bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on May 1, 2022 13:38:03 GMT
Mine was incorrect by a three digit figure both verified by myself and accountants. The problem is that they will probably have reported that figure to HMRC and if you get selected for enquiry, you got a lot of explaining to do to unravel it all. I would’ve thought HMRC would be happy as I am paying extra then what was reported?
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on May 1, 2022 7:33:41 GMT
Mine was incorrect by a three digit figure both verified by myself and accountants.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Apr 30, 2022 7:55:45 GMT
Well that's naughty .. my maximum auto bid was selected to 2k on two accounts and I ended up with 8K total "investment through AutoLend Always On." Super bang out of order. Also wouldn't have even happened if Wembley didn't redeem. 8k across 2 accounts suggests £4k across each account and with a max £2k autobus this suggests £2k in each of Tranches A and B? Is this correct? Asking as I thought only Tranche A was allocated in Autolend always on, so wondering if this rule has now changed and Tranche B is now also allocated? No your understanding is not correct. :-) I had maximum bid of 2k. But I received 4k of A. But because I have two accounts I received a total of 8k of A. :-( Basically they have a token method of allocations and instead of allocating in 1k amounts it somehow defaulted to 2k amounts. So if I had a minimum bid of say 3k I would have received 6k equaling 12K of A! (assuming funds were on deposit). arrrrgh... oh why oh why did Wembley loan have to redeem early. :-( Edit.. just saw the borrower is a "known" borrower so at least I am happy on that front.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Apr 30, 2022 5:58:22 GMT
Well that's naughty .. my maximum auto bid was selected to 2k on two accounts and I ended up with 8K total "investment through AutoLend Always On." Super bang out of order. Also wouldn't have even happened if Wembley didn't redeem.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Apr 6, 2022 19:14:42 GMT
And it sold....
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 27, 2022 23:34:05 GMT
Still no sale but I received an email that I need to reduce the selling price to 104.12.
Wish I could reduce it to 100 and maybe get a sale.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 25, 2022 6:23:43 GMT
Unfortunately not. I don't bother checking daily anymore. I am just glad it is not a long dated bond.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 17, 2022 22:19:39 GMT
Ahh this was the Starbucks loan.. I had doubts on it so I did not bid. I vaguely recall the site was not worth much if the cafe failed. Glad to see it has redeemed without issues.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 17, 2022 6:42:10 GMT
Incorrect. Always on bidders do not receive an email indicating a failed loan bid. oh.. seems strange as self select do.. I beg you, please stop posting assumptions
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 17, 2022 6:36:19 GMT
Last 3 loans mid*,shi*, shi*, total 931k, 1k max with always-on autolend, without a slice suggest they now have a good bit more than 931 investors, might explain a few things if the staff hasn't increased.
They have increased staff numbers This is wrong or misinformation or disinformation. Fact is staff numbers have not increased to pre-pandemic levels
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 11, 2022 0:34:11 GMT
If you were an always on bidder you should have got an email indicating your failed loan bid from Admin. Incorrect. Always on bidders do not receive an email indicating a failed loan bid.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 10, 2022 21:45:26 GMT
New 36-month commercial term loan for Shirley R*** (PL) has been announced. Allocation of TrancheA funds for Always-On lenders has already taken place (Wednesday 9-Mar) and is now fully-funded. The wording for the other loan Shirley M*** U*** is different. "Allocation of TrancheA funds for Always-On lenders has already taken place (Thursday 10-Mar) and is now fully-funded, with some Always-On lenders being unsuccessful. " 1) Does that imply all always-on lenders were successful for this Shirley R*** ? 2) Where is the information coming from as I did not receive a email to say some always-on lenders were unsuccessful?
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 8, 2022 22:23:34 GMT
But no availability so unlikely to cannibalise sales of my bond.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 7, 2022 21:38:01 GMT
June 23 bond. No not asked WA why bond is not selling. Some sold but not all. Wouldn’t dare by long dated bonds after this experience.
|
|
bababill
Member of DD Central
Posts: 525
Likes: 243
|
Post by bababill on Mar 6, 2022 23:50:52 GMT
Been trying to sell this bond since last year. Be warned liquidity is not necessarily that great.
|
|