baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 548
Likes: 406
|
Post by baldpate on Jul 30, 2014 16:26:10 GMT
I've just received an email, purporting to be from ratesetter, offering the chance to win an iPad for participating in a survey - screenshot of first part of email below (sorry about quality). I'm treating it as spam, as all the links are to a domain name "click.ratesetter-info.com", not to "www.ratesetter.com". Anybody else had one of these?
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Jul 30, 2014 16:30:55 GMT
Yes, I had one. I didn't think it was spam as we're constantly being asked for our views legitimately, but I binned it anyway because I don't see the point.
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Jul 30, 2014 17:01:02 GMT
Appears to be a real email.
|
|
|
Post by davee39 on Jul 30, 2014 17:02:31 GMT
I would rather like an I-pad.
Looks genuine enough, some sensible questions and an invitation for a 30 min chat with a researcher. No request for personal info (apart from age and income range).
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Jul 30, 2014 17:28:33 GMT
I relented and fished it out of the bin . I already have an iPad and it drives me insane, but then again it was second hand and is now a few years old, so maybe a standby wouldn't be a bad idea. And somebody probably really will win one. The fact you said it didn't request lots of info and wasn't actually long swung it for me. Normally these things have me quite annoyed by a very early stage, but this one was fine.
|
|
|
Post by westonkevRS on Jul 30, 2014 18:31:45 GMT
This thread made me chuckle for all the wrong reasons, perfect fodder to laugh with (at?) Our Marketing gurus.
But I can confirm, it is genuine. Good luck with the iPad.....
|
|
|
Post by batchoy on Jul 30, 2014 19:29:27 GMT
I'm treating it as spam, as all the links are to a domain name "click.ratesetter-info.com", not to "www.ratesetter.com". baldpate you might want to check the domain name on Ratesetter's monthly statement emails.
|
|
baldpate
Member of DD Central
Posts: 548
Likes: 406
|
Post by baldpate on Jul 30, 2014 19:35:52 GMT
But I can confirm, it is genuine. Thanks for the confirm - I was quite happy to take the survey, & have now done so : best remind your Marketing department, though, not to expect people in this day & age to to take sweets from email strangers.
|
|
agent69
Member of DD Central
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 4,189
|
Post by agent69 on Jul 30, 2014 19:53:48 GMT
When I checked my e-mails this evening I had similar offers from both AC and TC (both apparently working in association with Nesta / Cambridge uni).
With a bit of luck I might win 2 ipads (whatever they are)
|
|
|
Post by bracknellboy on Jul 30, 2014 20:19:48 GMT
I feel decidely miff'ed. I had one from TC last night, but found that the Nesta survey took me in never ending circles (get to the end.....took me back to the beginning...3 times). But not had one from FC or AC...OK, I guess I'd better check whether they hvae been filtered in some way.
|
|
|
Post by geoffrey on Jul 31, 2014 5:15:09 GMT
I binned my email. I'm not going to waste my time in exchange for (the vague possibility of) some rent-seeking Fisher-price i-toy junk, thank you. The world's landfills are already overstuffed with yesterday's models.
|
|
|
Post by goldservice on Jul 31, 2014 10:18:58 GMT
I bin all online survey invitations. The RS survey might be excellent but most online surveys are rubbish and have discredited the technique. If companies really want to find out about their users and their experience of using their services, then they should simply talk to their customers.
Instead, companies are too often gulled by sellers of survey software. They fall for the line that the software will effortlessly compile large volumes of valuable data and then analyse it beautifully so that the company doesn’t have to do any work. The only beneficiaries are the survey software sellers.
The result is that the users are faced only with multiple choice questions and have no opportunity to write text; there may be no opportunity raise your own gripes; no one at the company will have to read and respond to a user’s views expressed in prose; the staff running the survey may not themselves be familiar with the company’s services.
It is worse than a missed opportunity because it actually distracts a company from getting useful feedback and allows the company to feel (and boast) that it is listening to its customers when it is not.
The best way for a company get feedback is to select users and then phone them. It’s called listening. This can be done unobtrusively by allowing customers to opt in to such calls.
All this is not aimed at RS as I haven’t read their survey; it’s just a reaction to too many mindless surveys that don’t give you a chance to say what you really want to say, or take longer than promised to complete etc. My background includes producing online survey software many years ago. End of rant.
|
|
|
Post by bengilbert on Jul 31, 2014 10:29:48 GMT
I know one of the people who are going to be analysing the data and producing the report on it - he's doing his PhD at Cambridge on crowdfunding. It's all completely genuine and they're taking it seriously. It isn't just a marketing exercise for the sites, though I'm sure it will be used to raise the general profile of the sector. I think having this sort of data will help organisations like the p2pfa when they lobby the government for support, which will be good for them if they make progress but probably good for us too.
I genuinely found the survey quick, easy and quite interesting to fill out. But feel free to discount that as biased.
|
|
c88dnf
Member of DD Central
Posts: 364
Likes: 266
|
Post by c88dnf on Jul 31, 2014 11:57:16 GMT
I think nobody should fill this survey in. That way, I win the iPad by default and become a Hero Dad by giving it to my daughter. Doesn't that seem entirely reasonable?
Joking apart, it's no real effort to complete and far less intrusive in its questions than those produced by the BBC, my personal bete noire persistent survey junkie organisation.
|
|
ramblin rose
Member of DD Central
“Some people grumble that roses have thorns; I am grateful that thorns have roses.” — Alphonse Karr
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 857
|
Post by ramblin rose on Jul 31, 2014 17:03:57 GMT
I bin all online survey invitations. The RS survey might be excellent but most online surveys are rubbish and have discredited the technique. If companies really want to find out about their users and their experience of using their services, then they should simply talk to their customers. Instead, companies are too often gulled by sellers of survey software. They fall for the line that the software will effortlessly compile large volumes of valuable data and then analyse it beautifully so that the company doesn’t have to do any work. The only beneficiaries are the survey software sellers. The result is that the users are faced only with multiple choice questions and have no opportunity to write text; there may be no opportunity raise your own gripes; no one at the company will have to read and respond to a user’s views expressed in prose; the staff running the survey may not themselves be familiar with the company’s services. It is worse than a missed opportunity because it actually distracts a company from getting useful feedback and allows the company to feel (and boast) that it is listening to its customers when it is not. The best way for a company get feedback is to select users and then phone them. It’s called listening. This can be done unobtrusively by allowing customers to opt in to such calls. All this is not aimed at RS as I haven’t read their survey; it’s just a reaction to too many mindless surveys that don’t give you a chance to say what you really want to say, or take longer than promised to complete etc. My background includes producing online survey software many years ago. End of rant. And all of that is why I initially binned this one. Totally agree. As it happens, this one was different though . (And I'll continue to bin all future ones, along with you, unless I know it's going to be OK).
|
|