bernard
Member of DD Central
Posts: 66 
Likes: 24
|
Post by bernard on Oct 3, 2016 19:46:14 GMT
Some clarification required on the permissions received and on the development schedule from fundingsecure : - Valuers report assumes full permission for development. Permission given by Sedgemoor council for prior approval for change of use from office to dwelling (2014). This planning application envisages a single story, 5 bedroom property. However the valuation report assumes a development over three floors, I can't see any other planning permission for the same borrower, does the property currently have the planning permission for the proposed development as envisaged by the valuation, as opposed to the 2014 approved scheme? Secondly, refi stated to be through development finance. The photos indicate development has not started. When does borrower intend to begin development / refi with development finance? Reading between the lines I would imagine that the borrower does not have the planning for the full scheme, and is trying to get it, before development (and refi) can begin. However, this then means that the stated valuation is misleading.... More clarity required, especially on the correct valuation of the building without the full assumption of planning that it may not have? Or of course any info on where I am mistaken? |
|
Investboy
Member of DD Central
Trying to recover from P2P revolution
Posts: 564
Likes: 201
|
Post by Investboy on Oct 4, 2016 12:26:44 GMT
Hurry up and change the title of your post to remove borrower's name!
|
|
|
|
Post by martin44 on Oct 4, 2016 12:32:13 GMT
dont think you can the change a thread title, delete whole thread asap, if that possible.
edit... oh yes you can.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 11,097
|
Post by ilmoro on Oct 4, 2016 12:34:02 GMT
dont think you can the change a thread title, delete whole thread asap, if that possible. edit... oh yes you can. OP can or mod/admin. Somebody just need to report it and would have been done quicker. Report post in menu under cog top right
|
|
|
|
Post by martin44 on Oct 4, 2016 12:36:08 GMT
dont think you can the change a thread title, delete whole thread asap, if that possible. edit... oh yes you can. OP can or mod/admin. Thanks... another list addition. 
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 7,918
|
Post by SteveT on Oct 4, 2016 12:42:15 GMT
dont think you can the change a thread title, delete whole thread asap, if that possible. edit... oh yes you can. OP can or mod/admin. Somebody just need to report it and would have been done quicker. Report post in menu under cog top right Yup, these things generally get fixed very quickly once members report them (all of the Mod team get an immediate email and whoever is closest deals).
|
|
|
|
Post by reeknralf on Oct 14, 2016 7:22:52 GMT
bernardThe application I've seen (Planning Application Number: **/**/00051) was granted 28/08. Do you want to double check?
|
|
|
|
Post by reeknralf on Dec 20, 2016 19:24:59 GMT
"SteveT: Redacted to prevent identification of the asset" I can't see it's achieved much putting a pile of *'s in the thread title, when the address still has the unedited version. Attachments:
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 7,918
|
Post by SteveT on Dec 21, 2016 10:25:41 GMT
"SteveT: Redacted to prevent identification of the asset" I can't see it's achieved much putting a pile of *'s in the thread title, when the address still has the unedited version. Possibly a browser page caching issue? Does it still show the same after you clear your cache? When I view that thread (in Chrome), the page address reads p2pindependentforum.com/thread/6674/quarry-1426737261-1641046224
|
|
|
|
Post by reeknralf on Dec 21, 2016 11:42:23 GMT
It's not related to my cache.
It seems that if you access the page direct from elsewhere on the web, you get the full name, but if you access from another forum page it just says "quarry". There seem to be 2 otherwise identical entries in the forum's index, which you get depends how you access it.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 7,918
|
Post by SteveT on Dec 21, 2016 11:51:45 GMT
It seems that if you access the page direct from elsewhere on the web, you get the full name, but if you access from another forum page it just says "quarry". There seem to be 2 otherwise identical entries in the forum's index, which you get depends how you access it. Probably me being slow, but how / why would you be accessing the page "direct from elsewhere on the web"? Do you mean via a saved bookmark, perhaps? Or a Google search (on what terms?)
|
|
|
|
Post by paul123 on Dec 21, 2016 12:18:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mrclondon on Dec 21, 2016 12:28:31 GMT
Hmm ... interesting. This is what a google of c***** quarry p2p reveals; the page was cached by google on 3rd Oct before we had a chance to alter the thread title on 4th Oct.  |
|
mikes1531
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,452
Likes: 2,320
|
Post by mikes1531 on Dec 21, 2016 16:39:51 GMT
Hmm ... interesting. This is what a google of c***** quarry p2p reveals; the page was cached by google on 3rd Oct before we had a chance to alter the thread title on 4th Oct. : What exactly did you Google to come up with that screenshot? "c***** quarry p2p", or the actual name of the quarry? If I use the starred search term now, it brings up the P2PIF thread, but not the document name as shown in your screenshot. If it's necessary to include the actually quarry name in order to bring up the link that includes the name then I don't see a problem because if the person making the search already knows the name then the search result isn't revealing anything they don't already know.
|
|
|
|
Post by reeknralf on Dec 21, 2016 17:14:35 GMT
It means that when a mod does their asterix thing, and you want to see the unedited version, you can try the cached version on google. Personally, I don't know how to access anything older than the most recent cached version, so it would only work for a week or two.
|
|
