Jeepers
Member of DD Central
Posts: 818
Likes: 721
|
Post by Jeepers on Mar 18, 2018 22:26:47 GMT
What returns can be expected on a well diversified Lendy portfolio ?
I would say 20% of loans will default resulting in an average 30% loss.
So I'd expect the advertised 12% to be more like 5-6% after bad debts (assuming the original term is 12 months) so still a decent return.
Thinking about it, if those figures are correct it wouldn' be worth it after tax.
|
|
hazellend
Member of DD Central
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 2,180
|
Post by hazellend on Mar 18, 2018 22:30:32 GMT
If you factor in tax that would not be worth the risk
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Mar 18, 2018 22:40:07 GMT
What returns can be expected on a well diversified portfolio ? I would say 20% of loans will default resulting in an average 30% loss. So I'd expect the advertised 12% to be more like 5-6% after bad debts (assuming the original term is 12 months) so still a decent return. If it is 5-6% pre-tax and I frankly have no idea I would have to ask is it worth it especially considering any time spent on DD.
PS - I assume that as this is on the LY board then you are referring to them.
|
|
|
Post by dualinvestor on Mar 18, 2018 22:43:56 GMT
What returns can be expected on a well diversified portfolio ? I would say 20% of loans will default resulting in an average 30% loss. So I'd expect the advertised 12% to be more like 5-6% after bad debts (assuming the original term is 12 months) so still a decent return. Without getting into an argument over valuations etc, with the Lendy model of retaining interest, you have a c.30% loss on day one so when you consider forced sale values, cash drag on collections costs, the fact that a lot of loans are not 12%, your figures with that type of default rate are optimistic, without considering the current number of defaults that, I am informed by posts on this forum, are nearly a third.
|
|
adrianc
Member of DD Central
Posts: 10,019
Likes: 5,147
|
Post by adrianc on Mar 19, 2018 9:43:10 GMT
It all comes down to recoveries. Two and a half years after my first deposit, I'm currently sitting around 11.5% XIRR - but if every single one of my current defaulted and suspended loans is suddenly taken as £0 value, then I'm at 0.75% XIRR. Still +ve, sure, but...
So where do we think the recoveries will go? I'm optimistic. I've not seen anything yet that's led me otherwise. I've got a chunk in two that've had the security sold - Shr*pshi*e and the Ca*tl* - and are slowly threatening to gnaw at the guarantors. Then there's a few that'll probably go down the same route - the M*r*l*b*n* and H*rl*w pair, in particular, and the interminable L**th*rh**d. So I'm not expecting 100% of them, but I'd be disappointed at less than 75%, especially given some of the other red stripes in my spreadsheet are looking very positive. That's going to leave me around 8% or so XIRR, and I'm reasonably happy that there's not another similar string of reds ahead - I think L have learnt their lesson.
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Mar 19, 2018 11:18:41 GMT
After a little over 3 years with Saving Stream / Lendy, my XIRR estimate ranges from 12.2% (valuing all parts at par, but ignoring all accrued & bonus interest) down to around 9.6% (if I ascribe zero value to defaulted and suspended parts). My best guess estimate is something around 11%, which is way higher than I ever assumed (my assumption was perhaps 8% net). This figure reflects the facts that: a) I benefited from the "sunshine years", when most traffic on this forum was about getting bigger allocations and FFF strategies for bagging anything that appeared on the SM (very little about DD!!) b) I've always been rather cautious about which loans to lean into and which to avoid, meaning I've dodged many of the bullets and have only small stakes in 3 or 4 "problem loans" (for which I blame myself entirely; I knew they were higher risk but continued to keep a toe in as I was too greedy to sell) c) my total Lendy holding is down to about 70% of what it once was, good new loans having lagged behind repayments of older ones. That said, it's up 10-15% again in the last few months.
It's understandable that lenders who took the "Earn 12%, asset-secured with a provision fund" message at face value, and assumed there'd always be SM buyers for any loan part, are frustrated and venting at Lendy on here. Lendy don't do themselves any favours by continuing to imply that all in the garden is rosy. However, IMHO, the strongly negative bias to current forum traffic is as overdone as the strongly positive bias through most of 2014/15/16. The reality is that high-risk P2P lending eventually ALWAYS incurs losses, which individually can be ugly.
Pretty much all P2P platforms have gone through a honeymoon period where lender demand runs ahead of loan supply, where the loan book is too young to have yet incurred losses, and where platforms' overriding focus is on accelerating loan origination (both number and size). Almost always, this results in a rash of ill-advised loans that platforms (and their lenders) end up regretting ever taking on. It happened to AC, it happened to TC, it happened to FC and it's happened more recently to FS, Lendy, and MT (COL never even made it that far!).
Inevitably there's then a painful period whilst lenders learn the P2P "facts of life" and platforms learn the art of recovering defaults (and both come to realise that this process takes a VERY long time). Some platforms manage this better than others; AC's reputation has generally risen through proving their skills at long-term recovery. FC threw in the towel quickly and pulled the plug on asset-secured lending. For FS, Lendy, MT, etc. the jury is very much still out.
For what it's worth, I'm encouraged by Lendy's approach to recoveries to date. Whilst they put a superficial gloss on communications (and hide the smellier details), their strategic hires look sensible and their actions vis-a-vis recalcitrant borrowers appear robust and tenacious. They're going to have to dial in their ambitions for a while in terms of filling big new loans, and be creative in filling remaining tranches of existing ones, but their business model is pretty sound and I suspect they'll ride out the storm OK provided they carry on learning.
|
|
bugs4me
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 1,478
|
Post by bugs4me on Mar 19, 2018 11:50:07 GMT
My XIRR since first £100 toe dip in 2014 is currently 12.98% incl CB's plus bonus's. My last deposit was back in Feb 2017 - a platform confidence thing on my part but the XIRR looks healthy.
Taking a simple 50% write-off of my current loans - active and defaulted would result in an XIRR of 7.92% which would be acceptable. In the (highly) unlikely event of a total wipe out of current loans then the XIRR plummets to 1.80% - so marginally ahead of 'the game'.
So overall a satisfactory result. I expect losses in the P2P marketplace but as SteveT correctly pointed out '....Lendy don't do themselves any favours by continuing to imply that all in the garden is rosy....' - so why oh why continue to try and lead investors into believing they live in La La Land when everything points in a different direction - to reality.
|
|
Steerpike
Member of DD Central
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 1,687
|
Post by Steerpike on Mar 19, 2018 12:05:45 GMT
Similar figures for 3.5 years investment.
100% recovery of default loan capital = XIRR 12.29% 0% recovery of default loan capital = XIRR 10.83%
However, what may be spooking many people is the £36m on the default list and the potential for platform failure.
Platform failure leading to say 70% capital only recovery leaves me with XIRR 0.55%, so still not a total calamity.
However, I suspect that these calculations look a lot worse for those that started investing more recently.
|
|
lobster
Member of DD Central
Posts: 636
Likes: 467
|
Post by lobster on Mar 19, 2018 12:11:32 GMT
I've been lucky with Lendy, having invested quite heavily using the "Georget" technique of basically loan flipping. I'm totally out now with no losses. However it should be stressed that this has been far more due to luck than judgement, with plenty of others, particularly on this forum, knowing far more than I do about almost every aspect of P2P. Another reason for not getting too smug concerns the other platforms. MT has been fine , and I should also have a 100% record with FS as long as a couple of low LTV loans pay out. However , very different story with AC where my luck very much reversed. Strange because personally I reckon AC is a much more stable platform. Anyway, in order to try and diversify out of property I put a bundle into some turbine loans, with by far the largest chunk going into #437 which was suddenly suspended about 6 months ago before I had any chance to try and bale out. This is only one loan but it was by far my biggest, so the likely losses there will be substantial with the wretched turbine currently lying in a shed in some Scottish wasteland . Guess it's the old rookie error of putting too much into a single loan, but in fairness to yours truly, it was in an effort to diversify out of property.
|
|
Jeepers
Member of DD Central
Posts: 818
Likes: 721
|
Post by Jeepers on Mar 19, 2018 12:23:45 GMT
Those who have been in Lendy for years (like me) have HAD very good returns.
I'm weighing up the future and ignoring the past and wondering if Lendy is attractive to continue investing in.
I would estimate future returns to be more like 5% and whilst it's decent, it's not worth the effort. Any thoughts ?
|
|
|
Post by mrclondon on Mar 19, 2018 12:23:53 GMT
What returns can be expected on a well diversified Lendy portfolio ? I would say 20% of loans will default resulting in an average 30% loss. So I'd expect the advertised 12% to be more like 5-6% after bad debts (assuming the original term is 12 months) Agreed, a 5% to 7% return is the best that should be expected from a well diversified portfolio on ABL / AC / COL / FS / L / MT / TC / BLEND / all similiar platforms. (Some of those platforms are too young for the real default rate / loss on default to have become apparent) And stating the obvious, it could be a lot less then 5% and could indeed be negative. Moving money from Lendy to another similiar platform isn't reducing the risk its simply moving it.
|
|
ganymede
Member of DD Central
Posts: 304
Likes: 211
|
Post by ganymede on Mar 19, 2018 12:30:45 GMT
I'm all out of Lendy with no losses have been since July/August 2017. Mostly had 12% loans. Tried to limit any cash drag. If I did looks at returns the number would expect close to 12%.
I wouldn't expect those returns now.
|
|
hector
Member of DD Central
Posts: 122
Likes: 162
|
Post by hector on Mar 19, 2018 13:21:24 GMT
What returns can be expected on a well diversified Lendy portfolio ? I would say 20% of loans will default resulting in an average 30% loss. So I'd expect the advertised 12% to be more like 5-6% after bad debts (assuming the original term is 12 months) so still a decent return. Thinking about it, if those figures are correct it wouldn' be worth it after tax. You might like to see my posts under .....'Whats on the SM'.... dated March 1st & 18th 2018
|
|
seb8072
Member of DD Central
Posts: 177
Likes: 99
|
Post by seb8072 on Mar 19, 2018 16:04:21 GMT
Also see: p2pindependentforum.com/thread/11540
|
|
p2p2p
Member of DD Central
Posts: 123
Likes: 114
|
Post by p2p2p on Mar 20, 2018 8:10:54 GMT
As to the question as to what level of return is worth it, a lot depends how much time it takes up. Do I do all the due diligence, and worry about my mistakes, invent a diversification algorithm, or just autobid. If the difference in results for each strategy is 8,7,6 % (and I've no accurate answer, as debt recovery takes so long), I'd need to be investing an awful lot to make the extra work worth while, which is in itself is a big risk. What started as a loan picking game has become work now.
I've been moving money into FC, just because its so much easier. And even if their promised 7.5% doesn't happen, could I have done much better
LL's autobid is of course useless because the tranches are considered separate. If they had an autobid with 1 rule - no more than x% per borrower, I'd be much happier.
|
|