amphoria
Member of DD Central
Posts: 156
Likes: 124
|
Post by amphoria on Feb 8, 2018 12:01:10 GMT
I didn't find an information about the next interest payment date of a loan. It would be rather helpfull to add this. Most MT loans pay interest monthly on the same day of the month as the end date of the loan.
|
|
|
Post by GSV3MIaC on Feb 8, 2018 12:21:53 GMT
Except some of the end dates just changed by a few days and the interest dates (as far as I know) did not?
|
|
|
Post by oktaeder on Feb 8, 2018 13:00:50 GMT
Yes, back in the day that wasn't an issue. But now some of the dates difficult to understand.
|
|
archie
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 1,842
|
Post by archie on Feb 8, 2018 13:15:31 GMT
If we no longer need the rollover column they could replace it with an interest date column.
|
|
|
Post by george4064 on Feb 12, 2018 22:42:14 GMT
Every time I try to invest into a loan it gives '404 not found', this happens with every loan I try.
Please advise.
|
|
ptr120
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 1,346
|
Post by ptr120 on Feb 12, 2018 23:09:51 GMT
Every time I try to invest into a loan it gives '404 not found', this happens with every loan I try. Please advise. Same here MoneyThing - please can you switch it off an on again?
|
|
elliotn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 2,681
|
Post by elliotn on Feb 13, 2018 1:50:56 GMT
Every time I try to invest into a loan it gives '404 not found', this happens with every loan I try. Please advise. Same here MoneyThing - please can you switch it off an on again? Yep. In case it was divine intervention I made a withdrawal instead.
|
|
|
Post by sirkillalot on Feb 16, 2018 11:15:59 GMT
I have a single chunk of Sweetlands up for sale. It reached the head of the queue and parts started to sell. However, it now appears that i'm £614 behind the front of the queue.
Moneything - how is it possible that somebody jumped ahead of me ? Is this a known bug ?
Unsold Queued Behind Sold (FPAC928) SweetLand Ltd - Non Asset Backed £5,567 £614 £2,933
|
|
|
Post by BaileyThing on Feb 16, 2018 11:38:05 GMT
Could you please email me on support@moneything.com so i can investigate this further.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 7,918
|
Post by SteveT on Mar 1, 2018 11:05:40 GMT
MoneyThing Hi Ed, unless I've lost the plot somewhere, it appears that the Statement export / download function has been changed at some point last month to add a date search capabilty (rather than always downloading the whole transaction history). For some reason this has resulted in the transaction sequence in the download file now running from "newest to oldest", rather than the more usual "oldest to newest", even if the page has first been sorted to view transactions "oldest to newest" on-screen. This wouldn't be a problem if the downloaded file sorted on Date correctly, so that the transaction sequence can be reversed in Excel. However, when I do this, transactions with the same date get shuffled so that the running balance jumps all over the place. Could you please either reverse the default sequence of the download file, back to "oldest to newest", or else somehow ensure that when the Date column in the download file is sorted "oldest to newest", the transactions remain in the correct sequence? Otherwise we're all going to have to modify our own spreadsheets to accommodate the change! Thanks. Ps. If anyone else has a quick work-around to get to "oldest to newest" in the correct sequence, please advise!
|
|
|
Post by MoneyThing on Mar 1, 2018 11:12:26 GMT
MoneyThing Hi Ed, unless I've lost the plot somewhere, it appears that the Statement export / download function has been changed at some point last month to add a date search capabilty (rather than always downloading the whole transaction history). For some reason this has resulted in the transaction sequence in the download file now running from "newest to oldest", rather than the more usual "oldest to newest", even if the page has first been sorted to view transactions "oldest to newest" on-screen. This wouldn't be a problem if the downloaded file sorted on Date correctly, so that the transaction sequence can be reversed in Excel. However, when I do this, transactions with the same date get shuffled so that the running balance jumps all over the place. Could you please either reverse the default sequence of the download file, back to "oldest to newest", or else somehow ensure that when the Date column in the download file is sorted "oldest to newest", the transactions remain in the correct sequence? Otherwise we're all going to have to modify our own spreadsheets to accommodate the change! Thanks. Ps. If anyone else has a quick work-around to get to "oldest to newest" in the correct sequence, please advise! Morning SteveT. Will look into this for you. (We have recently added the date search capability as some very active long term lenders had too many transactions for Excel/CSV to handle). Regards, Ed.
|
|
elliotn
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 2,681
|
Post by elliotn on Mar 1, 2018 11:39:12 GMT
MoneyThing Hi Ed, unless I've lost the plot somewhere, it appears that the Statement export / download function has been changed at some point last month to add a date search capabilty (rather than always downloading the whole transaction history). For some reason this has resulted in the transaction sequence in the download file now running from "newest to oldest", rather than the more usual "oldest to newest", even if the page has first been sorted to view transactions "oldest to newest" on-screen. This wouldn't be a problem if the downloaded file sorted on Date correctly, so that the transaction sequence can be reversed in Excel. However, when I do this, transactions with the same date get shuffled so that the running balance jumps all over the place. Could you please either reverse the default sequence of the download file, back to "oldest to newest", or else somehow ensure that when the Date column in the download file is sorted "oldest to newest", the transactions remain in the correct sequence? Otherwise we're all going to have to modify our own spreadsheets to accommodate the change! Thanks. Ps. If anyone else has a quick work-around to get to "oldest to newest" in the correct sequence, please advise! On one of my downloads I add a temporary column to number them, sort to get old to new and then exclude the numbering from my data import, could that help?
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 7,918
|
Post by SteveT on Mar 1, 2018 11:40:46 GMT
On one of my downloads I add a temporary column to number them, sort to get old to new and then exclude the numbering from my data import, could that help? Nice one. It's so cold here at the moment that the creative side of my brain must have frozen!
|
|
|
Post by MoneyThing on Mar 2, 2018 7:40:20 GMT
MoneyThing Hi Ed, unless I've lost the plot somewhere, it appears that the Statement export / download function has been changed at some point last month to add a date search capabilty (rather than always downloading the whole transaction history). For some reason this has resulted in the transaction sequence in the download file now running from "newest to oldest", rather than the more usual "oldest to newest", even if the page has first been sorted to view transactions "oldest to newest" on-screen. This wouldn't be a problem if the downloaded file sorted on Date correctly, so that the transaction sequence can be reversed in Excel. However, when I do this, transactions with the same date get shuffled so that the running balance jumps all over the place. Could you please either reverse the default sequence of the download file, back to "oldest to newest", or else somehow ensure that when the Date column in the download file is sorted "oldest to newest", the transactions remain in the correct sequence? Otherwise we're all going to have to modify our own spreadsheets to accommodate the change! Thanks. Ps. If anyone else has a quick work-around to get to "oldest to newest" in the correct sequence, please advise! Morning. Export now reversed. Regards, Ed.
|
|
copacetic
Member of DD Central
Posts: 305
Likes: 666
|
Post by copacetic on Mar 28, 2018 10:34:47 GMT
For security purposes could I suggest that you astrix out the first 4 digits dispayed on the website in our nominated bank account? Admittedly the scope for fraud in the event this information was hacked isn't huge but a fraudster could set up an unauthorised direct debit on that account.
|
|