|
Post by bikeman on Feb 12, 2018 20:01:03 GMT
No email , no payments - I am invested in the four suspended I** turbine loans via the GEA.
So let me get this right. The PF is designed to cover capital loss yet it is now paying some late interest payments, how does that work?
Meanwhile my capital wasn't diversified as promised and has been tied up in suspended loans for 9 months and the PF isn't paying me my capital let alone any interest due (despite the borrower initially keeping up with payments and AC pocketing it). The loans are not in recovery so I should be getting interest from the PF?
If the PF is supposed to protect my capital why isn't it 'buying' my suspended loans so I can get my capital back?
AC is making a cheap gesture to get some of it's lenders off it's back. For investors in the GEA stuck with suspended loans this is not good enough.
|
|
|
Post by df on Feb 12, 2018 20:19:48 GMT
I think this is a positive step by AC in starting to resolve some long standing issues so thank you stuartassetzcapital . I have held off posting about this in the past to give AC time to make a payment and communicate to lenders. I don't know what AC have communicated to lenders today as I haven't received the email yet so lenders may already have some or all of this information. Perhaps someone could be kind enough to post the email on this forum.
It has been just over three years since we introduced our first provision fund protected accounts back in late 2014, the Green Energy Investment Account (GEA) and the Great British Business Account (GBBA). We look constantly for ways to improve our offering, our service and the information that we provide to our lenders. We receive a steady flow of questions and comments regarding our provision funds so we have this week updated our provision fund web page to improve both clarity and detail in terms of how the funds work and what lenders should expect from them. We hope that you find this helpful. Separately, but on a related note, we have now identified and corrected a software problem which was preventing the payment of late/missed interest from the provision funds of the GBBA, GBBA2, GEA and the PSA accounts (but not the other accounts with provision fund protection, which were unaffected by this issue). We have now coded and deployed a fix which eliminates the problem going forwards and allows the relevant provision fund to cover late/missed interest payments in future. A sweep is also under way to identify instances where a late/interest payment has not been covered as a result of this problem so that a correction can be applied. This process has begun already and is automatic – lenders need take no action as we are already dealing with this on your behalf. Lenders affected by this issue will see a corrective payment shortly which should remedy the position for them. Please note that not all lenders will be affected, only those in the GBBA or GEA and only those with holdings in specific loans where there were late/missed interest payments. We would like to take this opportunity to thank the lenders who made us aware of the problem and apologise to those who were affected by it. The software update is a permanent fix and the problem should not reoccur. Encountering a technical issue like this is not something that we are happy with as a business and we are making a payment of £1000 to Young Money ( link), part of the Young Enterprise charity, in recognition that we could have done better. This is a fantastic charity and we would certainly encourage you to take a look at it as it focuses on bringing financial education into the classroom to help create a far more financially literate next-generation, something that we feel very strongly about as a company. We would like to thank you for your support and look forward to continuing to provide you with a healthy return on your money. Kind regards
|
|
jonah
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 1,113
|
Post by jonah on Feb 12, 2018 20:43:47 GMT
Late interest whilst loan isn’t in default... makes sense, minimal cost to the PF (ie only one or two payments per loan as it will either catch up payments or default) and makes the out for lenders more predictable. So far so good. Capital after a loan defaults and other options are exhausted. Again makes sense, as capital loss is probably the key reason for a PF. The only concern I have hear is timing, ie how lng the can kicking can continue, but based on comments above, hopefully that will become clearer soon. Not covering default interest. This makes sense... GBBA or GEA loans are interest capped so not point in paying an extra 3% or whatever. 2.5 out of 3 so far. However, the gap I can see is normal interest whilst in default. If loan X defaults and takes a year to either recover capital or have the PF close the gap with capital, then whilst the capital has been made whole, I’m missing 7% of X (if GEA). Do I read the FAQ correctly stuartassetzcapital and think that this “normal interest whilst in default” is not covered by the PF and won’t ever be paid out, unless the asset recovery is sufficient to cover it?
|
|
|
Post by df on Feb 12, 2018 20:45:31 GMT
No email , no payments - I am invested in the four suspended I** turbine loans via the GEA. So let me get this right. The PF is designed to cover capital loss yet it is now paying some late interest payments, how does that work? Meanwhile my capital wasn't diversified as promised and has been tied up in suspended loans for 9 months and the PF isn't paying me my capital let alone any interest due (despite the borrower initially keeping up with payments and AC pocketing it). The loans are not in recovery so I should be getting interest from the PF? If the PF is supposed to protect my capital why isn't it 'buying' my suspended loans so I can get my capital back? AC is making a cheap gesture to get some of it's lenders off it's back. For investors in the GEA stuck with suspended loans this is not good enough. PF will cover capital losses if the security, when sold and when other available realisation avenues have been exhausted, does not cover the loan balance remaining. It doesn't cover the capital whilst the loan is suspended. It also covers payment delays/shortfalls of interest from a borrower where that sum arrives later than expected. Updated version on website explains PF function quite clearly www.assetzcapital.co.uk/invest/faqs?utm_source=Assetz+Capital+Members&utm_campaign=423f929475-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_02_21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f8d8dd0f0d-423f929475-116755177#help-document-84I'm stuck with the same four I** and few others in GEA and GBBA. However, I don't think AC is making "a cheap gesture" or "pocketing" our returns or anything of the kind. E-mail sent today explains the situation and addresses lenders concerns about PF and late interest payments.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Feb 12, 2018 22:22:49 GMT
PF will cover capital losses if the security, when sold and when other available realisation avenues have been exhausted, does not cover the loan balance remaining. It doesn't cover the capital whilst the loan is suspended. It also covers payment delays/shortfalls of interest from a borrower where that sum arrives later than expected. <snip> Whilst any payment from the PF is to be welcomed, the additional problem is when will a default actually be declared. I'm under the impression - hopefully incorrectly - that AC are professional can kickers when it comes to formally defaulting a loan. Does anyone genuinely believe there will be further recovery from loans 132 and 146 - just a couple of examples. AC IMO should formally default so we can all move on. In the unlikely event of there being further pennies recovered then these can be distributed as straightforward income and declared as such. Somewhere down the line some reality does need to be applied.
|
|
teddy
Posts: 214
Likes: 90
|
Post by teddy on Feb 12, 2018 22:47:10 GMT
Whilst any payment from the PF is to be welcomed, the additional problem is when will a default actually be declared. I'm under the impression - hopefully incorrectly - that AC are professional can kickers when it comes to formally defaulting a loan. Does anyone genuinely believe there will be further recovery from loans 132 and 146 - just a couple of examples. AC IMO should formally default so we can all move on. In the unlikely event of there being further pennies recovered then these can be distributed as straightforward income and declared as such. Somewhere down the line some reality does need to be applied. No one knows how much money there is in the AC PF because AC won't tell us. I suspect it's probably not as much as we would like. The majority of lenders in the GBBA and GEIA who are sitting on defaulted/suspended (hair splitting in most cases) loans are now likely to want quick recompense from the PF of the principal amount lent, whether this recompense comes combined with interest repayments, or as a lump sum at the end of the term. This recompense will have to come from either the PF or from the sale of the held security. It's in AC's best interest to pay the invested capital on defaults back to lenders via the PF as soon as possible in order to maintain goodwill. This will act to focus the minds of AC on immediately declaring defaults and selling the security in order to replenish the PF. AC will no longer be able to keep kicking the can. Now, the only reasons for not introducing immediate repayments of capital from the PF will be either regulatory, or because the PF doesn't have enough moolah in it to cover AC's increasingly nasty amounts of bad debt.
|
|
angrysaveruk
Member of DD Central
Say No To T.D.S
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 788
Member is Online
|
Post by angrysaveruk on Feb 13, 2018 0:00:11 GMT
Good to see AC are paying out to the people who have been hit hard on the GEA. My interest from the start of the Calendar Year on my diversified manual investment portfolio has almost paid for my losses on the turbine loans now* (assuming a total write off), however I will be interested to see how AC deal with the recovery of the loans themselves and how upfront they are with investors. So far I like the way AC have dealt with the situation * I doubled my investment in AC so the loss is paid off quicker.
|
|
IFISAcava
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 3,018
|
Post by IFISAcava on Feb 13, 2018 1:32:49 GMT
Whilst any payment from the PF is to be welcomed, the additional problem is when will a default actually be declared. I'm under the impression - hopefully incorrectly - that AC are professional can kickers when it comes to formally defaulting a loan. Does anyone genuinely believe there will be further recovery from loans 132 and 146 - just a couple of examples. AC IMO should formally default so we can all move on. In the unlikely event of there being further pennies recovered then these can be distributed as straightforward income and declared as such. Somewhere down the line some reality does need to be applied. No one knows how much money there is in the AC PF because AC won't tell us. I suspect it's probably not as much as we would like. The majority of lenders in the GBBA and GEIA who are sitting on defaulted/suspended (hair splitting in most cases) loans are now likely to want quick recompense from the PF of the principal amount lent, whether this recompense comes combined with interest repayments, or as a lump sum at the end of the term. This recompense will have to come from either the PF or from the sale of the held security. It's in AC's best interest to pay the invested capital on defaults back to lenders via the PF as soon as possible in order to maintain goodwill. This will act to focus the minds of AC on immediately declaring defaults and selling the security in order to replenish the PF. AC will no longer be able to keep kicking the can. Now, the only reasons for not introducing immediate repayments of capital from the PF will be either regulatory, or because the PF doesn't have enough moolah in it to cover AC's increasingly nasty amounts of bad debt.But the problem is, until you sell the security, you don't know how much bad debt you have. As I understand it, the PF has three times the expected rate of bad debt. I'm stuck with an annoyingly large four figures in the GEIA, which i mainly had for warm fuzzy feeling purposes, but I know I will get it (capital) back eventually. I'm glad interest payments are now being honoured prior to any formal default (at which point I would expect repossession/capital recovery efforts). And it has taught me not to use these accounts and to stick with a much better diversified MLIA where i am my own discretionary provision fund.
|
|
|
Post by stuartassetzcapital on Feb 13, 2018 9:45:14 GMT
Hi
The directors of Assetz Provision Funding Limited review regularly those loans which are in recovery and close to realisation of the assets pledged in support of the loan. When realisation is complete (or when the prospect of further realisation becomes extremely unlikely) the directors can exercise their discretion to trigger the provision fund, provided sufficient funds are available.
We have cases which are approaching this threshold and expect shortly to make payments in accordance with the provision fund terms.
I can also confirm that the email update has gone to a wide base and everyone ever invested in GEA, GBBA1, GBBA2, PSA and the Access Accounts will have received this email.
|
|
markdirac
Member of DD Central
Posts: 128
Likes: 51
|
Post by markdirac on Feb 13, 2018 11:07:37 GMT
Well I am now even more baffled. I have spent hours discussing and complaining with AC that my return is nowhere near 7% - not slightly below 7%, but massively below 7%. Ben insisted twice that much of the shortfall below 7% was simply because of late payments.
I have 5 figures invested in GBBA and GEA. I received the payments yesterday from the provision fund. £4.13 and £3.26 !! That represents about 0.01% of my holding! The PF payments yesterday come absolutely nowhere near making up the shortfall about which I have been complaining for some months.
What on earth's going on here?
|
|
ding
Member of DD Central
Posts: 238
Likes: 132
|
Post by ding on Feb 13, 2018 11:24:16 GMT
#437 I** loan which I'm in is not paying out from the PF. As it's not in default. Last interest payment received 20/09/17
|
|
applets
Member of DD Central
Posts: 125
Likes: 227
|
Post by applets on Feb 13, 2018 11:37:02 GMT
Well I am now even more baffled. I have spent hours discussing and complaining with AC that my return is nowhere near 7% - not slightly below 7%, but massively below 7%. Ben insisted twice that much of the shortfall below 7% was simply because of late payments. I have 5 figures invested in GBBA and GEA. I received the payments yesterday from the provision fund. £4.13 and £3.26 !! That represents about 0.01% of my holding! The PF payments yesterday come absolutely nowhere near making up the shortfall about which I have been complaining for some months. What on earth's going on here? I am not sure anyone on the forum will be able to answer your question. Perhaps an email or telephone call to AC might provide you with an answer?
|
|
snowmobile
Member of DD Central
Posts: 230
Likes: 448
|
Post by snowmobile on Feb 13, 2018 11:54:52 GMT
#437 I** loan which I'm in is not paying out from the PF. As it's not in default. Last interest payment received 20/09/17 I'm confused My GEIA is 100% invested in loan 437. In summary 20% was quickly invested in this loan when I first allocated funds to the GEIA. Then nothing else at all. After a few weeks I got fed up of waiting and withdrew the other 80% of non invested cash. However loan 437 had already been suspended and could not be withdrawn. Thus I have received no interest at all on my GEIA for the past 5 months and was expecting the missing interest to be paid from the provision fund. I logged in after receiving that email yesterday and nothing has been paid, not even nanopence My understanding is this loan is suspended but not formally defaulted. The FAQ state that the provision fund does not cover default interest. So if this loan is not in default why isn't it covered?
|
|
markdirac
Member of DD Central
Posts: 128
Likes: 51
|
Post by markdirac on Feb 13, 2018 12:01:06 GMT
Well I am now even more baffled. I have spent hours discussing and complaining with AC that my return is nowhere near 7% - not slightly below 7%, but massively below 7%. Ben insisted twice that much of the shortfall below 7% was simply because of late payments. I have 5 figures invested in GBBA and GEA. I received the payments yesterday from the provision fund. £4.13 and £3.26 !! That represents about 0.01% of my holding! The PF payments yesterday come absolutely nowhere near making up the shortfall about which I have been complaining for some months. What on earth's going on here? I am not sure anyone on the forum will be able to answer your question. Perhaps an email or telephone call to AC might provide you with an answer? Thanks applets, but I've spent hours preparing for, calculating for, double-checking for, waiting for, then taking part in conversations and IMes with AC. But they just don't seem to get it. I was repeatedly told that some of my shortfall is because of "suspended" loans (not "defaulted" loans, or "bad debts", but "suspended"), and much was simply because of late payments. So I was expecting this PF payout / bug fixing to at least compensate for the latter. But no.
|
|
applets
Member of DD Central
Posts: 125
Likes: 227
|
Post by applets on Feb 13, 2018 12:07:17 GMT
Whilst any payment from the PF is to be welcomed, the additional problem is when will a default actually be declared. I'm under the impression - hopefully incorrectly - that AC are professional can kickers when it comes to formally defaulting a loan. Does anyone genuinely believe there will be further recovery from loans 132 and 146 - just a couple of examples. AC IMO should formally default so we can all move on. In the unlikely event of there being further pennies recovered then these can be distributed as straightforward income and declared as such. Somewhere down the line some reality does need to be applied. No one knows how much money there is in the AC PF because AC won't tell us. I suspect it's probably not as much as we would like. The majority of lenders in the GBBA and GEIA who are sitting on defaulted/suspended (hair splitting in most cases) loans are now likely to want quick recompense from the PF of the principal amount lent, whether this recompense comes combined with interest repayments, or as a lump sum at the end of the term. This recompense will have to come from either the PF or from the sale of the held security. It's in AC's best interest to pay the invested capital on defaults back to lenders via the PF as soon as possible in order to maintain goodwill. This will act to focus the minds of AC on immediately declaring defaults and selling the security in order to replenish the PF. AC will no longer be able to keep kicking the can. Now, the only reasons for not introducing immediate repayments of capital from the PF will be either regulatory, or because the PF doesn't have enough moolah in it to cover AC's increasingly nasty amounts of bad debt.
You may or may not be right about the size of the PF being large enough to fund all defaults, but I don't think it is reasonable to expect the fund to pay out on suspended loans as soon as they are suspended (a suggestion I think that was made when the wind turbines were suspended to permit further investigation) or when the end of term is reached and a borrower fails to repay their loan. I agree that there should be a reasonable timescale for defaulting loans and period for recovery, but this will inevitably vary depending on the circumstances for each loan. It would be good for AC (and other platforms) to be clearer on the timescales for each loan once these become known.
It does strike me that for the PF to repay capital and now late interest does seem a great step forward in reducing (but not eliminating) the risk. However, as lenders we have to acknowledge and accept that we may not get our money back on time, if at all. That is the price of p2p lending.
I appreciate many lenders are unhappy with the continuing lack of diversification in AC accounts, but this has been well documented on this forum for a long while. It is also easily enough to check where your money is lent after it is deposited and, as others have said, there is an opportunity to withdraw reasonably swiftly if you don't like what you see (and in most cases before defaults arise).
The rules of engagement now seem reasonably well documented by AC and on this forum. It may be time for those who prefer the guaranteed interest/ instant availability of capital offered by most banks and building societies to look at withdrawing their remaining funds from AC.
|
|