benaj
Member of DD Central
N/A
Posts: 5,597
Likes: 1,737
|
Post by benaj on Nov 5, 2018 23:42:52 GMT
Thanks paule , ... ... Alltime (4 accounts) Total Plus Loans = 2552 since start of 2016
Plus Loans in 2016 = 288 have 20 Defaults = 6.94% of Plus loans originating in 2016 Plus Loans in 2017 = 630 have 18 Defaults = 2.86% of Plus loans originating in 2017 ... Not sure that makes things much clearer but its a view we can see from Aju Towers... This is my view from Aju Towers: Core (All time): 8155 loans, 55 defaults, default rate is 0.67% Plus (All time) : 2552 loans, 43 defaults, default rate is 1.68% It seems to me the Aju Towers plus are enjoying much lower default rate than Zopa's expectation 5%+. Mine Zopa plus alone has 32 defaults from 1100+ loans in just 8 months. aju , Unfortunately, the risk data was updated in Jan 2018 for all (A-E) loans up to 2017. Zopa never publishes statistics for plus. If anyone one has time to examine the Zopa loan book, I think the data contains roughly 10% D-E loans. It is easy to misinterpret the 0.86% figure in the Zopa's risk data, because it takes up to 4 months before Zopa declared default and average age of the loan is about 6 months (loans from Jan till Dec). The 3.19% in 2016 shows a more accurate picture about the defaults for all loans in 2016, but for the plus, it is likely to be double as plus contains 30% of D/E loans at that time. However, it is easy to guess the expected default rate when Zopa always told me my plus lending @ 11.5% and my expected return was 5.5%, hence I expected the life time default rate for the plus is 5%+. Your defaults in the plus from 2016 6.94% certainly fits the 5%+ default model.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 6, 2018 0:34:57 GMT
benaj, Very interesting I see where you are coming from now. I must go and see what my projected rates were as I have tracked those in another spreadsheet since june 2017. I tend to pay more heed to those as an expectation then anything above that is a bonus in my eyes. They did add D&E into 2016/17 rates but as you say they do not specifically break out Plus and Core separately. I just did it that way as I had the data.
|
|
|
Post by erniec on Nov 6, 2018 11:27:23 GMT
Both Mrs C and I have taken big defaults on Investing Plus and lesser on ISA Plus yesterday. Haven’t had time to investigate yet but this may cause me to change away from Zopa, given I don’t believe we are achieving what Zopa are suggesting. I was able to easily achieve 5.4% on the RateSetter one year product yesterday, which itself is greater than what Zopa are promising.
|
|
|
Post by fishyhooky on Nov 10, 2018 12:09:30 GMT
3 days into November and I already have more in defaults than income in my Investing account
Interest £15.76
Defaults -£21.18
My ISA though is in positive territory 10 days gone in November and I'm still in negative territory
Interest £38.14
Defaults £46.25
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 10, 2018 17:30:52 GMT
3 days into November and I already have more in defaults than income in my Investing account
Interest £15.76
Defaults -£21.18
My ISA though is in positive territory 10 days gone in November and I'm still in negative territory
Interest £38.14
Defaults £46.25
It is creeping closer to a positive win though it does look like an uphill struggle. Mrs Aju started the first few days month very negative but has now crept back into the black and defaults in ISA are now 50% of Interest so far. That said I've noticed that each month never seems over "until the fat lady sings" to coin a well used phrase. .... I'm always positive - I think!
|
|
trium
Member of DD Central
Posts: 384
Likes: 304
|
Post by trium on Nov 11, 2018 16:10:45 GMT
For me it just gets worse and worse - I dread logging on. I,ve been running down Standard for a few months - think I'll start running down ISA as well, though it means bringing it out of the wrapper (unless I sell and transfer, or accumulate worthwhile amounts to transfer).
Actually my Standard defaults seem to be slowing. It's the ISA that's taking a hammering now. Others report their ISA's are currently OK - I guess it's a timing issue. When you bought loans will affect the default rate, not where you hold them. For me I was ramping up Standard (all Plus) from Feb to Jun 2017, then ISA until Apr 2018. Defaults began to get serious in Standard in Sep 2017 but ISA not until around April this year then worsening ever since (November is already my second worst ever month for new ISA bad debt)
|
|
|
Post by nutfield on Nov 12, 2018 10:21:33 GMT
Now where should I invest my loot? Lending Works at 6.5% and a provision fund? Ratesetter at 6% plus, and a provision fund? No, I know, I will invest with Zopa where the money shrinks most months!!!
|
|
paule
Posts: 44
Likes: 10
|
Post by paule on Nov 12, 2018 11:14:12 GMT
Well thanks to this board I have dipped my toe into ratesetter now, i like the provision fund and the 4% over one year was acceptable while I played with the site (far more confusing than Zopa but I will get there in the end)
now in total across my zopa investments isa and non isa - mostly plus; I'm showing net income just under £2K, bad loans £5.5K, that's in a 2 year period I'm expecting it to get worse as the Isa is now getting into the zone where the bad debts will peak if previous experiences are anything to go by.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 12, 2018 11:46:21 GMT
Well thanks to this board I have dipped my toe into ratesetter now, i like the provision fund and the 4% over one year was acceptable while I played with the site (far more confusing than Zopa but I will get there in the end) now in total across my zopa investments isa and non isa - mostly plus; I'm showing net income just under £2K, bad loans £5.5K, that's in a 2 year period I'm expecting it to get worse as the Isa is now getting into the zone where the bad debts will peak if previous experiences are anything to go by. So i understand that then (I'm not an accountant, yet!) does net income factor in the bad loans ie income of 2k after the 5.5k have been removed so total interest of say 7.5k or does that mean 3.5k ( 2k- 5.5k) overall loss so far. I'm sure it's obvious to most but am hoping its not an overall loss rather a 2k profit so far - ignoring the percentages both expected and real. If it is the former then it means the defaults are 78% relative to the interest received. Mrs Aju has had some bad months recently but I think nothing as bad as this, if I remember correctly her worst month was 60% but she like me only has 20% max in Plus. Also except in Classics we are mostly in £10 loans as I have said elsewhere this is unproven as a strategy but its been working for us for quite a while.
|
|
paule
Posts: 44
Likes: 10
|
Post by paule on Nov 12, 2018 12:39:35 GMT
net income does indeed factor in the bad debt.
my income would have been 7.5K but for all those who decided for one reason or another that they didn't want to pay back their loan.
this is on a very approximate, average £45K over 24 months or so (again very ballpark)
for me it makes no difference (in my head) if I have 100 loans of £100 or 1000 of £10 the maths says it should even out...
|
|
|
Post by newlender on Nov 12, 2018 12:55:37 GMT
Ratesetter is fine if you don't mind the early repayment syndrome, which has a far bigger effect then in Zopa. I got fed up of waiting for a good rate (mostly in the 1 year market) only to see it paid back after a few months. If a lender repays in Zopa it probably only affects £10 or £20. And to the poster who thinks that default rates are about timing more than the product chosen - have another look at the FAQs. Zopa Plus is still a very different offering to Core and comes (imho) with a massive health warning. My 20/80 split Z+/C has never given me a negative month's return and I recommend it to those who are risk-averse.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 12, 2018 14:33:11 GMT
net income does indeed factor in the bad debt. my income would have been 7.5K but for all those who decided for one reason or another that they didn't want to pay back their loan. this is on a very approximate, average £45K over 24 months or so (again very ballpark) for me it makes no difference (in my head) if I have 100 loans of £100 or 1000 of £10 the maths says it should even out... Ok I wondered if I was erring on the right side, perhaps I will make an accountant after all, Not!. So I agree with your premise on the numbers and the maths but for me the diversification of 1% is just too low in the overall picture. As I have said many times though I'm just experimenting with many loans rather than less loans of higher value. The other thing is I am still struggling with is to decide whether 20% is still too much in Plus, the reason for my struggle is that whilst Plus should be a more volatile proposition, based on Zopas own lending principles and estimates - they did get the D/E levels wrong last year by their own admission, but having a Diversification of 0.3% does still result in large numbers of defaults by loan but lower by value from my experience. All that said I am waiting for our accounts to settle more into monthly relend process unsullied by any additional lending on ISA's of late that seems to skew the figures quite a bit. Our XIRR's look ok but Excel is known to have some bugs that throw ZIRR things off sometimes. That said we have never before had our current amount lent out in Zopa before so the level of defaults may just be a smoke screen. Above I gave our default rates up to last month and they looked good loan by loan and to be fair the rate by value did not look too bad either - well below rates that I know others have stated they would be happier with. We are in Zopa for the long haul, when we have to start using the returns on a monthly basis I'm more of the opinion that this may have a more detrimental effect. Having the 1st 4-6 months on a loan before the defaults even start to emerge is not a small thing especially when the number of loans is quite high. (Over the passage of time and with next 6-12 months turmoil to get over I may have a different view but for anything above inflation is fine with me and groupling the investment as a whole we are fairing relatively well - my early adopter bonus also adds to that as well. As they say at Tesco "Every little helps")
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on Nov 12, 2018 14:46:19 GMT
Ratesetter is fine if you don't mind the early repayment syndrome, which has a far bigger effect then in Zopa. I got fed up of waiting for a good rate (mostly in the 1 year market) only to see it paid back after a few months. If a lender repays in Zopa it probably only affects £10 or £20. And to the poster who thinks that default rates are about timing more than the product chosen - have another look at the FAQs. Zopa Plus is still a very different offering to Core and comes (imho) with a massive health warning. My 20/80 split Z+/C has never given me a negative month's return and I recommend it to those who are risk-averse. Early Repayment Syndrome (ERS) has quite an effect in Zopa, but that maybe because I see many more loans using £10 loans on quite a well sized portfolio. The thing is though if Relend is on then early repayment can actually work in your favour as long as the rates are not in a downward spiral of course. ( Many people used to game RS and others by selling loans earlier when the most interest had been received from any given loan - I think they may have stopped that now though or made it much harder - its not that easy in Zopa with the engine making the adjustments for us and RR selling loans automatically by value) Mind you a few months ago it seemed that SG was seeing quite a few loans being SGed in error and early - that was down to an error on Zopa's part though. (I wonder how many people were compensated for that one especially as they screwed up the fix twice on the trot as well.) Of late it also seems that the rate of SG closure does seem higher but I am on top of my closures to make sure they are validly closed. It's no mean feat though to be able to quickly see the payments of a given loan but being able to does give you some quite useful tools. (Bring back the old Zopa online loanbook tools that did this for us as my Excel sheets are becoming huge with all the statements entries for the last 10 years )
|
|
ashtondav
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 1,092
|
Post by ashtondav on Nov 12, 2018 23:17:29 GMT
Been with Zopa from the start but now it’s just not competitive. RS and L W deliver 6%+ with provision funds. Zopa struggles to deliver anything like their projected returns. I’ve been withdrawing repayments for two years now, but the problem is that I am now left with all the bad loans and inevitably returns will get lower and lower.
|
|
trium
Member of DD Central
Posts: 384
Likes: 304
|
Post by trium on Nov 13, 2018 2:58:48 GMT
And to the poster who thinks that default rates are about timing more than the product chosen Did you mean me? I was saying that it doesn't matter whether you hold loans in an ISA or a Standard account. Several posters here report different experiences on each. I was saying that whether or not the loans are held in an ISA is irrelevant. If your ISA performs better than your standard that is either because your ISA loans are younger (so not into rampant default territory - yet!) or because your standard account had a higher exposure to the poorer quality loans originated around Spring/Summer 2007. To that extent timing is more likely to account for different performance than is the choice between ISA/Standard. Sorry if I wasn't clear
|
|