interest paid to HMRC. Yes - and also on IT systems to cross reference the information - which are getting better and better to the extent HMRC are going to start pre-populating these fields on their new online tax returns. This tax year will be the first that I have any significant income from savings/investments outside of an ISA. I PAYE so will need to contact HMRC to declare. I hope the proposed IF-ISAs become available soon...
|
|
jonbvn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 326
Likes: 95
|
Post by jonbvn on Jul 22, 2015 16:14:40 GMT
I don't see how this thread is specific to MT. It is relevant to all the P2P companies and should be on the general forum.
OP, I do not see what competitive advantage MT has over any other P2P company. Please explain your 1st post.
|
|
arbster
Member of DD Central
Posts: 810
Likes: 426
|
Post by arbster on Jul 22, 2015 16:21:54 GMT
I don't see how this thread is specific to MT. It is relevant to all the P2P companies and should be on the general forum. OP, I do not see what competitive advantage MT has over any other P2P company. Please explain your 1st post. According to the current legislation, all providers of "Yearly" loans (loans of one year or longer) should deduct Income Tax at source. MoneyThing's loans are all "Short" loans, which would exempt them from needing to do this, thus giving lenders a greater compounding opportunity. However, HMRC appears to be advising P2P companies to ignore the current legislation, and none of them is deducting Income Tax at source, regardless of loan duration.
|
|
|
Post by emoney on Jul 22, 2015 17:44:57 GMT
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 22, 2015 19:09:25 GMT
I don't see how this thread is specific to MT. It is relevant to all the P2P companies and should be on the general forum. OP, I do not see what competitive advantage MT has over any other P2P company. Please explain your 1st post. All P2P companies do not collect short interest. MoneyThing does, on all of its loans that I have seen. So if current law was applied, MoneyThing would have no obligation to deduct tax from interest for UK lenders. Other firms may also have a competitive advantage under current law, like those lending from and to consumers and sole traders rather than businesses, which have a similar lack of obligation to deduct tax. Platforms lending to businesses do have an obligation to deduct if the lenders are consumers. Paragraph 10 of the consultation gives the full list of rules. For lenders this means that the platforms that deduct tax would be paying full compounding interest, while those with tax deducted won't be. Consumers who have no obligation to pay tax but income above the personal allowance would also avoid the need to overpay then reclaim tax from their activities with any deducting platforms. The consultation has two relevant proposals: 1. Removing the difference based on borrower type. 2. Removing the difference based on whether the interest is short or not. This discussion is related to proposal 2. At present it appears that HMRC has told providers that it's OK to ignore the current law and wait for P2P-specific law that this consultation is about.
|
|
james
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 955
|
Post by james on Jul 22, 2015 19:13:14 GMT
This tax year will be the first that I have any significant income from savings/investments outside of an ISA. I PAYE so will need to contact HMRC to declare. Just in case anyone has more than one year to declare, just do it, HMRC is not going to bother to try to take penalties form someone declaring a few thousand Pounds of previously undeclared interest. Can be done by phone, letter or tax return. Their guidelines on penalties would eliminate just about all possible penalty if they tried, since it would be an unprompted disclosure.
|
|
|
Post by emoney on Jul 23, 2015 10:16:22 GMT
This tax year will be the first that I have any significant income from savings/investments outside of an ISA. I PAYE so will need to contact HMRC to declare. Just in case anyone has more than one year to declare, just do it, HMRC is not going to bother to try to take penalties form someone declaring a few thousand Pounds of previously undeclared interest. Can be done by phone, letter or tax return. Their guidelines on penalties would eliminate just about all possible penalty if they tried, since it would be an unprompted disclosure. Good morning, Interestingly when you speak to the HMRC Corporation Tax team they are saying it's the obligation of the borrower to apply the 20% withold "alternative finance" tax and pay via CT61 Qaurtlerly if applicable, but the Gov't consultation document produced last week contradicts this, I am sure it will be sorted out soon and all will become clear. I have cut and paste the actual part of the consultation document that states who is responsible, but as I say this is not confirmed by HMRC - watch this space... Here's a link to the full document, it's at the bottom of my post. www.linkedin.com/pulse/hmrc-deduction-income-tax-from-p2p-interest-15-july-lee-birkett?trk=mp-author-cardChapter 3 of Part 15 ITA 2007: Which party is obliged to deduct tax? The rules that are summarised above consider whether there is an obligation to deduct income tax at source from a payment of interest. If there is an obligation, then then we next need to consider who has the obligation to deduct the tax. Section 874(2) states: The person by or though whom the payment is made must, on making the payment, deduct from it a sum representing income tax on it at the savings rate in force for the tax year in which it is made. This means that both the person who makes the payment (the borrower), and any person
through whom that payment is made (such as a platform) share the obligation to deduct tax from the payment. Once any person deducts the correct amount of tax at the correct time then the requirements are satisfied for all concerned along the payment chain.
|
|