aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on May 6, 2018 23:37:10 GMT
Okay so I do a lot of work with statements and loanbooks and as I was doing my consolidations for April I usually test a couple of Borrowers to make sure I am getting the correct data etc.
So I tested a couple of new started on the 18/01, they are classic transfers in this case, I have found a loan disbursal of identical values where there are 2 of everything in both statements data and also the Current and the All_time so they are not corruptions I have created in error.
So all the data is identical across all fields. The statements "loan disbursal record have identical disbursal amounts.
It ok of course but I was just taken aback, I haven't as yet queried this with Zopa and I'm guessing that this was a larger sized loan say £20 and its been split for whatever reasons perhaps. I'm off to check the borrower in my Invest side as it was a safeguarded transfer to ISA block. The loans were created 10-12 secs apart.
Edit: Well it appears I have many of them and not just duplicates some are in fact triplicates although many of those has slightly different amounts in the decimal part of the numbers.
I tried to find some of them in the old side but I gave up after 5 of them were not in there. I'm guessing the RR and disbursal matching engines split them but not too sure why.
|
|
Greenwood2
Member of DD Central
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 2,782
|
Post by Greenwood2 on May 7, 2018 5:16:31 GMT
If it was transferred from safeguard it should still be safeguarded shouldn't it? So doesn't affect potential losses.
I hope they haven't done that with the isa pre-funding, that would increase exposure to individual loans. I'll have to have a look.
|
|
aju
Member of DD Central
Posts: 3,500
Likes: 924
|
Post by aju on May 7, 2018 8:26:52 GMT
If it was transferred from safeguard it should still be safeguarded shouldn't it? So doesn't affect potential losses. I hope they haven't done that with the isa pre-funding, that would increase exposure to individual loans. I'll have to have a look. Yes it is safe in that respect but initially I was more concerned that there might have been a corruption of some kind in either my data or worse my processing of it. It plays havoc with my statement viewing tool in that I assumed that indexing on the borrower_id would be enough and in a sense it is but its a bit odd lining up the relevant payments to the relevant loan in fact its not possible from statements alone and even then joins between statements and loanbook are unable to tell which payments go with which part of the loan. Its an issue I had when a borrower has more than one loan too - usually at different times so its not hard to isolate the payments to each loan. It does affect the ability to check the returns on a loan a little but at a given payment date - (the time stamp allows an isolation to a degree) it is still possible to check each monthly return rate. The extrapolation on these do play a little havoc with the average rates though. I may have more work to isolate those and probably won't bother as I just use the statement tool to get a feel for winners and losers rate wise. Getting a bit too detailed now though. Its highly likely pre-funding uses a similar process why would you create a new one. They copy the SG flag across accordingly. Thing is though there is a chance that where you have SG flag set on the Invest side the criteria should be that the SG follows across. It could be though that they have some of the same effects so it will definitely be worth checking those Non SG loans for duplicates and then making a complaint that wasn't the desired effect. In my SG transfer case I had loans of £10-£50 as it was not a problem for diversification at that time. It may be that zopa just split the larger loans in an odd way.
|
|