loadsahope
Member of DD Central
Posts: 84
Likes: 44
|
Post by loadsahope on Jun 28, 2024 16:40:32 GMT
Do AE still cap the capital gains? ISTR there was some sort of 3% limit, though I'm wondering if this was my fevered imagination a while back Yes, 3% per annum, though I understand this is a restriction imposed by regulation (can't remember where I read this). IIRC excess profits above this, should they arise, are supposed to go into a provision fund which is not property specific.
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,315
Likes: 11,523
|
Post by ilmoro on Jun 28, 2024 18:35:00 GMT
Do AE still cap the capital gains? ISTR there was some sort of 3% limit, though I'm wondering if this was my fevered imagination a while back Yes, 3% per annum, though I understand this is a restriction imposed by regulation (can't remember where I read this). IIRC excess profits above this, should they arise, are supposed to go into a provision fund which is not property specific. Yes, FCA restriction on capital gains for it to still be P2P
|
|
eeyore
Member of DD Central
Posts: 796
Likes: 804
|
Post by eeyore on Jul 5, 2024 16:18:06 GMT
I see that the AE management are canvassing for lenders' views on a name change.
|
|
qwakuk
Member of DD Central
Posts: 259
Likes: 96
|
Post by qwakuk on Jul 5, 2024 18:39:40 GMT
I see that the AE management are canvassing for lenders' views on a name change. Made my own suggestion of a name
|
|
|
Post by overthehill on Jul 5, 2024 21:27:28 GMT
I see that the AE management are canvassing for lenders' views on a name change. Made my own suggestion of a name Lender formerly known as AssetzCapital
|
|
dave4
Member of DD Central
Cynical is a hobby not a lifestyle
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 616
|
Post by dave4 on Sept 26, 2024 16:38:14 GMT
E mail copy and paist.
We are very pleased to announce that the share transaction outlined in our May newsletter has now concluded. Stuart Law is no longer a shareholder in the company and has no other involvement or influence. There are no remaining ties to any of Stuart’s other companies including Assetz Capital.
In the coming weeks we will be changing our name and undergoing a full rebrand but the underlying platform, investments and ethos will remain the same.
The new investors are well known to our management team and they are incredibly optimistic about the future of the company now this difficult period can be put behind us. They believe in what we are doing and the product we are offering, with the sole focus now being on supported living and not development projects.
We will be undertaking a fundraise later this year in order to bolster our balance sheet and to invest in initiatives to grow the company and the four investors alongside the remaining directors of the company will be the cornerstone of this raise.
As ever we are hugely appreciative to all our investors for the support and excellent feedback we are given. We want to improve our platform and product and are always open to discuss any feedback or new suggestions.
If anyone would like to discuss any of the above our Managing Director has made himself available for a one on one call with any investor. A time slot can be booked here:
|
|
|
Post by Badly Drawn Stickman on Sept 26, 2024 17:04:56 GMT
I joined at its original launch and seem to remember a large part of its sales pitch was the connection to a well established platform.
Not sure a name change (rose by any other name and all that) is necessary if they believe what they say about the separation. The original platform seems to be slowly withering on the vine and will in due course disappear. At which point it would surely confuse new investors doing any due diligence to discover the past link. Yet obviously is not overly concerning current investors.
|
|
|
Post by BenAssetzExchange on Sept 26, 2024 17:27:05 GMT
I joined at its original launch and seem to remember a large part of its sales pitch was the connection to a well established platform. Not sure a name change (rose by any other name and all that) is necessary if they believe what they say about the separation. The original platform seems to be slowly withering on the vine and will in due course disappear. At which point it would surely confuse new investors doing any due diligence to discover the past link. Yet obviously is not overly concerning current investors. Yes, it has to be said that having a connection to AC was a huge benefit when we first launched. We got a lot of our current investors that way, indeed it is how the four investors who have taken Stuart's shareholding were introduced to us (and how I myself as an investor on AC became involved in AE). From the outset though we were an independent company and Stuart has never been involved in the day to day running of the business. The name change is necessary for 3 reasons. 1) We have no connection to AC or any other company called Assetz and it is clear the association is now very bad, 2)We have never liked the name. Try telling someone in the pub about the platform (it's Assetz with a z!), the name does not spread well via word of mouth, lots of people misspell it as Assets (and an amusing corollary of that is that some people put in asset sexchange.co.uk when loking for us). We also think spelling words is very school dayz 1990s style, not really in fashion and 3) it is a condition of this transaction that we stop using the brand Assetz. Finally, you do not seem to believe what we say is true but you can check on Companies House that Stuart is no longer a director and in the coming days a confirmation statement will be uploaded which will confirm that Stuart is not a shareholder. The platform is not withering, we are working on increasing the pipeline and the last loan we brought (which has just gone into pre-bid stage for investors) was underwritten in less than 60 seconds. Most of our new investors come via word of mouth and we expect them to continue to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Badly Drawn Stickman on Sept 26, 2024 17:47:23 GMT
I joined at its original launch and seem to remember a large part of its sales pitch was the connection to a well established platform. Not sure a name change (rose by any other name and all that) is necessary if they believe what they say about the separation. The original platform seems to be slowly withering on the vine and will in due course disappear. At which point it would surely confuse new investors doing any due diligence to discover the past link. Yet obviously is not overly concerning current investors. Yes, it has to be said that having a connection to AC was a huge benefit when we first launched. We got a lot of our current investors that way, indeed it is how the four investors who have taken Stuart's shareholding were introduced to us (and how I myself as an investor on AC became involved in AE). From the outset though we were an independent company and Stuart has never been involved in the day to day running of the business. The name change is necessary for 3 reasons. 1) We have no connection to AC or any other company called Assetz and it is clear the association is now very bad, 2)We have never liked the name. Try telling someone in the pub about the platform (it's Assetz with a z!), the name does not spread well via word of mouth, lots of people misspell it as Assets (and an amusing corollary of that is that some people put in asset sexchange.co.uk when loking for us). We also think spelling words is very school dayz 1990s style, not really in fashion and 3) it is a condition of this transaction that we stop using the brand Assetz. Finally, you do not seem to believe what we say is true but you can check on Companies House that Stuart is no longer a director and in the coming days a confirmation statement will be uploaded which will confirm that Stuart is not a shareholder. The platform is not withering, we are working on increasing the pipeline and the last loan we brought (which has just gone into pre-bid stage for investors) was underwritten in less than 60 seconds. Most of our new investors come via word of mouth and we expect them to continue to do so. Not aware I have said I don't believe you any where. Just your assumption? The platform referred to in the last section is Assetz Capital not yourselves. Your Paranoia? Interesting response to a mainly observational post.
|
|
firedog
Member of DD Central
Posts: 367
Likes: 461
|
Post by firedog on Sept 26, 2024 17:50:20 GMT
I joined at its original launch and seem to remember a large part of its sales pitch was the connection to a well established platform. Not sure a name change (rose by any other name and all that) is necessary if they believe what they say about the separation. The original platform seems to be slowly withering on the vine and will in due course disappear. At which point it would surely confuse new investors doing any due diligence to discover the past link. Yet obviously is not overly concerning current investors. The platform is not withering, we are working on increasing the pipeline and the last loan we brought (which has just gone into pre-bid stage for investors) was underwritten in less than 60 seconds. Most of our new investors come via word of mouth and we expect them to continue to do so. I think the text in bold was a reference to AC rather than Assetz Exchange, although the use of the term 'original' perhaps proves the value of a name change: hopefully it will bring to an end the perception of a continuing connection between the two companies that some people seem to want to see.
|
|
firedog
Member of DD Central
Posts: 367
Likes: 461
|
Post by firedog on Sept 26, 2024 18:12:46 GMT
The platform is not withering, we are working on increasing the pipeline and the last loan we brought (which has just gone into pre-bid stage for investors) was underwritten in less than 60 seconds. Most of our new investors come via word of mouth and we expect them to continue to do so. The platform referred to in the last section is Assetz Capital not yourselves. Your Paranoia? To be fair, given you mentioned joining at the 'original' launch of (I presume) AE and a sentence or so later mentioned the 'original' company withering, it's pretty uncharitable to label any misunderstanding as 'paranoia'.
|
|
|
Post by easterbunni on Oct 26, 2024 8:23:20 GMT
Quick question if I may folks...
#126 Old Basford - "Tenant pays for all repairs and maintenance"
So how come damp and roof repairs are coming out of the contingency fund?
|
|
ilmoro
Member of DD Central
'Wondering which of the bu***rs to blame, and watching for pigs on the wing.' - Pink Floyd
Posts: 11,315
Likes: 11,523
|
Post by ilmoro on Oct 26, 2024 10:28:04 GMT
Quick question if I may folks...
#126 Old Basford - "Tenant pays for all repairs and maintenance"
So how come damp and roof repairs are coming out of the contingency fund?
That statement appears to be incorrect as the terms of the lease clearly have the Landlord ie the AE SPV, as responsible for the structural elements BenAssetzExchange
|
|
|
Post by BenAssetzExchange on Oct 26, 2024 14:15:20 GMT
Quick question if I may folks...
#126 Old Basford - "Tenant pays for all repairs and maintenance"
So how come damp and roof repairs are coming out of the contingency fund?
That statement appears to be incorrect as the terms of the lease clearly have the Landlord ie the AE SPV, as responsible for the structural elements BenAssetzExchange Hi, Tenant responsibilties on the page states 'Internal repairing' as this is an internal repairing lease. As stated structural repairs are indeed the responsibility of the landlord. I agree this sentence could be clearer and could be misconstrued. I will address this isse internally.
|
|