iainf
Posts: 16
Likes: 10
|
Post by iainf on Aug 6, 2018 8:58:55 GMT
Don't want to bang on about but I'm still tracking my loans in the sale queue. Have attached my excel spreadsheet of the tracking. It's got gaps but shows the different speeds and changes: LY_sale_queue_bis.xlsx (12.31 KB) The three loans are not moving up the queue at the same speed. In other words, the queue is not a first-come-first-served thing, or in other words, it's not a queue at all in the sense we understand the word. In fact, it is more like a temporary holding pattern or buffer, no doubt designed to allow Lendy to manage the marketplace by avoiding floods of certain assets, runs on the bank etc.. I don't think whoever designed the system ever anticipated assets being in there long enough for it to become an issue. But it is now, as many of us have considerable sums stuck in this queue. FCA promotes duty of care, and part of that is when funds are held by a financial services institution, there is a certain degree of transparency and accountability. In the case of the Lendy sale queue this is total black magic and secrecy. We have absolutely no idea what is going on in there and absolutely no recourse. I'm not sure what can be done, but this feels very wrong and disappointing to see the FCA not really do their job:-(
|
|
withnell
Member of DD Central
Posts: 550
Likes: 491
|
Post by withnell on Aug 6, 2018 9:18:56 GMT
Why would you expect three separate loans to move at the same speed?
Apart from a small blip on PBL178 (31-4th), all your loans are moving towards the front of the queue each time you take a snapshot - what do you feel is untoward here?
|
|
iainf
Posts: 16
Likes: 10
|
Post by iainf on Aug 6, 2018 9:30:52 GMT
Hey you looked at my file:-) Didn't think anyone was interested in this sale queue thing... Thanks for the challenge, and I'd love to be wrong so I could be a little less cross which is bad for my blood pressure... In my opinion, what is untoward is: - Calling it a "queue" when it does not behave as one (not first-come-first-served like cuddly toys on a conveyor belt)
- Lack of transparency about how it works (what forces are acting on these loans? Why do some go faster than others?)
- No recognition from Lendy that this a failure of duty of care. If they said something like "we run a thing to feed the secondary market and we use it to keep things as fluid as possible but in slow times this can result in some assets getting stuck while others whizz through" and explained they had to do that as part of their effort to keep the platform afloat, I could accept that. But they don't. If they re-named it to "Lendy-managed holding pattern" I could live with that. But they haven't
Of course I don't want Lendy to fail as I hope to eventually get some of my money back, but other FS companies have to follow some rule, why not Lendy?
|
|
SteveT
Member of DD Central
Posts: 6,875
Likes: 7,924
|
Post by SteveT on Aug 6, 2018 9:35:55 GMT
Each individual loan has its own separate sales queue. The queues move as fast as people choose to buy into each loan. Which bit of that don’t you understand?
|
|
iainf
Posts: 16
Likes: 10
|
Post by iainf on Aug 6, 2018 9:48:58 GMT
Well, that bit for starters, I was guessing that there was one "sale queue" for all assets being listed for sale.
Also, why have a queue at all? Why not just list assets for sale on the secondary market?
Also, why should performance on the marketplace have any bearing on being listed on the marketplace? Would you not prefer to simply let your assets be listed for sale and then let the supply/demand forces of the market decide if and when your asset is bought?
|
|
empirica
Member of DD Central
Posts: 326
Likes: 235
|
Post by empirica on Aug 6, 2018 9:58:44 GMT
What I don't understand is why you might think there was only one queue when you have been tracking three values over time, but regardless... One loan sold out and two getting there, one very slowly.
|
|
iainf
Posts: 16
Likes: 10
|
Post by iainf on Aug 6, 2018 10:38:32 GMT
Nice chart. Technically one has not "sold out". Once it made it to the front of the queue and onto the secondary marketplace it sold fairly quickly but it is currently stuck (been there for a week now) at 86.4% sold. Keeping fingers and toes very crossed:-)
Your question assumes that everyone knows what a queue is (why you might think there was only one queue...)
The "sale queue" is an entirely arbitrary concept that never needed explaining until a lot of assets got stuck in it.
What is it?
The chart you created could just as easily show the three loans on the secondary marketplace, selling bit by bit until they were completely sold.
What value or use or function does the sale queue provide?
I've sold stuff at car boots, on ebay, door-to-door, on Zopa and even on the stock market. You put your stuff for sale, then wait until somebody buys it. THAT I understand.
The sale queue is like the overflow car-par across the street in front of the car boot sale. You can't open your trunk and get started selling until you're inside the approved area... I can see why you might need an overflow car park in real life, but what possible purpose could it add to a digital marketplace?
It feels like everyone else is going "hey, what's the problem" and I'm just being very dense so maybe I should leave it there...
|
|
Balder
Member of DD Central
Posts: 646
Likes: 622
|
Post by Balder on Aug 6, 2018 10:45:52 GMT
Good idea
|
|
|
Post by sayyestocress on Aug 6, 2018 12:04:04 GMT
There is a sell queue because there are more people looking to sell than buying. And as you can only sell loan parts at par the only thing to fairly distinguish between sellers is whoever listed their loan parts first gets to sell first when a buyer shows up,especially as lendy don't pay interest on loan parts in the sell queue. How would you propose to do things differently and fairly? The only alternative is allowing sales at premiums and discounts but there are cons to this method, too.
|
|
|
Post by portlandbill on Aug 6, 2018 12:28:58 GMT
not forgetting that Lendy will dump their excess holdings (usually unsold tranches) at the front of the queue so even when you get to the front, you might not stay there for long.
|
|
empirica
Member of DD Central
Posts: 326
Likes: 235
|
Post by empirica on Aug 6, 2018 13:00:28 GMT
not forgetting that Lendy will dump their excess holdings (usually unsold tranches) at the front of the queue so even when you get to the front, you might not stay there for long. Is that still the case? I'm pretty sure that another poster who tracks these things had suggested evidence that the 'dumping' had stopped. The chart of the DFL019 _ which has oodles of new tranches on a regular basis _ suggests that observation is accurate.
|
|
|
Post by brightspark on Aug 6, 2018 13:54:08 GMT
There is a sell queue because there are more people looking to sell than buying. And as you can only sell loan parts at par the only thing to fairly distinguish between sellers is whoever listed their loan parts first gets to sell first when a buyer shows up,especially as lendy don't pay interest on loan parts in the sell queue. How would you propose to do things differently and fairly? The only alternative is allowing sales at premiums and discounts but there are cons to this method, too. Because Lendy takes the interest of loans on the secondary market it has an incentive to promulgate policies that keep the secondary market long. A system which did not penalise lenders would be for lenders to receive interest to the point of sale. The current behaviour of Lendy re interest is one more reason why I have not invested via their platform for around a year. In my view their behaviours put Lendy first, borrowers second and lenders a distant third (short-termism) whereas Lendy should be showing equal consideration to the needs of each party if the goal is a long-term viable business.
|
|