|
Post by brummiefred on Apr 3, 2015 19:55:48 GMT
Thanks il moro, that has enabled me to double check emails and it does seem that my substantial holding in 101 has been overlooked, and it is only down to this forum that I know about the proposed rollover.
Jonno, I am more Great than Perry, don't you know!
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Apr 3, 2015 11:26:21 GMT
We (two accounts) do not appear to have received any communications! Can someone tell me what date please.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Feb 20, 2015 19:15:22 GMT
That's strange 'cos I bought £2.79 on 19th !!!
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Feb 19, 2015 23:34:21 GMT
Two accounts; one stands at 13% the other (hers) at 15.5%, and no exposure to the plumber.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 18, 2014 22:33:27 GMT
I think it's more the fact that the loan is against a business property, ie LTL, and not a domestic residence. Although in the W*** situation it is the back up security that is a residential and not the primary business.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 7, 2014 17:32:00 GMT
Concerning the Slough Comm loan units sold at 00.16 on 3 Nov from my partner's and another's (see earlier post) @dominic reports that 'our developers have vowed to continue working on this until they can offer an explanation', but nothing to date yet. chrisplease note.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 5, 2014 18:53:08 GMT
Thanks for that mike (in ledbury?) and RR.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 5, 2014 10:53:09 GMT
Well well!!
Slough Comm sold at 00.16 on 2nd November.
Chris please take note and investigate please. (How does a person get the name to appear in blue?)
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 5, 2014 9:51:55 GMT
What is it about Slough that MLA doesn't like? A large portion of our holding was sold off without instruction and although we have emailed David Ricketts there has been no explanation as yet. Maybe Chris could investigate?
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Nov 2, 2014 17:56:02 GMT
I too have suffered from unwanted feature of silly micro bits being purchased without having given instruction or wanted them.
Therefore I changed the instructions to put all repayments in the cash account until I decide what to do. I did this on both my account and that of my partner, but today find that the system has sold approx £5000 of Slough Commercial without instruction.
I have never used anything other than manual instruction, hate all automated bidding or systems that are beyond my control.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Oct 9, 2014 23:34:21 GMT
Stating that funds held by the solicitor would be transfered to AC this afternoon and that when received will be distributed to lenders.
What more do we need to know?
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Sept 22, 2014 14:48:53 GMT
Some G***n B***r Deal just seen on AM
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Jul 4, 2014 6:45:54 GMT
As I understand it, there is no drawdown period, the loan is already live and paying the 12%.
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on May 15, 2014 19:29:19 GMT
Whenever a builder (Main Contractor) fails financially then inevitably the sub-contractors are placed in a difficult position.
Payments are made, usually monthly, after a valuation of the works completed, and then paid less a retention, a further month later, by which time all parties have invested at least two months of completed work together with any uninstalled material, which becomes the property of the MC, and the Client/Customer. Not possible to stop work, even if one suspected problems, whilst under contract to complete the work by a certain date.
With small margins and a history of failures, I would describe the life of a subbie as truly 'living on the edge', further complicated by the 'eggs in a basket' problem. One gets to know a MC who gets to enjoy the working relationship and offers more work, and so on..........
|
|
|
Post by brummiefred on Feb 19, 2014 21:49:21 GMT
Leeds, CC Leisure and Hackney available at 21.45
|
|