|
Post by erniec on Nov 3, 2018 15:17:52 GMT
Deficit in October. Not impressed. It’s not unusual to get an occasional month in deficit. On that account, how often has it shown a monthly deficit against a monthly gain?
|
|
|
Post by p2psavvy on Nov 3, 2018 15:57:33 GMT
My negative comment of "another month of losses" was misplaced. I did actually earn some interest in October. Well just!
These are my defaults versus interest received as a percentage, including default recoveries. All of the -100%, or worse, were my losing months. April and September defaults were almost double the interest received.
Nov-2017 -102.26%
Dec-2017 -28.04%
Jan-2018 -54.78%
Feb-2018 -167.48%
Mar-2018 -40.50%
Apr-2018 -192.33%
May-2018 -129.40%
Jun-2018 -130.85%
Jul-2018 -113.88% Aug-2018 -67.64%
Sep-2018 -195.16%
Oct-2018 -92.70%
My IRR for the past twelve months is -0.73% with 3.55% over the full time with Zopa. Looking at my arrears list, I can't see this improving any time soon.
I think something was seriously wrong with the Zopa Plus model. Just too many poorly vetted and/or low grade borrowers.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 3, 2018 16:39:51 GMT
My negative comment of "another month of losses" was misplaced. I did actually earn some interest in October. Well just! These are my defaults versus interest received as a percentage, including default recoveries. All of the -100%, or worse, were my losing months. April and September defaults were almost double the interest received. Nov-2017 -102.26% Dec-2017 -28.04% Jan-2018 -54.78% Feb-2018 -167.48% Mar-2018 -40.50% Apr-2018 -192.33% May-2018 -129.40% Jun-2018 -130.85% Jul-2018 -113.88% Aug-2018 -67.64% Sep-2018 -195.16% Oct-2018 -92.70%
My IRR for the past twelve months is -0.73% with 3.55% over the full time with Zopa. Looking at my arrears list, I can't see this improving any time soon. I think something was seriously wrong with the Zopa Plus model. Just too many poorly vetted and/or low grade borrowers. Blimey am I glad I didn't lend all in Plus now. That is very bad p2psavvy i'm not sure I would have held my nerve. Are those loans defaulting of a very high value i'e >£10 loans say. In each month how many loans are actually defaulting 5,6 7 etc. If you lent at 10k all at once then I'm guessing the book started off with £100 loans but since has in the region of 64 £10 loans - assuming it started off ok. I've been in ISA since June 2017 but I did, as I have said many times else where, lend in £10 blocks. Mrs Aju has not faired as well as I have. Her worst months defaults were Jun 59.50% of interest received, Jul 56.48% and oct 52.57%.
|
|
|
Post by p2psavvy on Nov 3, 2018 19:07:54 GMT
Blimey am I glad I didn't lend all in Plus now. That is very bad p2psavvy i'm not sure I would have held my nerve. Are those loans defaulting of a very high value i'e >£10 loans say. In each month how many loans are actually defaulting 5,6 7 etc. If you lent at 10k all at once then I'm guessing the book started off with £100 loans but since has in the region of 64 £10 loans - assuming it started off ok. I've been in ISA since June 2017 but I did, as I have said many times else where, lend in £10 blocks. Mrs Aju has not faired as well as I have. Her worst months defaults were Jun 59.50% of interest received, Jul 56.48% and oct 52.57%. The £10k was fed in over several weeks to ensure only £10 loan parts. I did reinvest repayments for a few months so the total invested got to £10,330. My total defaults, to date, is 108 out of about 1200 total loans. I now have about 700 loans left. This year the highest number of defaults in a month is 12, my least is four. Fortunately, my investment into ZOPA only represented a tiny fraction of my total investment portfolio, so no real harm done. I do think that having no provision fund and the very low rates that ZOPA actually achieve, does put investors on a cliff edge. A five year FSCS protected bond can be had for about 2.75%. ZOPA's 3%-4% return, with no protection, and really being just a guess, does not make sense to me. Both myself and my wife have six figures in Ratesetter and have, over the past five years, achieved about 6% return. Of course a provision fund is only effectively a shared loss buffer but it does ensure that, in normal circumstances, the rate you are offered is the rate you actually achieve. Unlike ZOPA's "Target Rate" which, to me, is just meaningless. A target can be set at whatever you like to attract investors. I certainly have not achieved the "Target Rate" offered to me at sign up with ZOPA and never will.
|
|
|
Post by newlender on Nov 3, 2018 20:27:49 GMT
IFISA open for 17 months. 80%/20% Core/Plus. Every month in positive territory and an annualised average of 3.86% net (5.33% gross). February this year was my worst month when I lost >60% of interest to defaults. I suspect that the more we on this forum have in Z+, the more we will be worried. My stats ( with a smallish Z+ %) are not brilliant, given the risk of P2P. But the lack of tax on my earnings does affect my decision to plough on. I am drawing down my Investment side as it is paid out. With regards to the thread title - we are not giving it away just yet but we are investing in a product that seems to vary enormously for individual posters on the forum.
|
|
zlb
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 333
|
Post by zlb on Nov 3, 2018 22:32:41 GMT
Deficit in October. Not impressed. It’s not unusual to get an occasional month in deficit. On that account, how often has it shown a monthly deficit against a monthly gain? it's been approx 30% of interest lost to defaults over all, approx 25% in plus. Not had a negative before, but very close to it eg £2 instead of a more usual positive £70ish after losses. This was -£16. This is very rough,
|
|
|
Post by newlender on Nov 4, 2018 6:22:44 GMT
On our dashboard below the details of each investment there's a very informative video outlining the pattern of defaults that we might expect to see. This appeared at about the same time that Zopa tweaked Z+ to reduce the D and E exposure in response to our concerns. The more loans a portfolio amasses through reinvestment the more defaults there will be - this is only logical. The idea is that these will be offset by more income being generated from the new 'good' loans. One month in deficit from time to time is to be expected - the whole idea is to see what happens over at least a year or even longer. That being said, the net rates that we are getting are not wonderful given the risk and that is the main concern for me. I would never invest much above 20% of my Zopa portfolio in Z+ if I wanted to avoid negative months - my 20/80 Z+/Core spread seems to be working well, although there are some A*/A2/B defaults appearing now. 20% of interest lost to defaults in 17 months in a 20/80 portfolio but I'm still £1200 up so far overall. So investing? Yes. Taking a big risk for a slightly better net return? Yes.
|
|
paule
Posts: 44
Likes: 10
|
Post by paule on Nov 4, 2018 9:38:38 GMT
I have joined here as my zopa loans are performing terribly and wanted to see other's experiences,I put 25k in 18 months ago (all into plus I must add) and am now showing interest of less than £900, bad debt of more than £3k, the return has just dropped and dropped over the last five months or so as -ve month after -ve month has occurred.
I did open an ISA a few months ago prior to it all going bad, and this is currently ok but is before the bad debts start coming through.
I feel Zopa has been very poor at judging good risk or balancing my portfolio, so am drawing it down as it is returned.
A lesson learnt..
|
|
benaj
Member of DD Central
N/A
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 1,737
|
Post by benaj on Nov 4, 2018 11:15:53 GMT
I have joined here as my zopa loans are performing terribly and wanted to see other's experiences,I put 25k in 18 months ago (all into plus I must add) and am now showing interest of less than £900, bad debt of more than £3k, the return has just dropped and dropped over the last five months or so as -ve month after -ve month has occurred. I did open an ISA a few months ago prior to it all going bad, and this is currently ok but is before the bad debts start coming through. I feel Zopa has been very poor at judging good risk or balancing my portfolio, so am drawing it down as it is returned. A lesson learnt.. paule , unfortunately, zopa plus return performance is not guaranteed. Some enjoys better return, some doesn't. It seems that your plus loan book has a much higher default than expected, gross return for 18 months is 15.6% but the default is 12% I got a feeling your lending isn't well diversified, higher numbers of defaults from C/D/E borrowers, did you load up 25k in one go 18 months ago? I have 32 defaults from 1107 loans with my 8 months Zopa plus investment, and bad debt is 4.5% of all time investment. As today, my real profit is 0.17% (money withdrawal - deposit) after selling of the entire z+ portfolio in Nov '17 and paying selling fees.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 4, 2018 11:34:29 GMT
I have joined here as my zopa loans are performing terribly and wanted to see other's experiences,I put 25k in 18 months ago (all into plus I must add) and am now showing interest of less than £900, bad debt of more than £3k, the return has just dropped and dropped over the last five months or so as -ve month after -ve month has occurred. I did open an ISA a few months ago prior to it all going bad, and this is currently ok but is before the bad debts start coming through. I feel Zopa has been very poor at judging good risk or balancing my portfolio, so am drawing it down as it is returned. A lesson learnt.. Hi paule , Welcome to the forum its not a great result so far as I can tell from your comments. Did you lend the £25000 all at once, I'm guessing you did and if I am right you will have starting loans of £250 (unless there is a max zopa lends at) if that is the case and you had relend on you would have then picked up £10 loans, I think. I do wonder how many people actually lending on Zopa are being fooled into thinking this is a safe bet and there will not be any down sides in the hurry to get better rates. Zopa itself even gets it wrong and also I wonder how many people realise there is no downside for Zopa itself if the defaults get worse other than a drift of customers and bad PR of course. Whilst I am not sure I am correct in my theories and I still have to give Classic some time to process out (they are covered for defaults so the rates are almost guaranteed) turning relend off might make things worse. Hopefully you have read the whole of this thread from start to finish and will notice that people have pulled out and then comment on their decreasing return and Zopa's stick with forcast rates rather than provide true rates of return, especially on dead (defaulted) loans. I cannot guarantee this of course but my experience over the defaults I have received - many are way back in the early days as well as an increasing abundance of them more recently (I am lending larger amounts so the defaults obviously will increase) - I am seeing at least 45-55% payback, including interest that is, of the older defaults. Some of them will not payback until 2024 at the rates they are paying back...very sloooooooowly. It's a bit too soon to judge the more recent defaults. Ok so your position is a very scary one I get it and to be fair my lending of 20/80 plus/Other makes it easier for me to say this but I wonder if you might fair a lot better by perhaps not drawing down but rather move relending into Core, you will still get defaults but it might stabilise the returns. The other thing to consider by the drawing down is that the returned interest you get in the early months is the higher than the later years and it should (I use this term lightly of course) prop up the basic rate. The lower rates on the Plus and the Core in my opinion have always been the ones to consider the upper rates in my eyes are a bonus but I guess having been around the block and gained a lot of cynicism over the years. One interesting thing with the defaults that not many people have considered and it's difficult to gauge the problem is the Classic products default rates. I was shocked when I had noticed that there were over £900 of classic loans that were defaulted during the period I had gained them before it was pulled. Thats a large number for me and it always worried me that Zopa saying they pulled Classic because of tax change reason did not ring, especially if one reads the original advertising of it, when in fact it was likely they could see the additional money required for it was being clawed at a higher rate and perhaps less sustainable. All of the above is not tried and tested after all I'm not an expert in what might or might not happen, no one is to be honest, but for me most of these loans are long term investment and I'm still not convinced that 18 months is long enough as the storm arrives usually 6-18 months. If I were in your position and with your losses I might be panicking more but i would still want to see what happens if I let it ride. After all compounding is a wonderful tool that may pull this out. Ooops I've got a bit verbal so sorry if this doesn't help, one final thing if you haven't already considered it then it may be worth looking at the option of selling the good loans at 1% but make sure you are aware of the rates you have achieved so far.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 4, 2018 16:18:38 GMT
I like the idea of this shirehorse, what tool/s did you use here to generate this?. Mrs Aju's personal default rate in ISA (I have that one loaded into my stats tools as I write) is - 1.03% (36) on current.csv and 0.84% (36) on alltime.csv (since 2005) by loan numbers (3484/4265 total)
- 0.98% (£321.90) on current.csv by value (Some defaults are paying back either Cap, Int or both, many nothing )
She even had a default fully pay up a week or so ago, not seen that one much though. Her investment split is approx 20/80 but on the 80 side she has quite a bit of classic loans still, she is currently adding a recently transferred in ISA in £10 blocks in similar ratios. The above does not include defaults in classic as they are not a cost issue. As I said earlier the classic loans default rate can also seem quite high but I've not analysed that part as to be honest its not really relevant to damaging defaults.
|
|
paule
Posts: 44
Likes: 10
|
Post by paule on Nov 5, 2018 10:36:57 GMT
ajuMany thanks for the reply, you do talk a lot of sense. And it is promising to hear defaults being paid back - my experience to date has been of very little being" recovered". I understand that defaults will mostly occur early on with borrowers who have no intention of paying back the loan, what has shocked me is how many bad debts have been written off over the last six months or so. The dropping of the safeguard did really pull the safety net from under my investment and perhaps I should have moved on then rather than go chasing the extra 1% or so "promised" by plus. I'm not actually risk adverse but it just seems that recently this has turned into a very poor investment. Almost on a par with my stocks and shares decisions LOL (expecting a recession invested in RBS before the crash, BP before deepwater horizon...) I will keep my ISA for the time being with investment turned on but draw down my non ISA, it seems to me that loans made a year or so ago by Zopa are performing very badly indeed at the moment. Thanks again...
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 5, 2018 15:03:16 GMT
aju Many thanks for the reply, you do talk a lot of sense. And it is promising to hear defaults being paid back - my experience to date has been of very little being" recovered". I understand that defaults will mostly occur early on with borrowers who have no intention of paying back the loan, what has shocked me is how many bad debts have been written off over the last six months or so. The dropping of the safeguard did really pull the safety net from under my investment and perhaps I should have moved on then rather than go chasing the extra 1% or so "promised" by plus. I'm not actually risk adverse but it just seems that recently this has turned into a very poor investment. Almost on a par with my stocks and shares decisions LOL (expecting a recession invested in RBS before the crash, BP before deepwater horizon...) I will keep my ISA for the time being with investment turned on but draw down my non ISA, it seems to me that loans made a year or so ago by Zopa are performing very badly indeed at the moment. Thanks again... Thanks paule , after I read it through I thought I could have been a bit more concise but hey talking sense, lets not get too carried away. When you say written off do you mean that zopa has taken the decision to no longer pursue them. I know there are some bankruptcies and the like and some of mine have even gone abroad!. Some will move house and wipe their existence clean, so to speak. Some will surface again in the future, hopefully. One thing I picked up from a couple of other forumites was to keep bothering Zopa if there has been little activity on a given loan. Last new year I prodded Zopa for updates on all my loans where no payments had been made and no comments updated for over 2 years. Zopa didn't really give much more detail but at least they might have put a more recent marker in some defaulters files. Also keeps Zopa on their toes too. It's interesting about the Safeguard withdrawal, my relending to Core on all our accounts seems to have picked up quite a bit of SG stuff since last December. I guess there are a lot of people selling off their SG loans although its dropped off lately. I'd have preferred it if SG had stayed but that's life I guess. Before it finished in December I got Mrs AJU to pump a further large amount into it, not really caring about the loan size, as she's a non tax payer anyway. We would have put it into the ISA offering but she was already over the limit in ISA for the year. For a one view look at our 4 accounts in Invest(2) and ISA(2), grouped together then but it may be interesting to consider the following stats .. Alltime (4 accounts) Total Core Loans = 8155 since start of 2017Core Loans in 2017 = 3554 have 50 Defaults = 1.41% of Core loans originating in 2017 Core Loans in 2018 = 4601 have 5 Defaults = 0.11% of Core loans originating in 2018 Alltime (4 accounts) Total Plus Loans = 2552 since start of 2016
Plus Loans in 2016 = 288 have 20 Defaults = 6.94% of Plus loans originating in 2016 Plus Loans in 2017 = 630 have 18 Defaults = 2.86% of Plus loans originating in 2017 Plus Loans in 2018 = 1634 have 5 Defaults = 0.31% of Plus loans originating in 2018 (Note Zopa IFISA did not exist in 2016 so its just 2 Invest accounts active that year) Zopa did have some issues with D/E loans in 2017 so hopefully the 2018 loans may have improved as the mix ratios were reduced from 30% to 15%(I think!). Now I know this is just a snapshot of 2 Invest and 2 ISA accounts and it should be recognised that a large number of these loans still have plenty of time on the clock to go bad but it does start to make me feel a bit more comfortable using the 20/80 rule. That said these do not count the default rates if SG is plugged in. Moving forward as SG cover reduces that would almost certainly alter the landscape. (I must get round to factoring in the Loan default rates of SG as well by using the default date field value as a counter too.) Not sure that makes things much clearer but its a view we can see from Aju Towers...
|
|
benaj
Member of DD Central
N/A
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 1,737
|
Post by benaj on Nov 5, 2018 17:29:12 GMT
aju ... Almost on a par with my stocks and shares decisions LOL (expecting a recession invested in RBS before the crash, BP before deepwater horizon...) I will keep my ISA for the time being with investment turned on but draw down my non ISA, it seems to me that loans made a year or so ago by Zopa are performing very badly indeed at the moment. Thanks again... Thanks paule , ... For a one view look at our 4 accounts in Invest(2) and ISA(2), grouped together then but it may be interesting to consider the following stats .. Alltime (4 accounts) Total Core Loans = 8155 since start of 2017Core Loans in 2017 = 3554 have 50 Defaults = 1.41% of Core loans originating in 2017 Core Loans in 2018 = 4601 have 5 Defaults = 0.11% of Core loans originating in 2018 Alltime (4 accounts) Total Plus Loans = 2552 since start of 2016
Plus Loans in 2016 = 288 have 20 Defaults = 6.94% of Plus loans originating in 2016 Plus Loans in 2017 = 630 have 18 Defaults = 2.86% of Plus loans originating in 2017 Plus Loans in 2018 = 1634 have 5 Defaults = 0.31% of Plus loans originating in 2018 (Note Zopa IFISA did not exist in 2016 so its just 2 Invest accounts active that year) Zopa did have some issues with D/E loans in 2017 so hopefully the 2018 loans may have improved as the mix ratios were reduced from 30% to 15%(I think!). ... Not sure that makes things much clearer but its a view we can see from Aju Towers... This is my view from Aju Towers: Core (All time): 8155 loans, 55 defaults, default rate is 0.67% Plus (All time) : 2552 loans, 43 defaults, default rate is 1.68% It seems to me the Aju Towers plus are enjoying much lower default rate than Zopa's expectation 5%+. Mine Zopa plus alone has 32 defaults from 1100+ loans in just 8 months.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 5, 2018 19:13:14 GMT
Thanks paule , ... <Snipped ...> ... Not sure that makes things much clearer but its a view we can see from Aju Towers... This is my view from Aju Towers: Core (All time): 8155 loans, 55 defaults, default rate is 0.67% Plus (All time) : 2552 loans, 43 defaults, default rate is 1.68% It seems to me the Aju Towers plus are enjoying much lower default rate than Zopa's expectation 5%+. Mine Zopa plus alone has 32 defaults from 1100+ loans in just 8 months. Where is that Zopa figure of 5% plus, I can see some 2017 and 2016 not 2018 " Expected versus actual defaults" info but nothing at 5% or above unless you are extrapolating. Thing is those figures will have changed as they were taken last year and defaults will have occurred and finished since then, No?. (I don't understand why Zopa can't have these figures update daily IMHO, I can reproduce ours quite quickly just using the loanbook file). My use of the term alltime means the alltime csv which includes all loans not just the active ones. Perhaps I should be using the active loans (Current tables). That might bring the figures up a bit for someone using current figures (active loans). I'm happy to check that one out, that said most of my figures are actually taking loans lent during a given period regardless of their current status apart from the obvious one for the defaulted ones. I was never sure where Zopa got their figures and since it had a public file then I assume they take it as alltime loans rather than Active/Current/open loans. One also needs to bear in mind that those figures were based on 4 different accounts of varying time lengths and lending levels. That said it should not really matter as long as all the data has come from the same source. What I will say though is that there are very different separate figures so they are effectively averages of the 4. The other thing to bear in mind is that this is our experience, well Mrs Aju's as well but she started a lot later than me. I use Mrs Aju's name in a somewhat loose way here as to be honest she's not always sure what's happening and I do have jump in and tell her to press this and that button etc - you get the picture - she'd rather be doing her Ancestry than farting around with investments. She just likes to spend the spoils. One final thing is I feel that Zopa is similar to the recent New State pension, stock market etc. There will be people who are above the averages and some who are below. I'm not sure any of the risk figures are mean figures so to put it another if I am up then someone will invariably be down I guess. Mrs Aju has taken much more of default hit these last few months than I have but I can't for the life of me explain other then winner and losers. She's not lost any month on month profit but shes definitely down on the previous 6 months.
|
|