stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Oct 20, 2016 12:45:57 GMT
Just debating internally which I prefer on Collateral and wondered others thoughts?
Grouped Assets have the benefit of of being able to invest larger amounts in one go, without the need to attend several loan launches.
However all assets are with one borrower, rather than potentially (collateral won't currently reveal which borrowers are for which loans, but I understand loan coding is coming to do this) spread of borrowers. Although risk would be similar, a default of single borrower could have a greater affect
Grouped asset loans on MT are different as they are grouped pawn loans to third parties rather than on stock to one lender, but they have the benefit of swapping out defaults
Other thoughts please?
|
|
stevio
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 894
|
Post by stevio on Oct 21, 2016 9:12:40 GMT
Looks like just me considering this then!
|
|
n
Member of DD Central
Yet another Nick
Posts: 879
Likes: 461
|
Post by n on Oct 21, 2016 14:02:36 GMT
I assume we are only talking about jewellery here.
As you say the Groups are larger loans, and also of a longer duration, otherwise they are the same as any other loan as far as I can see. Same asset class, single borrower who may have other loans (except where/as specified).
Maybe there will be more chance of them renewing but that is a way down the road.
Whether these things are desirable probably depends on the size of your pocket, your willingness to spend time on the platform, your faith in the liquidity of the SM and other things I haven't thought of. It will be a personal choice for each individual.
When the rate of new money entering the platform has increased a few fold I expect the smaller loans will not be practical so grouping might be the way forward. Or turn into Unbolted (which I also like, if only they had more loans).
|
|
|
Post by Collateral Rep on Oct 25, 2016 15:06:36 GMT
Hi,
This is something we will look to add to the loan listings in the future.
Many thanks,
Gordon
|
|
upland
Member of DD Central
Posts: 478
Likes: 175
|
Post by upland on Oct 28, 2016 6:16:04 GMT
Any additional real assurances would be good. We tend to forget that only a few years ago a lot of financial institutions bought a lot of assets that were worth a lot less than they thought and it resulted in a lot of trouble.
|
|